Rajasthan High Court Monthly Digest: June 2025

Citations: 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 195 To 2024 194 LiveLaw (Raj) 221NOMINAL INDEXThe State of Rajasthan, through District Collector Pali. & Ors. vs. Sanwariya Infrastructure Private Limited 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 195Komal Kumawat & Ors. v Union of India & Ors., and other connected petitons 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 196Arpit Naraniwal v State and batch 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 197Mahipal Singh v Kundal Mal 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 198Anup Agrawal v State of Rajasthan & Anr, and other connected petitions 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 199Ajaypal Singh v State of Rajasthan, and other connected petitions 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 200Gyanchand Soni v State of Rajasthan & Ors., and other connected petitions 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 201Shrilal v Smt. Bhagwati Devi 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 202All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur & Anr. v Dr. Mahendra Kumar Garg, and other connected petitions 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 203Mohammad Anwar v the Chairman, Rajashtan NEET Ayush, and Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 204Shekharchand Sacheti & Anr. v S.M.F.G. India Home Finance Company Limited & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 205Hdfc Bank Limited v Nagar Parishad Jhunjhunu 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 206Mohammad Abid & Ors. v State of Rajasthan 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 207Ramswaroop v Moolchand & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 208Shankar Lal v Jugal Kishore & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 209State of Rajasthan v Sharafat & Anr, and other connected matter 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 210Bhawani Pratap Singh v State of Rajasthan 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 211Hari Ram & Ors. v State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 212Anindita Biswas v National Law University, Jodhpur & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 213X v Y 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 214Banarsi Das Mittal v the State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 215Ankit Bansal v Union of India 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 216Mushtaq Ali v State of Rajasthan 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 217Smt. Kailash Kanwar Rathore & Ors. v State of Rajasthan 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 218X v The State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 219Mahir Bishnoi v National Testing Agency & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 220Ashutosh Bajoria v Rajesh Kumar Sharma (S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 12/2023) 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 221Manisha Mina v State of Rajasthan & OthersUmakant Sharma v Om Prakash SharmaIn Re: Grievance of Girls staying at Balika Grah and Care Leavers fighting for their Identity and Rights after leaving Shelter HomesOrders/Judgments of the MonthArbitrator Can't Grant Relief Contrary To Terms Of Contract: Rajasthan High Court Sets Aside Award Of Compensation For DelayTitle: The State of Rajasthan, through District Collector Pali. & Ors. vs. Sanwariya Infrastructure Private LimitedCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 195The Rajasthan High Court bench comprising Justice Avneesh Jhingan and Justice Bhuwan Goyal have held that an arbitral award which grants reliefs beyond the express terms of the contract, including compensation for losses and interest where no such entitlement exists under the agreement, is patently illegal and liable to be set aside under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.The Court held that awards passed beyond the terms of the contract come within the teeth of grounds available u/s 37 of the Act for interference. It relied upon State of Rajasthan v. Nav Bharat Construction Co., where the Supreme Court held that “An arbitrator cannot go beyond the terms of the contract between the parties. In the guise of doing justice he cannot award contrary to the terms of the contract”.Rajasthan High Court Upholds Mandate On Possession Of 'Crafts Instructor Certificate' For Appointment As Junior TrainerTitle: Komal Kumawat & Ors. v Union of India & Ors., and other connected petitonsCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 196The Rajasthan High Court dismissed the writ petitions filed challenging the constitutional validity of an amendment to the Rajasthan Technical Training Subordinate Service Rules mandating possession of relevant National Craft Instructor Certificates (NCIC)/Crafts Instructor Training Scheme (CITS) Certificate for the post of Junior Instructors.The division bench of Justice Inderjeet Singh and Justice Anand Sharma opined that as per the notification issued by the State to amend the Rules, the requirement of possessing NCIC/CITS certificates were only for those traders where the courses under CITS were available. It was not mandatory in all cases, and an exception was carved out for the contingencies where the courses under CITS were not available.“Merely, for the reason that Schedule sought to be substituted vide Notification dated 01.09.2023 is silent in respect of manner of relaxation to be granted qua possessing NCIC/CITS certificate, even for the trades where CITS courses are not available, would not invalidate the Notification dated 01.09.2023 for the reason that it goes without saying that O.M. dated 30.06.2023 issued by the Central Government would govern the field, where the State Rules are silent.”Possibility Of Accused Benefitting From Victims' Fear In Going To Police Can't Be Ignored: Rajasthan High...

Rajasthan High Court Monthly Digest: June 2025

Nupur Agrawal

Tags