Resolution Plan Approved By CoC Binds All Stakeholders Including Dissenting Financial Creditor: NCLAT

The NCLAT New Delhi bench of Justice Ashok Bhushan (Judicial Member) and Barun Mitra (Technical Member) has held that the Resolution Plan which is approved in commercial wisdom of the CoC binds all stakeholders including the dissenting financial creditor. The commercial wisdom of the CoC approving the Resolution Plan is binding on all Brief Facts The present appeal has been...

Date Of Default In Case Of Personal Guarantor Depends On Terms Of Contract Of Guarantee: NCLAT

The NCLAT New Delhi bench of Justice Ashok Bhushan (Judicial Member), Mr. Arun Baroka (Technical Member) and Barun Mitra (Technical Member) has held that the liability of a borrower and guarantor is co-extensive but the liability of a Guarantor stems from the contract of guarantee and therefore the date of default in the case of the guarantor depends on the terms of...

Non-Admission Of Claim By Resolution Professional Cannot Be Challenged First Time In Appeal Before Appellate Tribunal: NCLAT

The NCLAT New Delhi bench of Justice Ashok Bhushan (Judicial Member) and Mr. Arun Baroka (Technical Member) has held that non admission of claim in the Resolution Plan by the Resolution Plan if not challenged before the Adjudicating Authority cannot be challenged in the appeal before the NCLAT. Brief Facts The present appeal has been filed against an order passed by the NCLT by...

CIRP Can't Be Extended Beyond 330 Days U/S. 12(3) Of IBC Absence Of “Exceptional Circumstances”: NCLAT

The NCLAT bench of Justice Ashok Bhushan (Chairperson) and Arun Baroka (Technical Member) has observed that the maximum timeline prescribed under Section 12(3) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) is 330 days. While this period is directory (not mandatory), an extension beyond 330 days is permissible only in “exceptional circumstances”, where a short time is required to...

Copy Of Other Prospective Resolution Applicants' Plans Cannot Be Shared When Suspended Management Is Also A Resolution Applicant: NCLAT

The NCLAT New Delhi bench of Justice Ashok Bhushan (Judicial Member) and Mr. Barun Mitra (Technical Member) has held that copy of the Resolution Plans submitted by other Prospective Resolution Applicants cannot be shared in advance with the suspended management of the corporate debtor when the suspended management is also a Resolution Applicant. Brief Facts The present appeal has...

Pendency Of Proceedings Before NCLT For Approval Of Scheme Of Arrangement Does Not Preclude Financial Creditor From Filing Petition U/S 7: NCLAT

The NCLAT New Delhi bench of Justice Ashok Bhushan (Judicial Member), Mr. Barun Mitra (Technical Member) and Mr. Arun Baroka (Technical Member) has held that the pendency of proceedings before the NCLT for approval of the scheme of arrangement does not preclude the Financial Creditor to proceed with Section 7 application. The tribunal also held that direction of RBI under Section 35AA...

IBC Weekly Round-Up [9th December To 15th December 2024]

NOMINAL INDEXIndian Renewable Energy Development Agency Limited Versus Waaree Energies Limited and Anr., Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No.1380 of 2024 Suraksha Asset Reconstruction Ltd. Vs. Varsha Bagri, Liquidator of Bharat NRE Coke Ltd., Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 650 of 2024 & I.A. No. 2325 of 2024 Harish Chander Arora Liquidator of Rathi Super Steel Ltd....

Disbursement Of Non Fund-Based Facilities Cannot Be Refused By Lenders When Resolution Plan Contains Clause For Disbursement: NCLAT

The NCLAT New Delhi bench of Justice Ashok Bhushan (Judicial Member), Barun Mitra (Technical Member) and Arun Baroka (Technical Member) has held that Non Fund Based facilities cannot be refused to be disbursed when the approved Resolution Plan contains a clause for their disbursement. Brief Facts These appeals have been filed by the financial creditors against an order passed by...

NCLT Can Allow Date Of Default To Be Amended In CIRP Proceedings: NCLAT

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) bench of Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain (Judicial Member), Mr. Naresh Salecha (Technical Member) and Mr. Indevar Pandey (Technical Member) has held that the NCLT is empowered to allow the parties to amend the pleadings before the final orders in Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) proceedings are passed. In other words, the...

Deposit In Pursuance Of One Time Settlement Proposal Remains Corporate Debtor's Asset If Settlement Fails: NCLAT

The NCLAT New Delhi bench of Justice Yogesh Khanna (Judicial Member) and Mr. Ajai Das Mehrotra (Technical Member) has held that the amount deposited with the bank by the corporate debtor in pursuance of an One Time Proposal to show bonafides will remain assets of the corporate debtor and can be taken into custody by the RP under section 18 of the code when the said proposal...

Secured Creditor Is Liable To Pay Liquidator's Fees Under Rule 21A Of Liquidation Regulations If Option U/S 52 Of IBC Is Exercised: NCLAT

The NCLAT New Delhi bench of Justice Ashok Bhushan (Judicial Member), Barun Mitra( Technical Member) and Arun Baroka (Technical Member) has held that the fee of the liquidator has to be paid within 90 days from the liquidation commencement date as provided under Regulation 21A of the Liquidation Regulations if the secured creditor opts to realise its security interest under section 52 of...

Petition U/S 7 Of IBC Cannot Be Barred For Default Committed Prior To S.10A Period: NCLAT

The NCLAT New Delhi bench of Justice Ashok Bhushan (Judicial Member), Barun Mitra( Technical Member) and Arun Baroka (Technical Member) has held that when default has been committed by the Corporate Debtor prior to Section 10A period, any default committed during the Section 10A period cannot be held to bar the application which is filed on the basis of default prior to Section 10A...