Know the Law
![Undivided Share In Joint Family Can Be Disposed By Will As Per Sec.30 Hindu Succession Act : SC [Read Judgment] Undivided Share In Joint Family Can Be Disposed By Will As Per Sec.30 Hindu Succession Act : SC [Read Judgment]](https://www.livelaw.in/h-upload/2019/01/10/500x300_supreme-court-of-india-1.jpg)
Undivided Share In Joint Family Can Be Disposed By Will As Per Sec.30 Hindu Succession Act : SC [Read Judgment]
"Section 30 of the Act, permits the disposition by way of Will of the interest of a male Hindu in a Mitakshara coparcenary property
![SC Explains Difference Between Retrospective And Retroactive Statutes [Read Judgment] SC Explains Difference Between Retrospective And Retroactive Statutes [Read Judgment]](https://www.livelaw.in/h-upload/images/500x300_justice-ak-sikri-justice-ashok-bhushan-justice-abdul-nazeer.jpg)
SC Explains Difference Between Retrospective And Retroactive Statutes [Read Judgment]
"Retroactivity in the context of the statute consists application of new rule of law to an act or transaction which has been completed before the Rule was promulgated."
![SC Permits Wife & Daughters Of Deceased De Facto Complainant To Compound Criminal Case [Read Order] SC Permits Wife & Daughters Of Deceased De Facto Complainant To Compound Criminal Case [Read Order]](https://www.livelaw.in/h-upload/images/500x300_justice-r-banumathi-justice-indira-banerjee.jpg)
SC Permits Wife & Daughters Of Deceased De Facto Complainant To Compound Criminal Case [Read Order]
"Section 320 (4)(b) stipulates that when the person who would otherwise be competent to compound an offence under this Section is dead, the legal representative, as defined in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908) of such person may, with the consent of the Court compound the offence."
![Suspicion, Howsoever Grave, Cant Substitute Proof In Criminal Trial, Reiterates SC [Read Judgment] Suspicion, Howsoever Grave, Cant Substitute Proof In Criminal Trial, Reiterates SC [Read Judgment]](https://www.livelaw.in/h-upload/2019/01/10/500x300_supreme-court-of-india-4.jpg)
Suspicion, Howsoever Grave, Can't Substitute Proof In Criminal Trial, Reiterates SC [Read Judgment]
"Though the materials on record hold some suspicion towards them, but the prosecution has failed to elevate its case from the realm of "may be true" to the plane of "must be true" as is indispensably required in law for conviction on a criminal charge."
![Writ Petition Under Article 227 Challenging Judicial Orders Are Maintainable, But Not Under Article 226: SC [Read Judgment] Writ Petition Under Article 227 Challenging Judicial Orders Are Maintainable, But Not Under Article 226: SC [Read Judgment]](https://www.livelaw.in/h-upload/2019/01/500x300_03justice-ashok-bhushan-and-justice-indu-malhotra.jpg)
Writ Petition Under Article 227 Challenging Judicial Orders Are Maintainable, But Not Under Article 226: SC [Read Judgment]
"The Writ Petition under Article 227 challenging the orders passed by Civil Courts refusing to grant interim injunction under Order XXXIX, Rules 1 and 2 of the CPC could very well be maintainable."
![Former Employee Not Disqualified From Acting As An Arbitrator, Even After 2015 Amendment: SC [Read Judgment] Former Employee Not Disqualified From Acting As An Arbitrator, Even After 2015 Amendment: SC [Read Judgment]](https://www.livelaw.in/h-upload/images/500x300_am-sapre-and-indu-malhotra.jpg)
Former Employee Not Disqualified From Acting As An Arbitrator, Even After 2015 Amendment: SC [Read Judgment]
"The word "other" used in Entry 1, would indicate a relationship other than an employee, consultant or an advisor. The word "other" cannot be used to widen the scope of the entry to include past/former employees"

Motor Accident Claims : 2018 Annual Round Up
This is a compilation of major judgments of 2018 in the field of motor accident claims compensation.Owner as per RTO records liable for accident, if transfer is not recordedIn Naveen Kumar vs Vijay Kumar and others, the SC reiterated the legal position that it is the registered owner of the vehicle as per RTO records who is liable for accident caused by the vehicle. Therefore, even if...

Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code - 2018 Annual Round Up
The year 2018 also witnessed major changes in the field of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code(IBC).While the year 2017 witnessed SC explaining the basic concepts of the nascent legislation, the year 2018 saw SC addressing more complex issues in relation to it.The significant decisions of 2017 were Innoventive Industries v ICICI Ltd and Mobilox Innovations Pvt Ltd v Kirusa Software...
![HCs Cannot Adjudicate Upon Affidavits Or Disputed Questions Of Fact Under Article 226: SC [Read Judgment] HCs Cannot Adjudicate Upon Affidavits Or Disputed Questions Of Fact Under Article 226: SC [Read Judgment]](https://www.livelaw.in/cms/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Justice-R-Banumathi-Justice-Indira-Banerjee-1.jpg)
HCs Cannot Adjudicate Upon Affidavits Or Disputed Questions Of Fact Under Article 226: SC [Read Judgment]
The Supreme Court, on Wednesday, reiterated that high courts cannot adjudicate upon affidavits or disputed questions of fact while hearing petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, except in the “rarest of cases”.A bench comprising Justice R. Banumathi and Justice Indira Banerjee asserted, “ It is well settled that proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution...
![Order Of Acquittal Cannot Be Interfered With On Ground That Different View Is Possible: SC Reiterates [Read Judgment] Order Of Acquittal Cannot Be Interfered With On Ground That Different View Is Possible: SC Reiterates [Read Judgment]](https://www.livelaw.in/cms/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Justice-Nageswara-Rao-Justice-Subhash-Reddy.jpg)
Order Of Acquittal Cannot Be Interfered With On Ground That Different View Is Possible: SC Reiterates [Read Judgment]
The Supreme Court on Tuesday asserted that an order of acquittal cannot be interfered with on the ground that a different view was possible on the basis of evidence available on record.A bench comprising Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Justice R. Subhash Reddy asserted, “Interference with an order of acquittal is not permissible on the ground that a different view is possible. If the acquittal...
![No Regularization When Appointments Were Illegal And Void Ab Initio, Reiterates SC [Read Judgment] No Regularization When Appointments Were Illegal And Void Ab Initio, Reiterates SC [Read Judgment]](https://www.livelaw.in/cms/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Justice-Madan-B-Lokur-Justice-Abdul-Nazeer-Justice-Deepak-Gupta.jpg)
No Regularization When Appointments Were Illegal And Void Ab Initio, Reiterates SC [Read Judgment]
The Supreme Court has reiterated that when the appointments were illegal and void ab initio, the question of regularization of their services by invoking the judgment in Umadevi case does not arise.The bench comprising Justice Madan B. Lokur, Justice S. Abdul Nazeer and Justice Deepak Gupta allowed appeal filed by the State of Bihar against the Patna High Court order directing reinstatement...
![Execution Of A Will Can Be Held To Be Proved When It Is Found To Be Ordinarily Free from Suspicious Circumstances, Reiterates SC [Read Judgment] Execution Of A Will Can Be Held To Be Proved When It Is Found To Be Ordinarily Free from Suspicious Circumstances, Reiterates SC [Read Judgment]](https://www.livelaw.in/cms/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Supreme-court-5.jpg)
Execution Of A Will Can Be Held To Be Proved When It Is Found To Be Ordinarily Free from Suspicious Circumstances, Reiterates SC [Read Judgment]
The Supreme Court has reiterated the settled law that execution of a Will must be held to have been proved not only when the statutory requirements for proving the Will are satisfied but the Will is also found to be ordinarily free from suspicious circumstances.The bench comprising Justice NV Ramana and Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar was considering an appeal (Jarnail Singh vs....
