Allahabad High Court Weekly Round-Up: January 16 To January 21, 2023

NOMINAL INDEX Asif Khaliq vs. State Of U.P. And 2 Others 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 16 Saumitra Anand and others vs. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad and others 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 17 Neelam Devi vs. State of U.P. 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 18 Adarsh Bhushan vs. State of U.P 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 19 Arvind Kejriwal vs. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy./Addl.Chief Secy. Home And Another 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 20 Anand Shankar Pandey And 2 Others vs. State Of U.P And Another 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 21 Bhanu Pratap Singh vs. State Of U.P. And 2 Others 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 22 Sanni @ Nitish @ Nitish Agrahari And 2 Others vs. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 23 Nafisa And 4 Others vs. State Of U.P. And 3 Others 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 24 State of U.P. vs. Mukhtar Ansari S/O Subhan Ullah Ansari 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 25 Manjeet Alias Pintoo vs. State of U.P. 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 26 Vijay Masih (Pastor) vs. State Of UP 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 27 Sidhique Kappan vs. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 28 Madan Mohan Saxena vs. State Of U.P. And 2 Others 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 29 Nizamuddin Khan vs. State of U.P. 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 30 Digvijay Chaube vs. State of U.P. 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 31 Orders/Judgments of the week Allahabad High Court Imposes Rs. 1 Lakh Cost On Man For Filing Plea Making False Averments, Suppressing Material Facts Case title - Asif Khaliq vs. State Of U.P. And 2 Others [WRIT - C No. - 16263 of 2022] Case Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 16 The Allahabad High Court imposed a ₹1 lakh cost on a man who filed a writ petition making false averments and suppressing material facts. The bench of Justice Surya Prakash Kesarwani and Justice Jayant Banerji directed the petitioner (Asif Khaliq) to deposit the cost with the High Court Legal Services Committee within two weeks. 'Matter Engaging Attention On Administrative Side': Allahabad HC In PIL Seeking Rational Use Of Paper In UP Courts Case title - Saumitra Anand and others vs. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad and others [PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1891 of 2020] Case Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 17 The Allahabad High Court said that the issue regarding the rational use of paper in all judicial filings in all Courts/judicial forums in the State of UP is engaging the attention of the Court on the administrative size. The bench of Chief Justice Rajesh Bindal and Justice J. J. Munir said so while dismissing a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) plea, inter alia, urging for use of double-printed A4 paper in courts. The Court has, however, welcomed the petitioners to submit suggestions in this regard. 'Substantial' Compliance Of S. 50 NDPS Act Can't Be Ascertained At The Stage Of Bail, But During Trial: Allahabad High Court Case title - Neelam Devi vs. State of U.P. [CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 29318 of 2022] Case Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 18 The Allahabad High Court has observed that at the stage of bail, it is only to be seen whether provisions of Section 50 of the NDPS Act have been prima facie complied with or not and it cannot be precisely ascertained whether compliance with Section 50 of the NDPS Act had been substantially made or not, as the same can only be ascertained during the trial. The bench of Justice Sameer Jain observed thus while dealing with the plea of an NDPS Accused seeking bail on the ground that at the time of search and recovery, the mandatory provisions of Section 50 of the NDPS Act were not complied with. 15% Of School Fee Paid During COVID Period (2020-21) To Be Adjusted/Refunded To Students, Orders Allahabad High Court Case title - Adarsh Bhushan vs. State of U.P [PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 576 of 2020] Case Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 19 The Allahabad High Court directed the private schools to adjust/pay back the excess money (15% of the total fee) that was charged from students during the COVID Pandemic period (2020-21 session). The bench of Chief Justice Rajesh Bindal and Justice J. J. Munir ordered thus while hearing a bunch of petitions filed by aggrieved parents from all over the State seeking regulation of fees in all government and private schools in Uttar Pradesh. Breaking| Allahabad HC Denies Relief To Arvind Kejriwal In Case Over Alleged 'Khuda Believers Won't Be Pardoned If They Vote For BJP' Remark Case title - Arvind Kejriwal vs. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy./Addl.Chief Secy. Home And Another [APPLICATION U/S 482 No.42 of 2023] Case Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 20 The Allahabad High Court upheld the Sultanpur Court's order rejecting Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal's discharge plea filed in connection with a 2014 case registered against him allegedly saying "those who believe in 'Khuda' won't be pardoned by 'Khuda' if they vote for BJP". The bench of Justice Rajesh Singh Chauhan said that it appeared that Kejriwal ...

Allahabad High Court Weekly Round-Up: January 16 To January 21, 2023

Sparsh Upadhyay

Tags