Investigation Against KIIFB At Preliminary Stage; Issuance Of Summons Do Not Violate Right: ED Tells Kerala High Court

The Enforcement Directorate has filed the counter affidavit in relation to its probe against the Kerala Infrastructure Investment Fund Board (KIIFB), with respect to the latter's alleged violations of the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) by the issuance of "Masala Bonds" in 2019. Apart from the KIIFB, Dr. Thomas Issac, who was the Finance Minister during the issuance of Masala Bonds by KIIFB, had also approached the High Court challenging the summons issued to him, contending that the agency was seeking to conduct a "fishing and roving" enquiry against him without revealing what the exact nature of violations are. In the Counter filed through the Central Government Counsel, Jaishanker V. Nair, it was averred that the plea moved in the Kerala High Court by KIIFB challenging ED's investigation and terming it a 'smear campaign', was a premature one, considering that the investigation was still at a preliminary stage. It was stated that the petitioners were attempting to evade their duty in cooperating with the investigation by filing the instant petition. It has further been averred by the respondent that the issuance of summons to record evidence in an ongoing investigation was the proper course envisaged under Section 37 of FEMA, and the same could not be termed as being violative of the Fundamental Rights of the petitioner. It was submitted that the instant probe had been initiated on the basis of the complaints that it had received regarding KIIFB's violation of FEMA in issuance of Masala Bonds, and secondly, the observations regarding non-adherence of Constitutional provisions with respect to the Masala Bonds, and KIIFB borrowings in the State Finance Audit Report of the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) in March 2019. It was submitted that under Section 37 of FEMA, the officers of ED, not below the rank of Assistant Director, were empowered to exercise the power of investigation, the power of summons, search and seizure, and enforcing the attendance of any person for the purposes of investigation. This power was argued by the respondents as being identical to that vested upon Income Tax Officer under Section 131 of the Income Tax Act. The decision in K.A. Manshoor v. Assistant Director, ED, wherein it had been held by the Madras High Court that under Section 37 of FEMA, a person summoned by ED could not challenge the issuance of summons was also relied upon by the respondent in their counter to strengthen their argument. Additionally, the respondents have also placed reliance upon the decision in V. Datchinamurthy & Anr. v. Assistant Director of Inspection (Intelligence), IT Department & Ors., wherein the Madras HC had held that, "the issuance of summons will in no way affect the fundamental rights of a person as it is only for the preliminary investigation, and for production of documents before the authority for further investigation". The ED has therefore submitted that in the instant case, the summons had been issued at the preliminary stage of the investigation for the purposes of production of documents, and recording of oral evidence for further investigation, as per the procedure envisaged in FEMA. It has been averred that the same does not affect the rights of the person in any manner since its only for investigation purposes. "As the summons is issued by the legitimate exercise of powers conferred by law, there is not even an iota of unreasonableness, arbitrariness, or non-application of mind in the present case", it has been averred in the counter. Importantly, it was submitted by the ED that the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) had only given its permission to the issuance of Masala Bonds, and that the ED was empowered under Section 37(1) of FEMA to take up for investigation any contravention regarding the same under Section 13 of the Act. It was further pointed out that the Chief Executive Officer of KIIFB, KM Abraham, and Joint Fund Manager, Ani Jula Thomas, who are the second and third petitioners respectively, were issued summons by the ED in this regard for production of documents and oral evidence, and that in the absence of the same, the investigation and collection of evidence would have been completely stalled. The ED has further submitted that it is empowered to enquire the same, since the Rupee denominated bonds overseas (Masala Bonds) are subject to compliance of guidelines under External Commercial Borrowings (ECB), and that transactions on account of ECB and Trade Credit are governed by Section 6 (3)(d) of FEMA. In fact, the issuance of summons is also envisaged as being mandatory for collection of evidence as part of any evidence under FEMA. The ED has further refuted the submissions made by the petitioner that they had complied with the provisions of KIIFB Act as being immaterial, and contended that such contentions ought to have been made before the investigation agency, if required. Additionally, the ED has also refuted the allegations of the petitioners stating that...

Investigation Against KIIFB At Preliminary Stage; Issuance Of Summons Do Not Violate Right: ED Tells Kerala High Court

Navya Benny

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Navya Benny

Investigation Against KIIFB At Preliminary Stage; Issuance Of Summons Do Not Violate Right: ED Tells Kerala High Court

Navya Benny

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Navya Benny

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers