Order 26 Rule 9 CPC | Karnataka HC Issues Guidelines For Appointment Of Local Commissioners, Timely Filing Of Inspection Reports

The Karnataka High Court has issued broad guidelines for trial courts to follow in appointing Court Commissioners exercising power under Order XXVI Rules 9 and 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure and also to adhere to a timeline in receiving reports of the Commissioner.A single judge bench of Justice Anant Ramanath Hegde sitting at Kalaburagi, said “The report under Order XXVI of the Code, in an appropriate case, is an effective tool available to the court and the party to the proceeding. The party to the proceeding, may use this tool for proving his/her case and the court to unravel the mystery surrounding the case.” The court broadly outlined the cases in which the provision can be effectively applied such as (i) The dispute relating to the easement of air, light, pathway, road, watercourse, etc. (ii) The dispute relating to the boundary, encroachment. (iii) The dispute relating to forgery. (iv) The dispute relating to the existence or otherwise of a stream, pond, drainage, watercourse, road, pathway, pollution, or nuisance.However, it clarified that these examples are not exhaustive but merely illustrative. "The guidelines in this order should not be construed as having exhaustively listed the cases in which the Commissioner can be appointed. Nor the observations should be construed as having diluted or expanded the discretion vested with the trial court in such matters.” Court said it cannot lose sight of the fact that in a large number of suits before the Trial Court, the applications are filed for the appointment of a Commissioner. In other words, this is one of the frequently invoked provisions of the Code.The bench then proceeded to issue the following guidelines.a) The power of the court to appoint the Commissioner for local inspection or any other purpose provided in Order XXVI of the Code is discretionary. However, the said discretion is guided by not only Order XXVI Rules 9 and 10 of the Code but also the provisions of the Indian Evidence Act dealing with relevancy, expert opinion, and the burden of proof. b) The discretion to exercise the power under Order XXVI of the Code of Civil Procedure is not governed by the form of the suit. The Court can appoint the Commissioner in any kind of suit, provided a report of the Commissioner under Order XXVI of the Code is necessary for elucidating the matter in dispute. c) The issue framed in the suit, or where the issue is not yet framed, the pleadings which give rise to issue/s and the documents placed on record would be a guide to ascertain the ‘matter in dispute’ referred in Order XXVI Rule 9 of the Code d) The power to appoint Commissioner for local inspection or scientific investigation/expert’s opinion can be invoked even suo motu by the court, without there being an application by either of the parties, if the Court deems it appropriate to secure the report of the Commissioner. However, appropriate reasons must precede the order appointing the Commissioner and such orders are to be passed only after hearing the parties before it. e) The Commissioner can be appointed either before or after the commencement of the trial. However, having due regard to the nature of the controversy, if the report is essential for elucidating the matter in dispute, it is desirable to have the local inspection before the commencement of trial as it is likely to reduce the volume of oral evidence in a given case. f) In addition to the report, having regard to Order XXVI Rule 10 of the Code, the evidence taken by Commissioner reduced in writing can also be taken on record and examined by the court while considering the report. g) The report of the Commissioner is not conclusive proof of what is stated therein. The report is only a piece of evidence that the Court has to examine based on the other materials on record. h) Report of the Commissioner need not be formally marked for being considered as evidence. Once submitted to the court, the report is part of the court record and can be looked into by the court. i) The court may in its discretion examine the Commissioner on any matter concerning the report. There is no compulsion to examine the Commissioner. However, if the objection is filed to the report, and the party filing the objection seeks to examine the Commissioner then the Commissioner should be examined. In either case, once the Commissioner is examined, the court having due regard to the evidence, may reject or accept the report in its entirety or in part, provided there are materials to justify such a finding on the report. In appropriate cases, the merit of the report can be considered at the final hearing. While considering the report at the final hearing, if the court finds that the report is erroneous and fresh commission is required, the court may pass appropriate order in this regard. j) If the court is dissatisfied with the ‘proceedings of the Commissioner’ as found in Order XXVI Rule 10 (3), it may direct further inquiry depending on the facts. As a matter ...

Order 26 Rule 9 CPC | Karnataka HC Issues Guidelines For Appointment Of Local Commissioners, Timely Filing Of Inspection Reports

Mustafa Plumber

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Mustafa Plumber

Order 26 Rule 9 CPC | Karnataka HC Issues Guidelines For Appointment Of Local Commissioners, Timely Filing Of Inspection Reports

Mustafa Plumber

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Mustafa Plumber

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers