Secured Creditor Is Obligated To Contribute Towards Workmen's Dues When Security Interest Is Realised Under SARFAESI Act: NCLAT

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) New Delhi bench of Justice Ashok Bhushan (Judicial Member), Mr. Barun Mitra (Technical Member) and Mr. Arun Baroka (Technical Member) has held that the obligation to contribute towards workmen dues out of the realised fund cannot be avoided by the Secured Creditor when the security interest has been realised under the SARFAESI Act. Section 52(4) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) permits a secured creditor to realise its security interest as applicable laws. Since in the present case, the security interest was realized under the SARFAESI Act, section 326 of the Companies Act shall be applicable and the realised amount must be distributed accordingly. Brief Facts: The corporate debtor mortgaged its immovable property with the appellant as a guarantor to two borrower companies namely M/s. Pandit Automotive Sangli Private Limited and M/s. Pandit Automotive Satara Private Ltd. On an application filed under Section 7 by Reliance Commercial Finance Limited, Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the corporate debtor commenced on 12.03.2018. The Committee of Creditors (CoC) on 09.07.2018 decided to proceed with the liquidation of the corporate debtor. Adjudicating Authority passed an order on 09.08.2018, directing for liquidation of the corporate debtor. Liquidator on 13.08.2018 published notice inviting claim from stakeholders of the corporate debtor. vi. vii. viii. ix. x. xi. On 04.09.2018, appellant filed its claim that is of ₹60,50,002,003/-. Appellant also sent a letter dated 22.11.2018, intimating liquidator that appellant shall realise its security interest under Section 52(1) of the IBC. Liquidator filed an application I.A. No.4874/2023, under Section 60(5) of the IBC seeking contribution from secured creditors including the appellant who had chosen to exercise their rights to realise the secured interest. The appellant was impleaded as Respondent No. 2 in the application 4874/2023. The Adjudicating Authority heard the liquidator as well as the secured creditor in the application and by impugned order has allowed the application. Contentions: The Appellant submitted that Regulation 21A was inserted in the Liquidation Regulation 2016 only on 25.07.2019, which entitled the liquidator to receive cost of liquidation from secured creditors, who have realised their security interest outside the liquidation which regulation is not applicable in the facts of the present case since the liquidation commenced against the corporate debtor on 09.08.2018. It was further submitted that Adjudicating authority, although in the impugned order has accepted that Regulation 21A does not apply to the facts of the present case but in substance, applied the regulation by directing payments towards the workmen's dues and liquidation cost. Per contra, the Respondent submitted that Appellant has realised its security interest under the provisions of SARFAESI Act, 2002. Appellant is liable to comply the requirement of SARFAESI Act, 2002, under which provisions appellant was liable to contribute towards workmen's dues. Observations: The Tribunal noted that Regulation 21A of the Liquidation Regulation, 2016 has been inserted in regulation with effect from vide notification dated 25.07.2019. In the present case,liquidation proceeding had commenced vide order dated 09.08.2018. Regulation 21A thus is clearly not applicable in the facts of the present case. It further observed that Section 52(1) entitles the secured creditor to realise its security interest in the manner specified in this Section. The Tribunal further observed that sub section 4 of section 52 of the IBC allows the creditor to realise the security interest under the Applicable law and recover dues. Accordingly, the creditor has exercised its right under section 13(2) and 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act to realise its security interest It held that it is an undisputed case of the parties that realization of security interest by appellant is under the SARFAESI Act, 2002. When the appellant has realised its security interest under SARFAESI Act, 2002, it is obviously obliged to follow the provisions of SARFAESI Act, 2002. The Tribunal held that as noted above, section 52(4) of the IBC allows the secured creditor to realise its security interest as per applicable laws. In the present case, the Appellant has chosen to realize its security interest under the SARFAESI Act. Since the security interest has been realised under the SARFAESI Act, section 13(9) of the Act is fully applicable in the present case and sale proceeds shall be distributed as per section 326 of the Companies Act. As per section 326 of the Companies Act, the Appellant is obligated to deposit towards workmen's dues. Coming to the next issue, it observed that the expression insolvency resolution process cost itself is...

Secured Creditor Is Obligated To Contribute Towards Workmen's Dues When Security Interest Is Realised Under SARFAESI Act: NCLAT

Mohd Malik Chauhan

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Mohd Malik Chauhan

Secured Creditor Is Obligated To Contribute Towards Workmen's Dues When Security Interest Is Realised Under SARFAESI Act: NCLAT

Mohd Malik Chauhan

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Mohd Malik Chauhan

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers