Rajasthan High Court Monthly Digest: August 2025

Citations: 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 257 To 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 291NOMINAL INDEXOrders/Judgments of the MonthSohan Singh v Rajkidevi & Ors.; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 257Manni Devi v Rama Devi & Ors.; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 258Ram Kishan v Ram Dai & Ors.; 2025 Live Law (Raj) 259Raisuddin v State of Rajasthan, and other connected matters; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 260Chandra Kant Ramawat v State of Rajasthan & Anr; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 261Riteesh Kumar Jyotishi & Ors. v State of Rajasthan, and other connected matters; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 262Garvit Vyas v State of Rajasthan & Ors.; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 263Manish Saini v Central Board of Secondary Education & Ors.; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 264Smt. Mariya v State of Rajasthan; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 265Sarla Devi v State of Rajasthan & Anr.; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 266Seher Gogia v The Foreigners Regional Registration Officer & Anr.; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 267Victim v State of Rajasthan & Ors.; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 268Kanwar Singh & Ors. v State of Rajasthan & Ors.; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 269M/s Mdindia Health Insurance Pvt. Ltd. v State of Rajasthan & Ors.; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 270District Transport Officer, Haumangarh v Banwarilal & Anr.; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 271Ankita Singodia v Rajasthan University of Health Sciences & Ors.; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 272Arman v Central Board of Secondary Education & Ors.; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 273Continental Engineering Corporation Limited v Jaipur Metro Rail Corporation; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 274Nisha Meena v State of Rajasthan & Ors.; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 275Mrs. Nirmala Kabra v The Registrar of Trade Marks & Anr.; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 276Manav Seva Samiti v Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 277Aditya v State of Rajasthan & Anr.; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 278Gram Panchayat, Asota v State of Rajasthan & Ors.; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 279Shankar Lal Saini v Smt. Nagina Patoliya & Anr.; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 280Mahaveer Prasad v State of Rajasthan & Ors., and other connected petitions; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 281Naurang v Lrs of Late Sri Chunnilal & Ors.; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 282Harbajan Singh v Superintendent of Police; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 283Khuman Singh v State of Rajasthan & Ors., and other connected matters; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 284Dr. Rafique Khan v National Institute of Ayurveda; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 285The Rajasthan Public Service Commission v Lavanshu Shukla & Ors., and other connected petitions; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 286State of Rajasthan v Chimna Ram; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 287Pragya Singh v Union of India And Ors.; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 288Victim v State of Rajasthan & Ors.; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 289Mahesh Joshi v Enforcement Directorate, Jaipur; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 290Kailash Chand Sharma & Ors. v the State of Rajasthan & Ors.; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 291Other CasesSuo Motu vs. Ministry Of Road Transport And Highways, Government Of India & OthersAsharam Alias Ashumal v. State Of RajasthanPadam Kumar Jain v Bank of Maharashtra and Anr.Rajasthan University of Health and Sciences v The State of Rajasthan & Ors.Vijay Kumar Boyat S/o Shri Raju Boyat & Ors. v. Vaibhav Galriya, Principal Secretary & Ors.Suo Motu v Union of India & Ors., and other connected petitionsPublic Against Corruption v State of RajasthanAsharam Alias Ashumal v. State Of RajasthanAjay Shivpuri v State of RajasthanSadhana Shivhare v State of RajasthanREPORTSOnly Civil Courts Can Decide Disputes Regarding Cancellation Of Voidable Sale Deed Concerning Agricultural Land: Rajasthan High CourtTitle: Sohan Singh v Rajkidevi & Ors.Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 257The Rajasthan High Court has held that in case allegations in a plaint make out a case of the transfer of a property being voidable, only the civil courts shall have jurisdiction, and not the revenue courts, irrespective of the disputed property being an agricultural land and a bar on the same under Section 207 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 (“the Act”).Section 207 of the Act lays down that certain suits and applications relating to agricultural land must be heard and determined exclusively by a revenue court.The bench of Justice Chandra Shekhar Sharma was hearing a revision petition challenging order of the Trial Court that rejected petitioner's application under Order 7, Rule 11, CPC, seeking dismissal of the suit filed by respondent.S. 2(2) Hindu Succession Act Is 'Barrier' For Tribal Women To Lay Claim Over Father's Property: Rajasthan High Court Suggests AmendmentTitle: Manni Devi v Rama Devi & Ors.Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 258The Rajasthan High Court has opined that when daughters belonging to non-Scheduled Tribe (“ST”) communities were entitled to equal share in father's property, there was no reason to deny the same right to the daughters of the ST community.Section 2 of the Hindu Succession Act lays down the scope of application of the Act, and Section 2(2) gives states that nothing contained in the Act shall apply to the members of any Scheduled Tribe within the meaning of clause (25) of Article 366 of the Constitution unless the Central Government, by notification in the...

Rajasthan High Court Monthly Digest: August 2025

Nupur Agrawal

Tags