Right To Withdraw Notice Of Voluntary Retirement Before Intended Date Lost By Accepting Post-Retiral Benefits: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court bench of Justices A.S. Chandurkar and G.A. Sanap recently held that an employee who is entitled under the applicable laws to withdraw his offer of voluntary retirement before the intended date of such voluntary retirement, loses his right to do so by accepting the retirement benefits.The petitioner, who was serving as 'Assistant Manager' with the erstwhile Corporation Bank which has now merged with Union Bank of India (the Bank), had challenged the communication dated 15.05.2020 issued to him by the Bank by virtue of which he was informed that his services were relieved on 14.09.2017 under the Voluntary Retirement Scheme and in accordance with the Corporation Bank (Employees') Pension Regulations, 1995 (the Pension Regulations, 1995).Consequently, the petitioner prayed that his applications dated 13.09.2017 and 12.03.2020 be accepted and he be permitted to withdraw his notice of resignation/ voluntary retirement. The petitioner further prayed for his reinstatement in service with continuity and full back wages. The court noted that from the material on record three questions arise for determination: firstly whether the request for voluntary retirement as made by the petitioner on 23.08.2017 which was accepted by the Bank on 06.09.2017 by stating that voluntary retirement would come into effect on 14.09.2017 could have been withdrawn prior to that date despite its acceptance? If the answer to the aforesaid question is in the affirmative, the second question is as regards the effect of non-consideration of the petitioner's request for withdrawing the letter of voluntary retirement and lastly, whether the petitioner is entitled for the relief of reinstatement having accepted monetary benefits flowing from his voluntary retirement?The first question was answered in the affirmative. Considering the provisions of the Pension Regulations and especially Clause 29(4) thereof coupled with the legal position settled by various precedents, the Court held that it was open for the petitioner to make a request for withdrawing his notice of voluntary retirement prior to the intended date of retirement, notwithstanding the fact that such request was accepted by the Bank.Regulation 29 (4) of the Pension Regulations, 1995 reads as under: "An employee, who has elected to retire under this regulation and has given necessary notice to that effect to the appointing authority, shall be precluded from withdrawing his notice except with the specific approval of such authority. Provided that the request for such withdrawal shall be made before the intended date of his retirement."The court observed that an employee who has given notice to retire under the Regulation can withdraw such notice subject to approval of the Appointing Authority provided such request for withdrawal is made before the intended date of the retirement. Reliance was placed on Power Finance Corporation Limited vs. Promodkumar Bhatia (1997) SCC 280 the Supreme Court has held in clear terms that as long as the employee is not relieved of his duties on acceptance of the offer of voluntary retirement or resignation, the jural relationship of employee and the employer does not come to an end. The Court further took note of Shambhu Murari Sinha vs. Project and Development India Ltd. and another (2002) 3 SCC 437 where this position has been reiterated by stating that even after acceptance of the application for voluntary retirement given by an employee, he continues to have locus poenitentiae to withdraw his notice for voluntary retirement. In response to the second question, the court referred to the decision of the Supreme Court in Balram Gupta vs. Union of India AIR 1987 SC 2354. While considering the validity of Rule 48(4) of the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 which is somewhat similar to Regulation 29(4) it was held that the approving authority must act reasonably and rationally while considering the request for withdrawing the notice of voluntary retirement. Approval is not the ipse dixit of the approving authority. This decision has been relied in Arun Shankarrao Deshpande vs. District and Sessions Judge, Akola 1993 Mh.L.J. 1642 where the validity of similarly worded Rule 66(5) of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 was challenged. It was held that the appointing authority is required to give good and valid reasons for not granting approval to the withdrawal of notice of retirement. In this backdrop, the High Court said that it is open for the Appointing Authority to refuse to grant approval to the withdrawal of the notice of voluntary retirement for valid and good reasons, the approval cannot be the ispe dixit of the Appointing Authority. In the present case, the Court noted that the Appointing Authority failed to consider the request of the petitioner for withdrawing the notice of voluntary retirement though it was open for it to refuse such...

Right To Withdraw Notice Of Voluntary Retirement Before Intended Date Lost By Accepting Post-Retiral Benefits: Bombay High Court

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

Right To Withdraw Notice Of Voluntary Retirement Before Intended Date Lost By Accepting Post-Retiral Benefits: Bombay High Court

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers