Madras High Court Monthly Digest: July 2025

Citations: 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 223 To 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 262 NOMINAL INDEX ML Ravi v. Director General of Police and Others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 223 P Kishore v. The Secretary to Government and Others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 224 M/s. Adyar Gate Hotel Ltd. v. The Commissioner of Customs, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 225 M/s Media Monks Multimedia v. Pachala Murali Krishna, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 226 S. Sai Priya and Others v. Union of India and Others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 227 Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) v. The Commissioner of Police and Another, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 228 Abimani v. Government of India and Others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 229 The State of Tamil Nadu v. Tvl. Aro Granite Industries Ltd., 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 230 M/s.Axeon Marketing India v. The Assistant Commissioner of Customs (Group 2) and Others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 231 Krishna @ Krishnakumar v. The State, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 232 M/s.Madurai - Kanyakumari Tollway Private Limited and others v. Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 233 P Vikash Kumar v. A Mohandass, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 234 K.J. Vinod (Insolvency Professional) v. Registrar, National Company Law Tribunal, Chennai & Ors., 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 235 Kayar Nisha and Another v. State, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 236 J Eswaran v. The State of Tamil Nadu and Others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 237 ICICI Securities Limited versus Kariabettan Sugumar, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 238 Malar Selvi v. The Director DVAC, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 239 Dr.A.K.Boominathan v. The Director of Collegiate Education and Others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 240 Thirumalaisamy v. The State of Tamil Nadu and Another, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 241 Venkatesan v. The District Collector and Others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 242 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 243 Prakash Ramachandran v. The District Collector and Others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 244 R.K.M Powergen Private Limited v. The Assistant Director and others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 245 High Court of Madras v. Siva Das Meena IAS and Another, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 246 M/s. Eminent Textiles Mills Private Limited v. The State Tax Officer & Ors., 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 247 P. Sakkarai vs. The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests & Others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 248 R Ramkumar and Others v. The Union of India and Others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 249 Vanniyakulachathiriyar Nala Arakattalai v. The District Collector and Others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 250 P. Ganga Parameshwaran vs. The Government of Tamil Nadu & Others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 251 Palai Rafi @ Mohamed Rafi v. The State, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 252 T Prabhakar v. Mr. Dheeraj Kumar and Others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 253 Vanaraj and Others v. The State, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 254 Muniraj v The State and Others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 255 The Commissioner, GCC and Others v. S Jaya and Others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 256 CJ Christopher Signi v State of Tamil Nadu, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 257 A Shankar @ Savukku Shankar v. The Secretary to Government and Others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 258 S. H. Zarina Begum v. The State, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 259 M Pravin v. The Secretary, Ministry of Civil Aviation and Others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 260 Harinaa v. The Regional Passport Officer, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 261 C. Ve Shanmugam v The Chief Election Commissioner, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 262 REPORTS 'People Say A Lot Of Things On Mic': Madras HC Rejects Plea To Interrogate BJP Leader For Evidence In Anna University Sexual Assault Case Case Title: ML Ravi v. Director General of Police and Others Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 223 The Madras High Court on Tuesday (July 1) dismissed a plea seeking to interrogate BJP leader Annamalai in connection with the evidence allegedly in his possession with respect to the Anna University sexual assault case. In a recent interview, Annamalai had claimed that he had materials connecting higher officials with the Anna University Case. He said that he knew who the accused had referred to as “Sir” at the time of the offence. Dismissing the petition filed by Advocate ML Ravi, Justice P Velmurugan said that politicians would keep on making such comments on a mic and the Courts should not waste its time on such matters. An Individual's Phone Can't Be Tapped To Uncover Suspected Crime, Would Violate Right To Privacy: Madras High Court Case Title: P Kishore v. The Secretary to Government and Others Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 224 The Madras High Court has held that an individual's phone cannot be tapped in a secret operation to detect the commission of a crime, and the same would violate the individual's fundamental right to privacy. Justice Anand Venkatesh noted that phone tapping would be justified only on two conditions: the occurrence of a public emergency or in the interest of public safety. The court also highlighted that these situations/ contingencies should be apparent to a reasonable man. The court also added that ...

Madras High Court Monthly Digest: July 2025

Upasana Sajeev

Tags