Rajasthan High Court Monthly Digest: February 2025

NOMINAL INDEX [Citations: 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 44 To 2024 LiveLaw (Raj) 80]Manju Sharma v State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 44X v State of Rajasthan 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 45Nathu Lal v State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 46Ram Chander v the State of Rajasthan 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 47Rakesh Sen v Smt. Ajab Bano 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 48Au Small Finance Bank Ltd v Atmaram Bishnoi and Others And Batch 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 49Jugal Kishore & Ors. v State of Rajasthan and other connected petition 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 50Mohammad Aslam v State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 51Hari Singh & Anr. v State of Rajasthan, and other connected petition 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 52Anita Devi v State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 53Rajesh Sharma v State of Rajasthan & Ors. and other connected petitions 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 54Sunil Samdaria v/s State Of Rajasthan and another 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 55Sushila Devi Jatav versus State of Rajasthan 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 56Sattar Khan v Zila Parishad & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 57Sardar Mal Yadav v State Elementary Education and Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 58Pukhraj Purohit & Ors. v State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 59LRs of Late Sanwarmal Sharma v Smt. Deeta Devi & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 60Anandi Lal & Anr. v Shri Dalip Prajapat & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 61Sunil Dattatrey v the State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 62Bharti Sharma v State of Rajasthan & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 63State of Rajasthan v X 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 64Girdhari Karmachandani v Punjab National Bank & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 65Suman Bishnoi v State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 66Suresh Kumar v Union of India & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 67Rakesh Mandola & Anr. v State of Rajasthan 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 68Champa Lal Ojha v State of Rajasthan & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 69Ram Niwas v State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 70Dheeraj Singh Parmar v State of Rajasthan 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 71Ramesh Bairwa v State of Rajasthan & Other connected application 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 72Abhishek Agrawal v Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 73Shakur Shah and another vs. Iliyas and others 2024 LiveLaw (Raj) 74Surendra Bisnoi v State of Rajasthan & Ors, and other connected petitions 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 75State of Rajasthan & Anr. v Sunita, and other connected appeals 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 76Warekar Dnyanraj Ganesh & Ors. v the Chairman NEET PG Admission/ Counselling Board 2024 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 77R. Magadaiah v I.G. CRPF & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 78Moola Ram v State of Rajasthan & Ors, and other connected petitions 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 79Private Physiotherapy, Nursing & Para Medical Institutions Society v Rajasthan University of Health Sciences 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 80 X v The State of Rajasthan & OrsKaushalya Devi v Central Administrative TribunalOrders/Judgments of the MonthState To Consider 'Exceptional Personal Hardships' Faced By Employees: Rajasthan HC Sets Aside Transfer Of Nurse Who Looks After Aged MotherTitle: Manju Sharma v State of Rajasthan & Ors.Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 44Rajasthan High Court set aside the transfer of a Nurse, 300 Kms away from her current posting, considering that she is the sole earner of her family comprising her mother who was a senior citizen widow, suffering from Alzheimer's and thus requiring medical treatment at current place.The bench of Justice Arun Monga held that the transfer would not only cause logistical difficulties to her but also adversely affect the timely care of her mother. The Court held that the peculiar situation of the petitioner of bearing the entire financial and caregiving responsibility of her dependent mother would add another layer of hardship in discharge of her duty if she was transferred.34 Yrs On, Rajasthan HC Sets Aside Rape Conviction Citing Failure To Conduct Test Identification Parade, Asks State To Properly Instruct IOsTitle: X v State of RajasthanCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 45The bench of Justice Anoop Kumar Dhand at the Rajasthan High Court directed Director General of Police, Jaipur and the Principal Secretary, Department of Home, for issuing instructions and guidelines to all the Police Investigating Officers of Rajasthan to conduct the Test identification Parade (“TIP”) of the accused with the victim in cases where the accused was not known to the victim.The Court highlighted that the names of the accused were given by the victim only based on the names that her relatives had told her after the commission of the offence. It was opined that in absence of a TIP, relying solely on the victim's testimony regarding accused's identification, when there was no other link to connect the accused with the incident, was wholly unsafe.The Court also pointed out the situation where to pacify and/ or avoid public revolt against the police for non-detection of such crimes, investigating agencies implicate a person who could not be connected with the crime by legally acceptable evidence. It was stated that in the present case...

Rajasthan High Court Monthly Digest: February 2025

Nupur Agrawal

Tags