Karnataka High Court Monthly Digest: May 2022 [Citations No: 145-179]

Nominal Index: MOHAMED ARIF JAMEEL v. STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS, 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 145 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO., LTD., v. NAGENDRA, 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 146 Stanley Joseph v. State, 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 147 Sathish N v. Ambika J, 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 148 Chennaiah @Doddachennaiah and others v. Bylappa and others Case, 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 149 B S PRAKASH v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS., and connected matters, 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 150 Babu A Dhammanagi vs Union Of India, 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 151 Xiaomi Technology India Private Limited v. Union of India, 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 152 The Management Of Ksrtc v. K.Shivaram, 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 153 Banu Begum W/O Khajasab Alias Mehaboobsab and Others v. State of Karnataka, 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 154 Savithri v. State of Karnataka, 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 155 Pooja S v. Abhishek Shetty, 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 156 Praveen Kumar Adyapady and Anr. v. State of Karnataka, 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 157 Indian Council For Cultural Relations & Others v. Ajay Merchant & Anr, 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 158 Rashmi Tandon & Anr v. The State Of Karnataka, 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 159 Ashwini v. State of Karnataka, 2022 Livelaw (Kar) 160 Prashanth Sambargi v. The State of Karnataka And Anr, 2022 Livelaw (Kar) 161 Injamam Shariff v. State of Karnataka, 2022 Livelaw (Kar) 162 Good Shepherd Convent v. State of Karnataka And Others, 2022 Livelaw (Kar) 163 Chief Executive Officer and Anr v. K.V.Puttaraju, 2022 Livelaw (Kar) 164 Sushil Goel And Anr v. State At The Instance Of Drug Inspector, 2022 Livelaw (Kar) 165 M/s. Manipal Technologies Ltd. Versus State of Karnataka, 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 166 SHIVAPRASAD @ SHIVA v. State of Karnataka, 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 167 N.R. Sugandaraju v. State of Karnataka, 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 168 NETHRA v STATE OF KARNATAKA, 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 169 V Srinivasaraju v State by Yelahanka Police, 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 170 E S Praveen Kumar v. State of Karnataka, 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 171 Shalini and Anr. versus National Highways Authority of India and Ors. Citation : 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 172 CANCER PATIENTS AID ASSOCIATION v CENTRAL BOARD OF FILM CERTIFICATION, 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 173 SUJIT S/O MADIWALAPPA MULGUND v. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 174 Sangeeta Gadagin v. State Of Karnataka, & C/W Matters, 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 175 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 176 Prakash Sharma S/O Mehdi Sharma v. State By Marathahalli , 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 177 SATHISH K and others v State of Karnataka, 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 178 The Bangalore Development Authority and Others v. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department and others, 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 179 Judgments/Orders/Reports 1. Karnataka High Court Dismisses Challenge To Law Validating Recruitment Of 362 KPSC Gazetted Probationers Of 2011 Batch Case Title: MOHAMED ARIF JAMEEL v. STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS Case No: WRIT PETITION NO.6795 OF 2022 (S-RES-PIL) Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 145 The Karnataka High Court recently dismissed a petition filed seeking to declare the Karnataka Civil Services (Validation of Selection and Appointment of 2011 Batch Gazetted Probationers) Act 2022 as unconstitutional, illegal and void. Through the said Act, the government has validated the recruitment of 362 gazetted 'probationers' of the 2011 batch, selected by the Karnataka Public Service Commission. 2. Incapacity To Work Has To Be Determined With Reference To Sole Occupation Of Person As On Date Of Motor Accident: Karnataka High Court Case Title: UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO., LTD., versus NAGENDRA Case No: MFA NO.8801 OF 2018, Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 146 The Karnataka High Court has said that a person who is a driver by profession if loses complete vision of one eye in a motor accident, then he would not be able to continue his profession of driving, thus it would have to be considered as permanent physical disability and 100% loss of earning capacity. 3. Going Back On Promise To Marry Not Cheating But Failure To Repay Loan Will Attract S.420 IPC: Karnataka High Court On Film Director's Plea Case Title: Stanley Joseph v. State Case No: Criminal Petition no 1172/2018 Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 147 In a cheating case instituted by a woman against film director Stanley Joseph, the Karnataka High Court has said that though going back on a promise to marry will not amount to cheating in this case, but obtaining a loan and not repaying the same will amount to criminal intention to cheating, attracting Section 420 of IPC. 4. Wife Leaving Matrimonial House Not Ground To Deny Maintenance If She Moved Out Due To Ill-Treatment By Husband: Karnataka High Court Case Title: Sathish N v. Ambika J Case No: CRIMINAL PETITION No. 474 OF 2022 Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 148 The Karnataka High Court recently observed that if a wife moves out of the matrimonial house due to ill-treatment...

Karnataka High Court Monthly Digest: May 2022 [Citations No: 145-179]

Mustafa Plumber

Tags