Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: February 20 To February 26, 2023

Citations 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 161 to 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 182NOMINAL INDEXWINZO GAMES PRIVATE LIMITED v. GOOGLE LLC & ORS 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 161 PARMINDER SINGH v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 162 JAI A. DEHADRAI AND ANR v. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 163 BHUPINDER SINGH & ANR. v. LT GOVERNOR OF DELHI & ORS. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 164 Asad Mueed & Anr versus Hammad Ahmed & Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 165 HARSHPAL SINGH SAWHNEY & ORS v. CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION & ORS 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 166 SARWAR RAZA v. OMBUDSMAN RBI & ANR. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 167 Delhi Waqf Board v. Union of India & Ors 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 168 PUNJAB KESARI PUBLISHING HOUSE PVT LTD & ANR vs AJIT SINGH BULAND & ORS 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 169 M/s. Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd & Anr. versus Shipra Estate Ltd 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 170 D Narasimha Rao & Ors versus Revanta Multi State CGHS Ltd & Anr. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 171 HARDIK KAPOOR v. BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA & ORS 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 172 MALVIKA CHOUDHARY & ORS. v. BAR COUNCIL OF DELHI & ANR. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 173 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION v. REHMAN AFTAB ALAM 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 174 UNION OF INDIA & ANR. v. CR 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 175 Shyam Jaju & Anr. v. Saurabh Bhardwaj & Ors. LiveLaw (Del) 176 TTK Prestige Ltd versus KK & Company Delhi Pvt Ltd & Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 177 MOHD. MANAN DAR v. NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY and other connected matters 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 178 Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd vs M/s Zillion Infraprojects Pvt Ltd 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 179 Bolt Technology OU versus Ujoy Technology Private Limited & Anr. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 180 DEVENDRA KUMAR & ORS. v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 181 KAMALJEET SEHRAWAT v. OFFICE OF LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR OF DELHI & ORS. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 182Google's Warning For Third-Party APK Files An Industry Practice, Doesn't Infringe Trademark: Delhi High Court Rejects WinZo Games' PleaTitle: WINZO GAMES PRIVATE LIMITED v. GOOGLE LLC & ORSCitation: 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 161The Delhi High Court has observed that the warning displayed by Google to users before they download WinZo's APK file is in the nature of disclaimer to caution them and does not result in trademark infringement of gaming platform.Justice Amit Bansal observed that the reference to the name of the APK file or application “WinZO” in Google’s disclaimer is only for identifying the file being downloaded for purpose of warning.The court dismissed an application moved by Winzo Games Private Limited seeking to restrain Google from displaying the warning "against" use of its gaming application “WinZO Games” on the Android Operating System.India Has Taken Huge Strides In Providing Medical Facilities, Courts Can’t Decide On Procurement Of Instruments In Hospitals: Delhi High CourtTitle: PARMINDER SINGH v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORSCitation: 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 162Observing that India has taken huge strides in providing medical facilities with latest technologies and qualified professionals at accessible costs, the Delhi High Court has said that courts cannot take decision on procurement of instruments in hospitals as it is a matter of policy.A division bench of Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Subramonium Prasad dismissed a public interest litigation moved by one Parminder Singh seeking directions for ensuring availability of video laryngoscopes in the healthcare system to manage difficult intubation systems.Delhi Govt’s Decision To Cap Number Of Visits By Family Members, Legal Advisers With Prisoners Not Arbitrary: High CourtTitle: JAI A. DEHADRAI AND ANR v. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANRCitation: 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 163The Delhi High Court has said that Delhi Government's decision to restrict the total number of visits by family members, relatives, friends and legal advisers with jail inmates to two times a week, keeping in view the number of undertrials and prisoners, cannot be said to be arbitrary.A division bench of Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Subramonium Prasad said that the decision has been taken after “careful consideration” of the facilities available in jails, availability of the staff and the number of undertrials.Can’t Direct CAG To Conduct Special Audit Of Finances Of Delhi Sikh Gurdwara Management Committee: High Court Rejects PILTitle: BHUPINDER SINGH & ANR. v. LT GOVERNOR OF DELHI & ORS.Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 164The Delhi High Court Monday dismissed a public interest litigation seeking direction for a “special audit” of Delhi Sikh Gurdwara Management Committee and Guru Harkrishan Public School Society by Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG).A division bench of Justice Manmohan and Justice Saurabh Banerjee observed that the PIL is not maintainable as there is already an applicable law in place, Delhi Sikh Gurdwaras Act, 1971, which provides a complete methodology and mechanism for carrying out an audit by Chartered Accountants after due nomination by the Committee...

Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: February 20 To February 26, 2023

Nupur Thapliyal

Tags