Article 243Q | Governor's Power To Specify Municipality's Transitional Area Circumscribed By Statutory Stipulations: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court has made it clear that the Governor's power under Article 243Q of the Constitution, with respect to specifying transitional area of a Nagar Panchayat, is circumscribed by statutory stipulations.

A Division bench of Justices Manoj Kumar Gupta and Rajendra Kumar-IV observed,

"The Governor while being invested with power to include or exclude any area in a transitional area, or a smaller urban area, in exercise of power under clause (2) of Article 243Q of the Constitution, read with Section 3 of the U.P. Municipalities Act, 1916, has to follow the procedure prescribed under Section 4, which mandates that before issuance of notification under Section 3, a draft proposal has to be published in the manner provided under Section 4, so as to apprise the general public of the inclusions/exclusions and if any person has any objection, he may file objection/suggestion."

Article 243Q of the Constitution confers power upon the Governor to include or exclude any area, as well as power to constitute a Nagar Panchayat, a Municipal Council, or a Municipal Corporation.

The UP Municipalities Act, 1916 prescribes that before including or excluding any area in a transitional area, or a smaller urban area, the proposal has to be notified in terms of Section 4, inviting suggestions and objections and after considering which, final notification is to be issued under Section 3.

The Petitioners, several elected Pradhans, were aggrieved by a notification issued by the Governor, allegedly in defiance of Section 4 of the 1916 Act.

It was their case that initially, a draft proposal in compliance of Section 4 was circulated for inclusion of ten villages in the transitional area of Nagar Panchayat, Badahalganj, Gorakhpur. However subsequently, a final notification was issued including seven more villages, which were not part of draft notification.

This move, as per the Petitioners, rendered Section 4 of the Act redundant. It was submitted that the area, as notified in the draft proposal, cannot be increased while issuing the final notification.

The State on the other hand argued that seven villages have been included in the final notification on the basis of objections and suggestions received in pursuance of the preliminary notification.

The High Court noted that Section 3 explicitly and unequivocally prescribes that the notification shall be subject to being issued after the previous publication required by Section 4, whose object is to provide opportunity to the general public to file objections against the proposal.

The Court found that the Governor's action of notifying seven villages in the transitional area without there being any previous publication, as required by Section 4, is nothing but colourable exercise of power.

In view of the above, the Court declared the impugned notification unconstitutional and quashed it.

Case Title: Sujit & Ors. v. State & Ors.

Citation: 

Appearance: Senior Advocate Anoop Trivedi, Advocates Abhinav Gaur and Vibhu Rai for Petitioners; Additional Chief Standing Counsel Rajiv Gupta for State

Click Here To Download Order