News Updates

Family Courts Should Be Given The Jurisdiction To Deal With Offences Relating To Marriages: Justice Ramana

Sanjay Sahay
23 Sep 2019 4:03 AM GMT
Family Courts Should Be Given The Jurisdiction To Deal With Offences Relating To Marriages: Justice Ramana
Your free access to Live Law has expired
To read the article, get a premium account.
    Your Subscription Supports Independent Journalism
Subscription starts from
(For 6 Months)
Premium account gives you:
  • Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.
  • Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.
Already a subscriber?

Supreme Court judge Justice NV Ramana on Saturday forwarded a host of suggestions for improving performance of family court while stating that disturbance in family life cripples the efficiency of individual and the development of society. He added due to circumstances beyond the individual's control disturbance in family life is growing.

Justice Raman was speaking at the two-day 1st Regional Training Programme for Sensitization of Family Court Judges in Ranchi. Supreme Court judges Justice R Banumathi and Justice Indira Banerjee, Chief Justice of Delhi High Court Justice DN Patel, Acting Chief Justice of Jharkhand High Court HC Mishra, High Court judge Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh and Justice S Chandrasekhar along with judges of eastern and northeastern India took part in the function.

During his speech, Justice Ramana proposed 37 proposals in various fields including legislation, investigation and prosecution and working of family court.

Some of the suggestions for legislative changes:

1. Family court should be provided jurisdiction to deal with offences against women relating to marriage under Chapter XX and XXA of IPC.

2. As sustenance of family is at state, the rigour of Dowry Prohibition Act and section 498 A of IPC needs to be reconsidered.

3. Summary procedure for family courts requires to be made compulsory.

5 Inclusion of more scientific measures for the determination of paternity and maternity disputes.

6. A comprehensive domestic law needs to be enacted further.

7. Abnormal delays in realization of maintenance to deserted wives and children should be avoided.

8. Deserted wives and children of non-resident husband/father are really left without any legal remedy due to non-service of notice. In these cases remedial international understanding and convention should be evolved.

9. Making pre-litigation mediation/ conciliation mandatory before matter is placed before family court.

Suggestion for improvement of investigative machinery

1. Having separate Mahila courts for exclusively trying offences against women needs to be propagated.

2. More Mahila police stations need to be established.

3. Offences against women should be investigated into by woman police officer.

Suggestion for improving the working of family court

1. The state government in consultation with high courts should make appropriate rules to appoint sufficient number of counselors, psychiatrists and experts to assist the family court.

2. Family courts should be encouraged to use the liberty laid down in its procedures to arrive at a settlement.

3. Family court should be made to invariably conduct proceedings in-camera to help parties resolve their disputes in a free atmosphere.

4. Family court should provide legal assistance to litigations who are not able to engage advocates.

Addressing the gathering Justice R Banumati said that immediate arrest of family member in a dispute related to 498 A thwarts the process of reconciliation adding the police needs to undergo reorientation programme on this aspect. Justice Indira Banerjee said that it's the child who is worst sufferer in a family dispute.

Next Story