Pledged Shares Held By Corporate Debtor In Subsidiary Are Its Assets, Can't Be Invoked During CIRP Due To Moratorium: NCLT Mumbai

The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Mumbai Bench of Lakshmi Gurung (Judicial Member) and Hariharan Neelakanta Iyer (Technical Member) has held that pledged shares held by the Corporate Debtor in its subsidiary company are assets of the Corporate Debtor and, therefore, cannot be invoked by the pledgee during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process due to the bar under Section 14...

Amounts Reflected In Corporate Debtor's Records Can't Be Rejected Even If No Formal Claims Are Filed Before Resolution Professional: NCLT Mumbai

The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) Mumbai bench of Justice Shri V.G. Bisht and Shri Prabhat Kumar (Member Technical) has held that amounts reflected in the books of the Corporate Debtor cannot be rejected even if no formal claims are filed by the Creditors. This Application has been filed on 03.04.2024 by Union of India Through its Secretary, Department of...

Adjudicating Authority Must Pass Liquidation Order U/S 33(4) Of IBC Upon Breach Of Resolution Plan By Successful Applicant: NCLT Mumbai

The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) Mumbai bench of Lakshmi Gurung (Member Judicial) and Hariharan Neelakanta Iyer (Member Technical) has held that once the Successful Resolution Applicant fails to comply with the terms of the Resolution Plan despite several reminders being given, the Adjudicating Authority is mandated to pass an order of liquidation under section 33(4) of...

Writ Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked When Party Has Already Approached DRT Under SARFAESI Act: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has dismissed a petition while upholding that if a borrower has already approached the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) under the SARFAESI Act, for a one-time settlement, a writ seeking the same relief under Article 226 of the Constitution is not maintainable. Background of the Case The petitioner has availed the credit facilities from the consortium of...

Set-Off Of Fixed Deposit Against Overdraft Based On Pre-CIRP Contract Does Not Violate Section 14 Of IBC: NCLT Bengaluru

The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Bengaluru Bench, has held that the set-off of a fixed deposit against an overdraft, based on an untainted contract entered into before the commencement of the CIRP, does not breach Section 14 of the IBC, nor do such deposits form part of the Corporate Debtor's asset pool. This Application has been filed on 05.11.2024 under section 14 and...

Procedural Direction To File An Affidavit On Ledger Accuracy Is Not Appealable U/S 61 Of IBC: NCLAT Chennai

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Chennai Bench, comprising Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma (Member – Judicial) and Jatindranath Swain (Member – Technical), has held that the procedural direction requiring the appellant to file an affidavit confirming the accuracy of certain ledger transactions could not be appealed. The appeal was preferred u/s 61 of the...

Ratification Of IRP Fees By CoC Can Be Implied From Meeting Minutes And Conduct: NCLAT Chennai

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Chennai Bench, comprising Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma (Member – Judicial) and Jatindranath Swain (Member – Technical), has addressed the question of whether ratification of fees and expenses payable to an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) must be express and recorded formally, or it can be implied from the conduct and minutes...

CIRP Cannot Be Sustained If Default Is Cured Before Admission Of Section 9 Application: NCLAT New Delhi

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, comprising Justice Ashok Bhushan (Chairperson) and Barun Mitra (Member – Technical), has ruled that the application u/s 9 of the IBC, 2016, cannot be sustained if the operational debt is settled before the date of admission. Background of the Case Section 9 IBC application, seeking CIRP of the corporate...

NCLAT Grants Extension Of CIRP Timeline To Enable Voting On Revised Resolution Plan

M/s Shri Ram Switchgears Limited (“Corporate Debtor”) was admitted into Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (“CIRP”) on 29.02.2024. The Adjudicating Authority granted an extension of the CIRP up to 24.05.2025. Before the expiry of the timeline on 24.05.2025, the Committee of Creditors (“CoC”) in its meeting held between 09.05.2025 and 14.05.2025, resolved with 96.94%...

Financial Creditor Can't File Same Claim Twice For Same Loan In Multiple Insolvency Proceedings Without Proper Adjustment: NCLAT

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) New Delhi bench of Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain (Judicial Member), Mr Naresh Salecha (Technical Member) and Mr. Indevar Pandey (Technical Member) has held that a financial creditor is not permitted to file the same claim twice for the same loan in multiple insolvency proceedings without proper adjustment. In the present case, the...

Intervention Application U/S 60(5) Of IBC Can't Be Entertained Beyond Limitation Period Of Three Years: NCLAT

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) New Delhi bench of Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain (Judicial Member) and Mr. Indevar Pandey (Technical Member) has held that Intervention Application under section 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) cannot be entertained beyond the limitation period of 3 years. The present appeal has been filed by the Corporate...

Reopening Case Reserved For Orders Without Hearing Affected Party Violates Principle Of Audi Alteram Partem: NCLAT Chennai

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Chennai Bench, comprising Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma (Member – Judicial) and Jatindranath Swain (Member – Technical), has held that an order reserved for the pronouncement cannot be reopened and altered based on a unilateral mention made by a non-party without hearing the affected party. Background of the Case The appellant filed...