Allahabad High Court Monthly Digest: October 2022 [Citations 455 - 477]

NOMINAL INDEX Rajendra Kumar And 2 Others v. State Of U.P. Thru Prin Secy Home And Another 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 455 Shahzad v. State of U.P. 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 456 Jitendra @ Jitendra Kumar Singh v. State of U.P 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 457 Ajay Agarwal v. State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 458 Anugrah Narayan Singh v. Harsh Vardhan Bajpayee 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 459 Umesh Pratap Singh v. State Of U.P. And 5 Others 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 460 Kailash v. State of U.P. and other connected appeals 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 461 Tulsarani And Another v. Union Of India And 3 Others 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 462 Azizurrahman v. Hamidunnisha @ Sharifunnisha 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 463 Prveen Kashyap v. State Of U.P. And 3 Others 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 464 Monu v. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 465 Nadeem Ansari v. State of U.P 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 466 Amarjeet v. State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. /Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. Lko. And 4 Others 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 466 Flipkart Internet Private Limited v. State Of U.P. And 3 Others 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 467 State of U.P. v. Govind Pasi along with a connected appeal 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 468 Sujit & Ors. v. State & Ors. 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 469 Naresh Kumar Valmiki v. State of U.P. and others along with connected matters 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 470 Sanjeev @ Kallu Sethiya v. State of U.P. 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 471 Sandeep Kumar And Another v. State Of U.P. And 9 Others 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 472 Lal Bihari Yadav v. Chairman/Sabhapati U.P. Legislative Council Vidhan Bhawan Lko & another 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 473 Mr.X(Minor) v. State Of U.P.And Another 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 474 Lokesh Kumar Khurana and others v. Union of India and others along with connected matters 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 475 Malati Devi v. State Of U.P. And 3 Others 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 476 Rama Nand v. Hira Lal : 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 477 ORDERS/JUDGMENTS OF THE MONTH Bail Can't Be Cancelled Without Giving Notice To Accused, Giving Him An Opportunity Of Being Heard: Allahabad High Court Case title - Rajendra Kumar And 2 Others v. State Of U.P. Thru Prin Secy Home And Another [APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 6779 of 2022] Case Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 455 The Allahabad High Court recently observed that the cancellation of bail cannot be done without giving notice to the accused and giving him an opportunity of being heard. With this, the bench of Justice Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I sets aside the order of the Sessions Judge, Raebareli canceling the bail granted earlier to Rajendra Kumar and 2 others in connection with a criminal case. The High Court noted that the impugned order canceling the bail was passed without issuing notice to the applicants/accused and without affording them a reasonable and sufficient opportunity of hearing and the same was patently illegal being in flagrant violation of Supreme Court rulings. Person Out On Regular Bail Can Be Granted Anticipatory Bail In Added Sections If He Isn't Misusing Liberty: Allahabad High Court Case title - Shahzad v. State of U.P. [CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION US 438 CR.P.C. No. - 9391 of 2022] Case Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 456 The Allahabad High Court has observed that a person who has already been granted regular bail under Section 439 of CrPC and if it found that he has not misused the liberty, then he may be granted anticipatory bail under Section 438 of CrPC in connection with added sections related to the same crime. With this, the bench of Justice Krishan Pahal granted anticipatory bail to one Shahzad in connection with the offence under Section 3/7 of The Essential Commodities Act. A Person Seeking Regular Bail Has To Be In Court's Custody Which Isn't Necessarily Required To Be Physical Custody: Allahabad HC Case title - Jitendra @ Jitendra Kumar Singh v. State of U.P [CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 37894 of 2021] Case Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 457 The Allahabad High Court recently held that it is not mandatory for an accused to be in physical custody at the time of filing the bail application. The Court clarified that if the accused is out of physical custody but his liberty is subject to the conditions imposed by the Court i.e. the accused is in constructive custody, he can apply for regular bail. The bench of Justice Saurabh Vidyarthi observed thus while granting regular bail to one Jitendra who is facing charges under sections 420 and 120B of IPC. The Court noted that he had not been named in the FIR; rather, his name surfaced during the investigation. High Court Of One State Can Grant Transit Bail In A Case Registered Within Jurisdiction Of Another HC: Allahabad High Court Case title - Ajay Agarwal v. State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others [CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1669 of 2022] Case...

Allahabad High Court Monthly Digest: October 2022 [Citations 455 - 477]

Sparsh Upadhyay

Tags