NCLT Delhi Imposes Cost Of Rs. 1 Lakh On Suspended Director

The National Company Law Tribunal ("NCLT"), New Delhi Bench, comprising of Shri Bachu Venkat Balaram Das (Judicial Member) and Shri L.N. Gupta (Technical Member), while adjudicating an application filed in Indian Bank (Erstwhile Allahabad Bank) v Nimitaya Hotel & Resorts Pvt. Ltd., has imposed a cost of Rs. 1 Lakh upon the Suspended Director of Corporate Debtor...

Claim Based On An Uninvoked Bank Guarantee Liable To Be Rejected By RP: NCLT Mumbai

The National Company Law Tribunal ("NCLT"), Mumbai Bench, comprising of Shri H.V. Subba Rao (Judicial Member) and Smt. Anuradha Sanjay Bhatia (Technical Member), while adjudicating an application filed in Mrs. Bhanu Navin Nisar v Vijay Group Realty LLP, has held that a Resolution Professional is legally liable to reject the claim of a creditor arising out of an uninvoked...

Object of S.60(2) IBC Is To Group Together CIRP/ Liquidation Proceedings Before Single Forum: Calcutta High Court

The Calcutta High Court on Monday ruled that the object of Section 60(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is to group together Corporate Insolvency Resolution process (CIRP) or liquidation proceedings of a corporate debtor and insolvency resolution/ liquidation/ bankruptcy proceedings of the corporate or personal guarantor of the same corporate debtor before a single forum...

AA Shall Either Approve Or Reject The Resolution Plan, No Power To Modify It: NCLAT Delhi

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal ("NCLAT"), Principal Bench, comprising of Justice Rakesh Kumar (Judicial Member) and Dr. Ashok Kumar Mishra (Technical Member), while adjudicating an appeal filed in Mathuraprasad C Pandey & Ors. v Partiv Parikh & Anr., has held that when a Resolution Plan is presented before the Adjudicating Authority for approval, it is clear...

IBC Cases Weekly Round-Up: 13th To 18th December 2022

NCLAT Compromise Doubtful, Only To Benefit Related Parties, NCLAT Delhi Upholds Liquidation Of CD Case Title: Bankey Bihari Infrahomes Pvt. Ltd. v Mr. Alok Kumar Kuchchal & Anr. Case No.: Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 718 of 2022 The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal ("NCLAT"), Principal Bench, comprising of Justice Ashok Bhushan (Chairperson),...

Invoking CIRP Would Not Make The Dispute Non-Arbitrable : Delhi High Court

The High Court of Delhi has held that the dispute would not become non-arbitrable merely because the petitioner, before filing the application for appointment of arbitrator, has filed a corporate insolvency application under Section 9 of the IBC. The Court rejected the argument that since the petitioner has filed insolvency application which can only be filed for admitted debt and...

No Clause For Payment Of Interest, OC Can't Add Interest Only To Cross Threshold Limit Of 1 Crore: NCLT Kolkata

The National Company Law Tribunal ("NCLT"), Kolkata Bench, comprising of Shri Rohit Kapoor (Judicial Member) and Shri Balraj Joshi (Technical Member), while adjudicating a petition filed in Khatunaresh Impex Pvt. Ltd. v Jindal (India) Limited, has held that in absence of any contract or agreement between Parties which provides for payment of interest to the Operational Creditor...

High Tension Electricity Connection Of CD Cannot Be Restored Unless Security Deposit Is Paid: NCLAT Delhi

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal ("NCLAT"), Principal Bench, comprising of Justice Ashok Bhushan (Chairperson) and Mr. Barun Mitra (Technical Member), while adjudicating an appeal filed in Kalptaru Steel Rolling Mills Ltd. v Southern Power Distribution Company of A.P. Ltd., has held that the Corporate Debtor is not entitled for restoration of high tension...

IBC Does Not Prohibit An Assignee From Continuing Pending Section 7 Proceedings: NCLAT Delhi

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal ("NCLAT"), Principal Bench, comprising of Justice Ashok Bhushan (Chairperson) and Mr. Barun Mitra (Technical Member), while adjudicating an appeal filed in Siti Networks Ltd. v Assets Care and Reconstruction Enterprises Ltd. & Anr., has held that there is no prohibition in the IBC or any of the Regulations from continuing the proceeding by...

Section 66 Of IBC Does Not Provide For Any Look Back Period For Fraudulent Transactions: NCLAT Chennai

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal ("NCLAT"), Chennai Bench, comprising of Justice M Venugopal (Judicial Member) and Ms. Shreesha Merla (Technical Member), while adjudicating an appeal filed in Mr. Thomas George v K. Easwara Pillai & Ors., has held that the Section 66 of IBC does not provide for any look back period as far as fraudulent transactions...

Compromise Doubtful, Only To Benefit Related Parties, NCLAT Delhi Upholds Liquidation Of CD

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal ("NCLAT"), Principal Bench, comprising of Justice Ashok Bhushan (Chairperson), Dr. Alok Srivastava (Judicial Member) and Mr. Barun Mitra (Technical Member), while adjudicating an appeal filed in Bankey Bihari Infrahomes Pvt. Ltd. v Mr. Alok Kumar Kuchchal & Anr., has upheld the Adjudicating Authority's decision to proceed with liquidation...

NCLT Allahabad Bench Re-Constituted W.E.F 12th December 2022

The Allahabad Bench of National Company Law Tribunal, has been re-constituted vide a Circular dated 07.12.2022 issued by NCLT. The re-constitution has been done in accordance with the Circular of Ministry of Corporate Affairs bearing A22012/6/2021-Ad IV MCA dated 02.12.2022, whereby the Government had notified appointment of new NCLT Members. The re-constitution is effective...