Karnataka High Court Weekly Round-Up: May 30 To June 5, 2022

Nominal Index: Sangeeta Gadagin v. State Of Karnataka, & C/W Matters, 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 175 Vikram Vincent v. State of Karnataka, 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 176 Prakash Sharma S/O Mehdi Sharma v. State By Marathahalli Police Station, 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 177 SATHISH K and others v State of Karnataka, 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 178 The Bangalore Development Authority and Others v. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department and others, 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 179 G.H.Abdul Kadri v. Mohammed Iqbal, 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 180 B.A.HARISH GOWDA v. RAVI KUMAR, 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 181 SRIKANTAIAH v STATE BY ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU and ANR, 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 182 ITI Limited versus Alphion Corporation & Anr, 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 183 DR. K.RAVINDRANATH SHETTY & others v STATE OF KARNATAKA & others, 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 184 BOPPANDA N. KUSHALAPPA v. BALEYADA K. CHERAMANNA and Others, 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 185 Dr Yasin Khan v. State of Karnataka and Others, 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 186 BHIMAPPA JANTAKAL @ BHIMANNA & others v State of Karnataka and ANR, 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 187 SRINIVASA and ANR v STATE BY BEECHANALLI POLICE STATION, 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 188 The Vice Chairman Settlement Commission & Anr. versus M/s Zyeta Interiors Pvt. Ltd & Anr, 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 189 Judgments/ Orders/Reports 1. Right To Nutritious Food Under Article 21: Karnataka High Court Directs State Govt To Forthwith Implement ICDS Scheme Case Title: Sangeeta Gadagin v. State Of Karnataka, & C/W Matters Case No: WP 3522/2022 Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 175 The Karnataka High Court has directed the State Government to forthwith take necessary steps to implement the Integrated Child Development Services Scheme (ICDS Scheme) in the state. Otherwise, the Court observed that the fundamental right to nutritious food of 50 lakhs beneficiaries in Karnataka, particularly of pregnant women, lactating mothers and children, stand violated. 2. Karnataka HC Directs Police To Investigate Allegations Of Unnatural Sex Leveled Against IIT'ian Husband By Wife Also Pursuing Doctorate At IIT Case Title: Vikram Vincent v. State of KarnatakaCitation: 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 176 The Karnataka High Court has directed the police to investigate alleged charges of performing unnatural sex, levelled against a husband by his estranged wife. 3. 'No Specific Allegation': Karnataka High Court Grants Bail To Receptionist Of Hotel Being Used As Brothel Case Title: Prakash Sharma S/O Mehdi Sharma v. State By Marathahalli Police Station Case No: CRIMINAL PETITION NO.4281 OF 2022 Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 177 The Karnataka High Court has granted bail to an accused who was working as a receptionist at a hotel which was allegedly being used as a brothel. 4. Criminal Proceedings For Offence Of Rape Can Be Closed On Account Of Settlement Between Parties: Karnataka High Court Case Title: SATHISH K and others v State of Karnataka Case No: CRIMINAL PETITION No.4172 OF 2022 Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 178 The Karnataka High Court recently held that closure of proceedings on account of settlement arrived at between the parties even for offence of Rape, punishable under Section 376 of the IPC, is permissible. Observing thus, it quashed the proceedings pending against four persons on the complaint made by a woman belonging to the same family. 5. Res Judicata: Son Bound By Judicial Proceedings Initiated By Father With Respect To Immovable Property, Rules Karnataka High Court Case Title: The Bangalore Development Authority and Others v. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department and others Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 179 The Karnataka High Court has said that proceedings initiated by a father in respect of a claim of title over a property which is decided by the court will bind the son also. He cannot be permitted to agitate for the same cause, following the principle of res-judicata. 6. Criminal Trial Can't Proceed Ex-Parte, Evidence Can't Be Received In Absence Of Accused Except U/S 299 CrPC: Karnataka High Court Case Title: G.H.Abdul Kadri v. Mohammed Iqbal Case No: Crl.RP.No.1323/2019 Citation; 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 180 The Karnataka High Court has said that a criminal trial cannot be held in the absence of an accused unless personal appearance is dispensed with for valid reasons. There cannot be dispensation of examination of an accused under section 313 Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C) if incriminating evidence appears in the evidence of the witness. 7. Karnataka High Court Suggests Centre To Amend S.372 CrPC To Allow Victims To File Appeal Seeking Enhancement Of Sentence Of Convicts Case Title: B.A.HARISH GOWDA v. RAVI KUMAR Case No: CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.175/2021 Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 181 The Karnataka High Court has suggested that the Central Government make necessary amendments to Section 372 of the Criminal Procedure Code, in order to provide...

Karnataka High Court Weekly Round-Up: May 30 To June 5, 2022

Mustafa Plumber

Tags