Madras High Court Monthly Digest - March 2025 [Citations 81-122]

Citations: 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 81 To 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 122 NOMINAL INDEX Prof. Dr. R. Manonmani and Others v. The State of Tamil Nadu and Others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 81 Bhuvaneswari and others v. M/s. Bvm Storage Solutions Pvt Ltd and Another, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 82 Regina Begum v The State, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 83 L V Sarojini v The District Collector and Others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 84 C. Ganesan v The Commissioner, HR & CE Department, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 85 The State v MK Alagiri, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 86 B Manickam Tagore v. V Vijaya Prabakaran and Others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 87 Nupur J Sharma And Another v. The Inspector of Police and Another, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 88 News Tamil 24x7 v. Shruthi Thilak and Others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 89 Venkatesh Sowrirajan v. The Union Territory of Puducherry and Others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 90 Y Babu v. The Inspector of Police, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 91 ML Ravi v Election Commission of India and Others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 92 Ammavasithevar v. KR Chitran and others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 93 The State of Tamil Nadu and Others v. The Principal Secretary, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 94 Dr S John William v. Loyola College (Autonomous), 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 95 Kamalesh Chandrasekaran v. MA Noor Jehan Beevi and Others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 96 S Shankar v. The Deputy Director, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 97 United India Insurance v. State of Tamil Nadu and Others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 98 A Devika v. The Senior Branch Manager and Another, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 99 M. Gunasekaran v. The District Registrar and Others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 100 The District Collector and Others v. P Naveen Kumar and Others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 101 ABC v. XYZ, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 102 The Secretary and Others v. The State of Tamil Nadu, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 103 Arasu S v. The Tahsildar, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 104 MH Jawaharulla v. The Inspector of Police, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 105 Kajendran J v. The Superintendent of Police, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 106 V. Samburanam v. District Collector, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 107 Vijay Vaishnavi Sriram v. Union of India and Others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 108 S. Mayalagu v. The Director of Collegiate Education and Another, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 109 Seeman v. State of Tamil Nadu, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 110 Kavitha Anand v. The State of Tamil Nadu and Others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 111 Mohammed Ibrahim v. The Secretary, TNPSC and Another, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 112 Gillette Diversified Operations vs. Joint Commissioner of GST and Central Excise, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 113 S Mala v. District Arbitrator & District Collector, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 114 ABC v. XYZ, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 115 B Kavitha v. The Registrar General, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 116 Boopalan B v. Union of India and Others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 117 South Ganga Waters Technologies (P) Ltd., Rep. By its Authorized Signatory Mr.Vijay Ramesh, Chennai vs Vedanta Limited, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 118 State v. Govindaswamy and another, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 119 Marudhu Pandi v. The State, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 120 Mohammed Faruk v. Union of India, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 121 Prasanna Sankaranarayanan v The State, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 122 REPORTSAdministrative Delay, Acts of Court Shouldn't Come In Way: Madras HC Directs State To Promote Eligible Professors As Dean In Govt Medical CollegesCase Title: Prof. Dr. R. Manonmani and Others v. The State of Tamil Nadu and Others Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 81 The Madras High Court has directed the State government to appoint professors specialising in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, General Surgery and Orthopaedics, to the post of Dean in Government Medical Colleges, whose promotion was delayed due to an oral order of the court and imposition of Model Code of Conduct (MCC) in light of the 2019 general elections. Justice Anand Venkatesh in his order observed, “In the case in hand, there was an oral direction issued by the Madurai Bench of this Court not to issue the promotion and transfer order till a particular date and ultimately, those writ petitions were dismissed as withdrawn. This oral direction issued by the Madurai Bench of this Court should not act prejudicial to the rights of the petitioners, who would have otherwise got the promotion and transfer orders along with others on 28.2.2019 when the Medical Officers working in the other 22 specialities were issued with the promotion and transfer orders". The court noted that the Government delayed the promotion of the individuals due to an oral instruction by the court asking the state not to issue any promotion order until a challenge to the same was heard. The court noted that the petitioners, who were otherwise eligible to be appointed as Deans, should not be denied the opportunity when they were not at fault. The court added that no person should suffer due to the act of the court. Insurance Company Liable To Pay Compensation...

Madras High Court Monthly Digest - March 2025 [Citations 81-122]

Upasana Sajeev

Tags