Karnataka High Court Weekly Round Up: July 25 To July 31 ,2022

Nominal Index: B M MUNIRAJU v. THE JAIL SUPERINTENDENT. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 283 Ramesh Naik.L v. State of Karnataka. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 284 CHERANDA NAND SUBBAIAH v. THE UNION OF INDIA & Others. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 285 Gopal v. State of Karnataka. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 286 M/S Bestpay Solutions Private Limited versus M/S Razorpay Software Private Limited. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 287 K.R.KUMAR NAIK v. THE STATE BY ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 288 THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS SECR SOCIAL WELFARE DEPT And BASAVARAJ. YARADEMMI & ANR. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 289 K Durga Prasad Shetty v. Dr Shashikala and Others. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 290 M/s Geosmin Studio Sustainable Solutions LLP versus M/s Ethnus Consultancy Services Pvt. Ltd. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 291 M/S. Flipkart Internet Private Limited versus Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax (International Taxation) and Ors. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 292 BANK OF INDIA v THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 293 Dyavappa v Bangalore University & Others. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 294 Dr Narasimulu Nandini Memorial Education Trust v. Banu Begum & Others. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 295 Judgments/Orders/Reports 1. Person Convicted For Minor Offences Under NI Act Entitled To "Lenient" Consideration Of Parole Application: Karnataka High Court Case Title: B M MUNIRAJU v. THE JAIL SUPERINTENDENT Case No: WRIT PETITION NO.7387/2022 Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 283 The Karnataka High Court has directed the Jail Superintendent of the Central Prison at Bengaluru to consider a parole application filed by an accused convicted under the Negotiable Instruments Act seeking to arrange 50% of the disputed amount for depositing with the Supreme Court Registry in connection with an appeal against conviction pending before it. 2. Karnataka High Court Dismisses Plea Seeking Protection For Justice HP Sandesh Who Spoke Of "Transfer Threat" Case Title: Ramesh Naik.L v. State of Karnataka Case No: WP 14266/2022 Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 284 The Karnataka High Court on Monday dismissed a public interest litigation seeking protection for Justice HP Sandesh, who recently made sensational revelations regarding "transfer threats" for slamming investigations carried out by the Anti-Corruption Bureau in a case allegedly involving Deputy Commissioner, Bengaluru (Urban). 3. Karnataka Govt Has Not Given Permission For Radio-Collaring Of Tigers: High Court Closes PIL Case Title: CHERANDA NAND SUBBAIAH v. THE UNION OF INDIA & Others Case No: WP 34294/2009 Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 285 The Karnataka High Court on Monday disposed of a petition filed in the year 2009 questioning the action of radio collaring of tigers in the Nagarhole National Park. 4. Courts Should Not Seek To Run Governments In The Guise Of Judicial Review: Karnataka High Court Title: Gopal v. State of Karnataka Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 286 "It is primarily the task of the Government to govern and in the guise of judicial review, Courts should not seek to run the governments," the Karnataka High Court has observed. A division bench comprising of Justice Krishna S Dixit and Justice P Krishna Bhat added that when a measure taken by the Government is for implementing a Mega Infrastructural Project pursuant to a policy framed embedded with the opinion of experts, Court should refrain from acting like a "super-accountant and interference with the same should be extremely rare where it is inevitable." 5. Arbitration Clause Can BeInvoked Against Disputes Under Another Agreement, If Both Agreements Form One Composite Transaction: Karnataka High Court Case Title: M/S Bestpay Solutions Private Limited versus M/S Razorpay Software Private Limited Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 287 The Karnataka High Court has ruled that a party can invoke the Arbitration Clause contained in an agreement with respect to the disputes arising with a third party under another agreement, if both the agreements refer to each other and form one composite transaction. 6. ACB Blissfully Ignored'ABC' Of Procedure: Karnataka High Court Quashes Corruption FIR Case Title: K.R.KUMAR NAIK v. THE STATE BY ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU Case No: WRIT PETITION NO. 7911 OF 2022 Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 288 The Karnataka High Court has held that in a case where a public servant is charged with offences punishable under Section 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act on allegation of amassing wealth disproportionate to the known sources of income, every ingredient that is required to be assessed in the source report must be present. 7. Doctrine Of Laches | InWelfare State, Govt As A Litigant Is Subject To Same Norms As A Commoner:Karnataka High Court Case Title: THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP...

Karnataka High Court Weekly Round Up: July 25 To July 31 ,2022

Mustafa Plumber

Tags