Fixation Of Minimum Value Does Not Disable A Land Owner From Getting The Actual Market Value If The Same Is Above The Minimum Value: Chhattisgarh HC

The division bench of the High Court of Chhattisgarh, Chief Justice P R Ramachandra Menon and Justice Parth Prateem Sahu, while dealing with an appeal regarding land acquisition said that, the minimum value insisted to be reckoned for the stamp duty payable under the Stamp Act need not necessarily reflect the actual market value always. The court added, it does not mean that a bonafide purchaser cannot show the actual value and pay the requisite stamp duty accordingly. The appeals arose from a judgment dated 18.09.2018 passed by the learned judge of the High Court of Chhattisgarh declining to interfere with the course of action pursued by the Competent Authority as to fixation of compensation in respect of the compulsory acquisition of land. The crux of the grievance projected by the Appellants is with regard to sustainability of the Award granting only a sum of 16,97,430/- in respect of 1370 sq.mt. of agricultural land situated on the side of the National Highway, while granting a sum of Rs. 65,01,600/- in respect of a piece of land having an extent of 144 sq.mt and such other higher amounts in respect of similar lesser extents situated by side or nearby, wrongly applying the formula for fixing the compensation; which is stated as contrary to the scheme of enactment and binding precedents rendered by the Apex court. The learned counsel for the Appellants submitted that, under Section 26(1) of the Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 clearly states that the Competent authority is bound to reckon the higher market value by adopting the 'three' different criteria mentioned under clauses (a), (b) and ( c) and by ignoring the average sale price for similar type of land situated in the nearest village or nearest vicinity/area and fixing the same detrimental to the interest of the land owner having higher extent of land is not correct and proper. Section 26 of the Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 reads as follows: ""26. Determination of market value of land by Collector.-(1) The Collector shall adopt the following criteria in assessing and determining the market value of land, namely:- (a) the market value, if any, specified in the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (2 of 1899) for the registration of sale deeds or agreements to sell, as the case may be, in the area, where the land is situated; or (b) the average sale price for similar type of land situated in the nearest village or nearest vicinity area; or (c) consented amount of compensation as agreed upon under sub-section(2) of section 2 in case of acquisition of lands for private companies or for public private partnership projects, which ever is higher: Provided that the date for determination of market value shall be the date on which the notification has been issued under section 11. Explanation 1.- The average sale price referred to in clause (b) shall be determined taking into account the sale deeds or the agreements to sell registered for similar type of area in the near village or near vicinity area during immediately preceding three years of the year in which such acquisition of land is proposed to be made. Explanation 2.- For determining the average sale price referred to in Explanation 1, one half of the total number of sale deeds or the agreements to sell in which the highest sale price has been mentioned shall be taken into account. Explanation 3.- While determining the market value under this section and the average sale price referred to in Explanation 1 or Explanation 2, any price paid as compensation for land acquired under the provisions of this Act on an earlier occasion in the district shall not be taken into consideration. Explanation 4.- While determining the market value under this section and the average sale price referred to in Explanation 1 or Explanation 2, any price paid, which in the opinion of the Collector is not indicative of actual prevailing market value may be discounted for the purposes of calculating market value. (2) The market value calculated as per sub-section (1) shall be multiplied by a factor to be specified in the First Schedule. (3) Where the market value under sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) cannot be determined for the reason that - the land is situated in such area where the transactions in land are restricted by or under any other law for the time being in force in that area; or the registered sale deeds or agreements to sell as mentioned in clause (a) of sub-section (1) for similar land are not available for the immediately preceding three years; or (c) the market value has not been specified under the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (2 of 1899) by the appropriate authority, the State Government concerned shall specify the floor price or minimum price per unit area of the said land based on the price calculated in the manner specified in sub-section (1) in respect of similar...

Fixation Of Minimum Value Does Not Disable A Land Owner From Getting The Actual Market Value If The Same Is Above The Minimum Value: Chhattisgarh HC

Arabhi Anandan

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Arabhi Anandan

Fixation Of Minimum Value Does Not Disable A Land Owner From Getting The Actual Market Value If The Same Is Above The Minimum Value: Chhattisgarh HC

Arabhi Anandan

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Arabhi Anandan

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers