Breaking: 'State Gov Transgressed Limit Of Delegation': Calcutta High Court Holds WB Govt's 'Duare Ration Scheme' To Be Illegal

Aaratrika Bhaumik

28 Sep 2022 10:28 AM GMT

  • Breaking: State Gov Transgressed Limit Of Delegation: Calcutta High Court Holds WB Govts Duare Ration Scheme To Be Illegal

    In a significant judgment delivered on Wednesday, a Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court has held that the West Bengal 'Duare Ration Scheme' under which the State government delivers foodgrains through the public distribution system at the doorsteps of beneficiaries is illegal and ultra vires the National Food Security Act, 2013 (NFS Act).The meal scheme was part of Chief Minister...

    In a significant judgment delivered on Wednesday, a Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court has held that the West Bengal 'Duare Ration Scheme' under which the State government delivers foodgrains through the public distribution system at the doorsteps of beneficiaries is illegal and ultra vires the National Food Security Act, 2013 (NFS Act).

    The meal scheme was part of Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee's election manifesto promising free ration at doorstep to beneficiaries. 

    A Division Bench comprising Justice Aniruddha Roy and Justice Chitta Ranjan Dash underscored,

    "We are, therefore, constrained to hold that the State Government has transgressed the limit of delegation by obliging the Fair Price Shop dealers to distribute the rations to the beneficiaries at their doorstep in absence of any authority to that effect in the enabling Act i.e. 'NFS Act'. If the 'NFS Act' is amended by the wisdom of the Union Legislature i.e. Parliament for doorstep delivery of food grains to the beneficiaries or invest any such power to the State Government then only such a scheme can be made by the State and that can be said to be in sync with the enabling Act."

    Background

    The Division Bench was adjudicating upon two appeals from two single judge orders wherein the vires of the meal scheme of the West Bengal Government were upheld.

    Justice Moushumi Bhattacharya vide order dated December 23, 2021, had upheld the meal scheme by opining that a reform in the targeted public distribution system and a welfare scheme formulated for reaching food and nutritional security is a necessity-driven measure to tide over the extant existential challenge.

    Similarly, Justice Krishna Rao had observed that on reading of the NFSA, 2013 and the rules framed there under as well as the statutory orders issued under Section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, there is nothing to show that the State Governments are not entitled to extend a benefit to the beneficiaries under the NFSA, 2013.

    Observations

    Pursuant to a perusal of the rival submissions, the Court noted that the concerned Single Judges in the impugned orders passed have not properly construed the 'benefits' spoken of within the meaning of "welfare scheme" that the State can undertake and the role assigned to the State Government in different provisions of the National Food Security Act, 2013. 

    The Court noted that the outer limit of delivery that has been stipulated in the enabling Act i.e. the National Food Security Act, 2013 only extends to and ends at the doorstep of the fair price shop. Therefore, it was held that the State government on the pretext of welfare or to supplement the enabling Act cannot transgress that outer limit by providing benefits from the fair price shop to the doorstep of the ration card holder.

    Opining that the wisdom of the legislature cannot be questioned and statutory provisions cannot be transgressed, the Bench underscored, 

     "The sovereign parliament in their wisdom have fixed the outer limit of delivery of foodstuffs after due regard to the aims and objectives of the Act. Various provisions have been made, which are essentially "machinery provisions" for proper monitoring, check on pilferage and reach out of the benefits to actual beneficiaries. The wisdom of the legislature cannot be questioned as to why fair price shop was chosen by the Act as outer limit of delivery and why they did not explore little further to fix it at the doorstep of the beneficiaries. We cannot hold that the distance from the fair price shop to the doorstep of the beneficiaries is an unexplored distance or an extra mile only. The legislature has not covered this extra mile or unexplored distance in it's wisdom that legislative wisdom can neither be questioned in "Judicial Review" nor the gap can be filled up by exercise of plenary power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India."

    Accordingly, the Court held that the State Government in making the "Duare Ration Scheme" has exceeded the limit of delegation by the enabling Act and that it is ultra vires the 'National Food Security Act, 2013. 

    Case Title: Sekh Abdul Majed v. State of West Bengal & Ors

    Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Cal) 311  

    Click Here To Read/Download Order


    Next Story