Rajasthan High Court Monthly Digest: April 2025

Citations: 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 125 To 2024 LiveLaw (Raj) 160NOMINAL INDEXM/s Fortune Infovision Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v Commissioner of Income Tax 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 125Rajesh Kumar v State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 126Management Committee, Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan Vidyashram & Anr.v Rameshwar Lal Meena & Anr., and other connected petitions 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 127Gas Authority of India Limited versus M/s Mahima Real Estate (P) Limited 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 128Mohammad Salim & Ors. v Abdul Kayyum & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 129Ganesh Narayan Nayak & Anr. v State of Rajasthan & Anr., and other connected petitions 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 130IN RE: “Beat the Heatwave and Climatic Change to Save the Life of Public at Large” v. Union of India 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 131Badri Narayan Sharma v State of Rajasthan & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 132Kiran Yadav v the State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 133Pritika Gahlot & Ors. v the State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 134Smt. Vidya Devi v State of Rajasthan & Ors., and other connected petitions 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 135Giriraj Pugalia v Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 136State of Rajasthan v Vikram Singh Indroi 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 137Bharat Kumar v Rajasthan Rajya Vidhyut Prasaran Nigam Ltd. & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 138Pooja Punaram & Ors. v Rajasthan University of Heath Sciences & Ors., and other connected petitions 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 139Sitaram v Executive Engineer, Irrigation Division, Jodhpur & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 140Dr. Shankar Lal Bamania v State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 141Dr. Renu Kala Mathur v State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 142Sadaram & Ors. v State of Rajasthan & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 143Managing Committee, D.A.V. Uchh Madhyamik Vidayalaya v Saurabh Upadhayaya, and other connected petitions 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 144Yashwant v State of Rajasthan & Ors, and other connected petitions 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 145LRs of Avtar Singh & Ors. v LRs of Gajanand & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 146Smt. Shakuntala & Anr. v Smt. Pallavi 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 147Kuldeep Parasar v State of Rajasthan 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 148Neeraj Kanwar v State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 149Suo Moto v the Chief Secretary, Government of Rajasthan & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 150Union of India & Ors. v No. 2648428 Ex-Hav and Hony Nb/sub Raghbir Singh 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 151J v State of Rajasthan & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 152Mamta Choudhary v State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 153Dr. Deva Ram v the State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2025 Live Law (Raj) 154Ajay Chaturvedi v State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 155Satyaveer Singh v the State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 156Indra Dudi v State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 157Naru Lal Meghwal v the State of Rajasthan & Anr., and other connected petitions 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 158Kapil Ram v State of Rajasthan 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 159Anil Paliwal v State of Rajasthan & Ors, and other connected petitions 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 160Kamal Singh v StateOrders/Judgments of the MonthRajasthan HC Quashes Prosecution Sanction Against E-Commerce Company For Delay In Depositing TDS Due To Late Submission Of Bills By Amazon, E-BayTitle: M/s Fortune Infovision Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v Commissioner of Income TaxCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 125Rajasthan High Court set aside prosecution under Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”), against the petitioner-company whose business activity related to e-commerce transactions, and owing to delay on part of the companies like Amazon, Naaptol, Ebay, etc. in submitting the bills, the petitioner got delayed by almost 10 months in submitting the deducted TDS.The division bench of Justice Maneesh Sharma and Justice Avneesh Jhingan held that since the TDS was deposited voluntarily by the petitioner, that too along with interest for delay, no case was made out against the petitioner-company.The Court opined that it was a settled proposition that penal proceedings could not be initiated merely because it was lawful to do so unless the conduct of the assessee was malicious.No Finding That Drop In Marks Was Due To Him: Rajasthan HC Quashes Censure Against Chemistry Teacher For School's Poor 12th Board ResultTitle: Rajesh Kumar v State of Rajasthan & Ors.Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 126The Rajasthan High Court set aside the penalty of censure imposed on a school teacher in relation to a charge that the12th Board Exam result in Chemistry of the concerned school remained below the standard fixed by the Department of Education.Justice Anoop Kumar Dhand observed that "there was no allegation that the result of the concerned school dropped due to commission or omission on part of the petitioner" in which case, he could not have been penalized under Rule 17 of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1958 (“the Rules”)."The result remained below the norms fixed by the Department of Education, may be for several reasons and without arriving at a finding...

Rajasthan High Court Monthly Digest: April 2025

Nupur Agrawal

Tags