7th Jharkhand Public Service Commission Exams: Whether Age Relaxation Can Be Granted Or Not? Supreme Court To Consider

The Supreme Court has issued notice in a special leave petition challenging Jharkhand High Court's order of dismissing the appeal seeking modification in the cut off date for determining age limit to appear in the 7th Jharkhand Public Service Commission. Considering the fact that since for the last 5 years no examination was conducted, the division bench of Justices MR Shah and AS Bopanna in their order observed that, "Issue notice, returnable on 22.09.2021, only to consider the prayer of the petitioners whether as a one time measure, considering the fact that since last five years no examination was conducted, the age relaxation can be granted or not." Facts Of The Case State of Jharkhand had issued an advertisement dated February 26, 2020 for Combined Civil Service Competitive Examination 2017, 2018 and 2019 in which a suitable relaxation was given for computing the upper age limit as on August 1, 2011 for all the clubbed vacancies following the pattern adopted in earlier six consecutive yearly vacancies. The said vacancies due to CoVID 19 were not finalised and in the meantime, the State notified Jharkhand Combined Civil Services Examination Rules 2021 ("Rules, 2021") which were to be applicable prospectively. JPSC thereafter advertised Jharkhand Combined Civil Services Competitive Exam, 2021 and as per clause 4 of the said Advertisement, the upper age limit had to be calculated on the basis of cut off date as on August 1, 2016. Case Before Single Judge Bench Of High Court Aggrieved, the petitioners approached the High Court for declaring proviso to rule 4 of Rules 2021 contrary to Rule 3(IV) and for declaring that there was an abrupt departure of cut off date for counting the upper age limit to Appear in Jharkhand Combined Civil Services Competitive Exam 2021. The Single judge bench of Justice Rajesh Shankar on March 15, 2021 refused to interfere with the decision with respect to cut off date for computation of upper age limit. The High Court also observed that, "Thus, mere fact that at some point of time, any vacancy was advertised, does not by itself gives the aspirant to be appointed on a particular post. Even after completion of the selection process, the candidates coming in the merit list do not have any vested right to seek appointment only for the reason that their names appear in the same. In the present case, since the vacancy advertised in the year 2020 was subsequently cancelled due to the situation beyond control of the authority, the petitioners cannot claim any right by mere publication of the same." Case Before Division Bench of High Court Assailing the order passed by the Single Judge bench, the petitioners filed a letter patent appeal on the ground that all the eligible candidates who were left would have subsisting right under Article 16 of the Constitution if any vacancy arose in a particular year but could not be filled up, and that any attempt to exclude those candidates would be an aberration of the constitutional mandate. It was also contended that though the State had the discretionary power to fix the cut-off date for computing the age, yet the said discretion could not be exercised arbitrarily, rather must be based on rational thinking. The State on the other hand contended that the Government had taken a rational decision in fixing the cut off date for the age calculation because the candidates belonging to unreserved category having completed minimum age limit of 21 years and maximum age limit of about 40 years on the aforesaid cut-off dates could be included and, therefore, the age relaxation was almost similar in 6th Combined Civil Services Examination and the 7th Combined Civil Services Examination, 2021. The division bench of Chief Justice Dr Rajiv Ranjan and Justice Sujit Narayan while upholding Single Judge's order on August 25, 2021 observed that, "The writ petitioners, from the threshold, are seeking benefit of relaxation in pursuance to advertisement No.01/2021 so far as it relates to the vacancies of the year 2017, 2018 and 2019 are concerned, which has been readvertised in pursuance to the Rules, 2021 and accordingly, this submission is hereby rejected." Case Title: Reena Kumari v. Jharkhand Public Service Commission Click Here To Read/ Download Order

7th Jharkhand Public Service Commission Exams: Whether Age Relaxation Can Be Granted Or Not? Supreme Court To Consider

Shruti Kakkar

Tags