Kerala Court Rejects Former MLA Antony Raju's Plea To Quash Conviction In Evidence Tampering Case

The District and Sessions Court, Thiruvananthapuram on Tuesday (17 February) rejected the application filed by former MLA Antony Raju to quash his conviction in the Evidence Tampering case.Smt. Nazeera S Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thiruvananthapuram, dismissed the plea moved in his appeal against conviction. As a consequence, Raju will not be able to contest the upcoming assembly elections in the State.Earlier, this month the Sessions Court suspended his sentence. Judicial First Class Magistrate -I Nedumangad, convicted Antony Raju, who is arrayed as the second accused in an evidence tampering case, when he was a junior lawyer in a narcotic drugs case involving an Australian national, Andrew Salvatore.The present appeal is filed, challenging the verdict which had sentenced him to three years of simple imprisonment and imposed a fine of ₹10,000. The verdict had subsequently led to his disqualification as an MLA.The facts that led to evidence tampering, according to the prosecution, are as follows. Salvatore, who is an Australian citizen was caught with narcotics hidden in a pocket of his underwear during frisking at the Thiruvananthapuram Airport while on his way to Mumbai in April 1990. The personal belongings including the underwear and other articles seized by the police from Salvatore which were kept in the safe custody of the court of the Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvananthapuram was later released to Antony Raju, who was the junior counsel by the court clerk.The underwear allegedly returned by Antony Raju did not fit Salvatore. This had led the High Court to acquit Salvatore in February 1991. However, the High Court had expressed suspicion about planting the evidence. A vigilance enquiry led to the registration of an FIR against the court clerk and Antony Raju in 1994 accusing them of having conspired together with the intention and preparation to cause the disappearance of evidence.In 2023, Kerala High Court quashed the criminal proceedings on the grounds that it was hit by the bar under Section 195(1)(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and had directed a de novo (fresh) investigation to be initiated following the correct procedure.In 2024, the Supreme Court restored criminal proceedings which was earlier quashed by the Kerala High Court.In 2026, the Judicial First Class Magistrate - I, Nedumangad, found Antony Raju guilty of offences under Section 120 B(Punishment for Criminal Conspiracy), 201(Causing Disappearance of Evidence of Offence, or giving False Information to screen offender), 193(Punishment for False Evidence), and 465(Punishment for Forgery) read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.Case Title: Antony Raju v The State of KeralaCase No: Crl. MP 2/ 2026 in Crl.A/10/2026

Kerala Court Rejects Former MLA Antony Raju's Plea To Quash Conviction In Evidence Tampering Case

Anamika MJ

Tags