P&H High Court Issues Notice On Contempt Plea Claiming IOA Prez PT Usha Failed To Send Player's Name For Asian Games Despite Assurance

Aiman J. Chishti

15 Sept 2026 3:10 PM IST

  • P&H High Court Issues Notice On Contempt Plea Claiming IOA Prez PT Usha Failed To Send Players Name For Asian Games Despite Assurance

    The Punjab and Haryana High Court has issued notice on a contempt petition filed by a Taekwondo player against P.T. Usha, President of the Indian Olympic Association (IOA), alleging that the Association failed to comply with an assurance recorded in an earlier court order regarding her participation in the Asian Games 2026. Justice Deepinder Singh Nalwa issued the notice after the...

    The Punjab and Haryana High Court has issued notice on a contempt petition filed by a Taekwondo player against P.T. Usha, President of the Indian Olympic Association (IOA), alleging that the Association failed to comply with an assurance recorded in an earlier court order regarding her participation in the Asian Games 2026.

    Justice Deepinder Singh Nalwa issued the notice after the petitioner alleged that, despite the IOA having informed the Court that her name had already been recommended and forwarded for participation in the Asian Games, the same was never actually forwarded to the concerned authorities.

    The petitioner had earlier approached the High Court seeking a direction to the IOA to send her to participate in the Asian Games 2026 in Taekwondo in the Over-67 kg category, representing India.

    While disposing of that writ petition on July 20, 2026, the Court had recorded a statement made on behalf of the IOA that the petitioner's name had already been recommended for participation in the Asian Games and forwarded to the Olympic Council of Asia as well as the concerned Ministry.

    The petitioner has now alleged that after the writ petition was disposed of on the basis of the said statement, she learnt and verified from material placed on record that the IOA had, in fact, not forwarded her name to the concerned authorities.

    She contends that the statement made before the Court was not an ordinary submission but a categorical statement concerning a specific action allegedly already taken by the IOA.

    According to the petitioner, having made such a representation before the Court, the IOA was required to act consistently with it, and its failure to forward her name defeated the basis on which the earlier proceedings were disposed of.

    The petitioner has accordingly alleged wilful non-compliance with the court order and sought action under the Contempt of Courts Act.

    When the matter was first taken up, counsel appearing for the respondent sought time to obtain instructions.

    Yesterday, the Court issued notice of motion and granted time to the respondent to file a written statement. The matter has been adjourned to September 29.

    Mr. Rupender Singh Ghangas, Advocate for the petitioner.

    Title: ETISHA DAS V/S P.T. USHA PRESIDENT INDIAN OLYMPIC ASSOCIATION

    Aiman J. Chishti

    Aiman J. Chishti

    Aiman J. Chishti is a Principal Correspondent with LiveLaw, covering Punjab And Haryana High Court

    Next Story