Top
Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
News Updates

Application For Anticipatory Bail By A Juvenile Apprehending Arrest Maintainable:Rajasthan HC [Read Order]

AKSHITA SAXENA
4 Sep 2019 11:56 AM GMT
Application For Anticipatory Bail By A Juvenile Apprehending Arrest Maintainable:Rajasthan HC [Read Order]
x

The Jaipur bench of the Rajasthan High Court has held that an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 of CrPC may be moved by a juvenile apprehending arrest. The Applicant, Surat, a minor, had moved before the high court, through Advocate Dharmendra Gujjar, aggrieved by the order of the subordinate court which dismissed his application for pre-arrest bail on the grounds...

Your free access to Live Law has expired
To read the article, get a premium account.
    Your Subscription Supports Independent Journalism
Subscription starts from
599+GST
(For 6 Months)
Premium account gives you:
  • Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.
  • Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.
Already a subscriber?

The Jaipur bench of the Rajasthan High Court has held that an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 of CrPC may be moved by a juvenile apprehending arrest.

The Applicant, Surat, a minor, had moved before the high court, through Advocate Dharmendra Gujjar, aggrieved by the order of the subordinate court which dismissed his application for pre-arrest bail on the grounds of maintainability, stating that the Applicant was a minor and consequently, the question of his arrest did not arise.

The Applicant, apprehending arrest against an FIR lodged against him under Sections 323, 341 and 354 of IPC, prayed before the high court to allow him to file a fresh application before the subordinate court and to direct the subordinate court to adjudicate his application on merits.

He asserted that an anticipatory bail under Section 438 of CrPC at the instance of a child in conflict with law was maintainable before the high court or the Court of Session. Reliance in this behalf was placed on Mr. X v. State of Kerala, LL.R. 2018 (3) Kerala 161.

Justice Mahendra Maheshwari held that as correctly pointed out by the Applicant, the law on maintainability of an anticipatory bail application moved by a child was settled in the aforementioned precedent. It was held therein that "merely for the reason that Section 10 of the Act provides for apprehending a child in conflict with law and not for arresting him, it cannot be held that an application under Section 438 of the Code by him/her is not maintainable".

The court thus granted liberty to file a fresh application before the subordinate court within 15 days and directed the subordinate court to consider the application on merits. The court also directed the police to not arrest the Applicant until the order of the subordinate court.

The State of Rajasthan was represented by Public Prosecutor Pankaj Agarwal. 

Click here to download the Order


Next Story
Share it