Madras High Court Monthly Digest - April 2023 [Citations 109 - 132]

Citations: 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 109 To 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 132 NOMINAL INDEX X v. State of Tamil Nadu and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 109 Priya Dharshini and another v. State of Tamil Nadu and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 110 K Marimuthu v. The Secretary to Government and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 111 Vishal Krishna Reddy v Lyca Productions, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 112 Neyatitus v. The Regional Passport Officer, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 113 Commissioner of Income Tax Versus Sri. R. Rajagopal Tondaiman, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 114 Sankar v The State, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 115 Sivaprakasam v. The District Collector and 5 othrs, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 116 V Senthil Balaji v. Nirmal Kumar and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 117 Kudankulam Nuclear Power Employees Union v. Government of India and ors, 2023 LiveLaw Mad 118 Arulmigu Kalasalingam College of Education v. The Appeal Committee and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 119 A Muthupandi v. State, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 120 Susamma Baby v. State and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 121 K Udhayakumar v. The District Collector and another, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 122 M Syed Ali Fathima v. State and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 123 R Radha and another v The State and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 124 Susila and others v. S Thirumalai and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 125 XYZ and others v. Kalakshetra Foundation and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 126 P. Cheran vs M/s Gemini Industries & Imaging Limited, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 127 Matrimony.Com Ltd v Alphabet Inc and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 128 Advantage Strategic Consulting Singapore Private Limited v. Dr. Subramanian Swamy and another, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 129 Ziyavudeen Baqavi v. The Union of India, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 130 Annadurai v Jaya, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 131 Vasuki v The Secretary to Government and Others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 132 REPORTS 'Violation Of Privacy, Loss Of Reputation': Madras High Court Asks State To Compensate Woman Falsely Implicated In Case Under Immoral Traffic Act Case Title: X v. State of Tamil Nadu and others Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 109 The Madras High Court has directed the State Government to pay a compensation of Rs 2 lakh to a woman who was falsely implicated in a case under the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act 1956. Justice R Vijayakumar of the Madurai bench noted that the State could not shirk its liability by claiming that the officers involved were not performing their official duty. Further, the court rejected the State's defence that the charge sheet was quashed on the basis of a detailed enquiry conducted by it and thus it was not liable to pay compensation. Celebrity Couples Sneak Through Surrogacy Laws While Those Eligible Denied Treatment By Authorities Unaware Of Statutory Procedures: Madras High Court Case Title: Priya Dharshini and another v. State of Tamil Nadu and others Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 110 The Madras High Court has directed the State of Tamil Nadu to form District Medical Boards in all districts under the provisions of the Surrogacy Act 2021. The court added that members of these Boards may not necessarily be from the medical colleges as the Act does not contain such stipulation. Justice GR Swaminathan of the Madurai bench also noted that the authorities should be well versed with the procedures under the Act so that the applications are disposed of expeditiously. Further, since the intending parties had to approach the Judicial Magistrate for matters concerning parentage and custody, it was necessary to sensitise the judicial officers also. Lawyers' Right To Be Considered For Empanelment In Nationalised Banks Is Fundamental Right, Time To Review Existing Procedures: Madras High Court Case Title: K Marimuthu v. The Secretary to Government and others Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 111 Observing that the right to be considered for "appointment/empanelment" in a bank is a fundamental right of citizens, the Madras High Court recently directed all the Nationalised and Public Sector Banks to review their existing procedures for empanelment of lawyers. Justice SM Subramaniam said that the existing procedures are not in consonance with the established procedure and are against the constitutional mandate. The court added that the prevailing procedures enable the banks to empanel lawyers as per their whims and fancies, thus depriving opportunity for rightful candidates. The court also added that absence of a definite procedure will lead to corruption, favouritism and nepotism. The court observed that while those lawyers, who had God Fathers could solicit the authorities and seek empanelment, the other lawyers, would lose out on opportunities thus affecting their fundamental rights. Madras High Court Restrains Actor Vishal From Releasing Any Movie Until He Deposits ₹15 Crore To Credit Of Suit Filed By Lyca Productions Case Title: Vishal ...

Madras High Court Monthly Digest - April 2023 [Citations 109 - 132]

Upasana Sajeev

Tags