Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: November 14 To November 20, 2022

Citations 2022 [LiveLaw (Del) 1078 TO 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1093]NOMINAL INDEXIBIBO Group Pvt. Ltd. Versus DCIT 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1078HAMDARD NATIONAL FOUNDATION (INDIA) & ANR. v. AMAZON INDIA LIMITED & ANR. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1079LT FOODS LIMITED v. SARASWATI TRADING COMPANY 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1080SHER SINGH @ RAJ BOHARA v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1081Tricolor Hotels Limited v. Dinesh Jain 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1082Sandeep Singh versus Simran Sodhi & Ors. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1083UDDHAV THACKERAY v. THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA & ANR. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1084PCIT Versus PGF Ltd. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1085COLLEGE OF APPLIED EDUCATION AND HEALTHSCIENCES v. NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1086STAR INDIA PVT LTD AND ANR v. PIKASHOW APPLICATION AND ORS 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1087SUDHARSHAN KUMAR SHARMA AND ANR. v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1088STAR INDIA PVT LTD & ANR. v. MOVIESGHAR.ART & ORS. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1089Ram Kripal Singh Construction Pvt. Ltd. v. NTPC 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1090ABDUL MAJEED BABA v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1091ACTION COMMITTEE UNAIDED RECOGNIZED PRIVATE SCHOOL v. DIRECTOR (EDUCATION) & ANOTHER 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1092Vikram Bhatnagar v. ACIT 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 10931. Delhi High Court Stays Reassessment Order Against IBIBO GroupCase Title: IBIBO Group Pvt. Ltd. Versus DCITCitation: 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1078The Delhi High Court has stayed the reassessment order against an online travel agent, IBIBO Group, and issued a notice to the income tax department."The Assessing Officer is permitted to pass the reassessment order, yet the same shall not be given effect to and shall be subject to further orders to be passed by this Court," the division bench of Justice Manmohan and Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora ordered.2. Pakistani Rooh Afza Removed From Amazon India, Delhi High Court Passes Permanent Injunction In Favour Of Hamdard DawakhanaCase Title: HAMDARD NATIONAL FOUNDATION (INDIA) & ANR. v. AMAZON INDIA LIMITED & ANR.Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1079After ordering Amazon to remove the listings of Pakistan-manufactured Rooh Afza from its platform in India, the Delhi High Court has passed a permanent injunction in favour of Hamdard National Foundation (India) restraining various sellers from offering the infringing products.Hamdard National Foundation and Hamdard Laboratories India (Hamdard Dawakhana) had earlier filed a suit against Amazon and some sellers which were offering the products of its Pakistani counterpart on the e-commerce site in India. Justice Prathiba M. Singh on September 5 had directed Amazon to remove the listings of infringing products from its Indian website within 48 hours and provide details of the sellers to Hamdard. 3. Delhi HC Permanently Restrains Raipur Company From Selling Counterfeit 'Daawat' Products, Awards ₹25 Lakhs Damages To Basmati Rice BrandTitle: LT FOODS LIMITED v. SARASWATI TRADING COMPANYCitation: 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1080Permanently restraining a Raipur-based seller from manufacturing and selling counterfeit 'DAAWAT' branded products, the Delhi High Court has awarded Rs. 25 lakhs as damages and costs in favour of the famous basmati rice brand manufacturer LT Foods Limited in a trademark infringement suit.Justice Pratibha M Singh observed that Saraswati Trading Company, based in Chattisgarh's Raipur city, is using a "counterfeit packaging" identical to Daawat brand wherein it is selling Jawaphool Rice and portraying it as Basmati Rice."These are goods for human consumption. Considering the Plaintiff's reputation and the fact that 'DAAWAT' is a well-known mark in India, the suit is liable to be decreed," the court said.4. Delhi HC Asks Registrar General To Expeditiously Explore Possibility Of Creating Software To Preserve Right To Default BailTitle: SHER SINGH @ RAJ BOHARA v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI)Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1081The Delhi High Court has asked its Registrar General to expeditiously implement a 2018 verdict wherein he was requested to explore the possibility of creation of a database for district courts to ensure preservation of right of default bail of the accused.Justice Anu Malhotra referred to the observations made in Arvind Kumar Saxena v. State wherein she had requested the Registrar General to create the database on various dates in relation to pending remand applications before the trial courts, the dates of arrest and by when the chargesheet is to be filed or has been filed.The court in the 2018 verdict had observed that such a database or software would enable the trial courts to inform the accused appearing before them that they are entitled to the indefeasible right of default bail and may exercise the same if he or she is willing to furnish bail.5. Period Of Limitation For The Appointment Of Substitute Arbitrator Begins On The Date Of His Recusal/Removal, Date Of Knowledge Is Irrelevant: Delhi High CourtCase Title: Tricolor Hotels Limited v....

Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: November 14 To November 20, 2022

Nupur Thapliyal

Tags