Madhya Pradesh High Court Weekly Roundup: March 7 To March 13, 2022

NOMINAL INDEXMohd. Adil Vs. State Of Madhya Pradesh; 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 62 Himanshu @ Mintu Day V. The State Of Madhya Pradesh; 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 63 Dileep Kumar Yadav S/O Mohan Yadav V. The State Of Madhya Pradesh And Ors.; 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 64 Vidhi ka Ulaghan Karne Wala Balak Versus State of M.P. & Anr.; 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 65 Kalla @ Vidyaram Vs. State of M.P.; 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 66 Pramod Kumar v. State of Madhya Pradesh; 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 67 Adam Khan v. State of MP& Ors.; 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 68 Raghunandan Dhakad Vs. The State of M.P.; 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 69 Ramdayal Charmkarr v State of Madhya Pradesh; 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 70 Siddhi Gupta v State of Madhya Pradesh; 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 71 Krishnapal Singh Kansana Vs. State of MP and Anr.; 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 72 Pawan Kumar Jain V State Of Madhya Pradesh; 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 73 People's College of Medical Sciences and Research Center and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.' 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 74Jahar Singh Gurjar Vs. The State of M.P. & Another; 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 75 Deepali Jadhav V. The State Of Madhya Pradesh And Anr.; 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 76'Sufficient Material Shown To Convict Appellant': Madhya Pradesh High Court Denies Bail To Man Convicted For Offences Under UAPA And Explosives Act Case Title: MOHD. ADIL Vs. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHCitation: 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 62The High Court of Madhya Pradesh recently denied bail to the Appellant convicted for offences punishable under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 and the Explosive Substances Act, 1908, observing that the contentions put forth by the Appellant would have to be considered at the later stage of final hearing.The division bench of Chief Justice Ravi Malimath and Justice Dinesh Kumar Paliwal was dealing with an application U/S 389 CRPC for suspension of sentence and grant of bail, filed by the Appellant convicted by the trial court U/S 16(B), 18 UAPA, and U/S 6 Explosive Substances Act.'Inefficient, Ignorant Of Basic Common Sense': Madhya Pradesh High Court Orders Inquiry Against Police Officer For Investigating In Wrong Direction Case Title: HIMANSHU @ MINTU DAY v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHCitation: 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 63The Madhya Pradesh High Court recently directed the Director General Of Police to seek explanation from an Investigating Officer, for 'wasting his time and resources in a wrong direction', while investigating a case.Justice Vivek Agarwal was dealing with a bail application moved by the Applicant accused for offences punishable under Section 363, 366A, 376(2)(n) IPC and also under Section 5, 6 of POCSO Act.Madhya Pradesh High Court Laments At Bureaucrats Passing Orders Being Oblivious To Principles Of Natural Justice, Manifesting Heedlessness Case Title: DILEEP KUMAR YADAV S/O MOHAN YADAV v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ORS.Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 64The High Court of Madhya Pradesh recently set aside an order passed by the Collector, terminating the contractual services of a Gram Rojgar Sahayak, by observing that the said order was passed without following the principles of natural justice.Justice Sanjay Dwivedi was essentially dealing with a writ petition, wherein the Petitioner was challenging the order passed by the Collector, District Betul, whereby his contractual service as Gram Rojgar Sahayak was terminated for his alleged actions of misappropriating government money.'Child In Conflict With Law Can't Be Treated As Under Trial Prisoner U/S 436-A CrPC': Madhya Pradesh High Court Case Title: Vidhi ka Ulaghan Karne Wala Balak Versus State of M.P. & Anr.Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 65The Madhya Pradesh High Court, Gwalior Bench recently held that a Child in Conflict with Law (CCL) cannot be treated as an undertrial prisoner as contemplated under Section 436-A CrPC, since arrest/ confinement/ apprehension are not contemplated in Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015.Justice Anand Pathak was essentially dealing with a criminal revision preferred by a CCL, challenging the order passed by the lower court, whereby his appeal was dismissed and the order passed by the Juvenile Justice Board was affirmed.'Important To Rejuvenate Ideas Of Love & Mercy': Madhya Pradesh High Court Directs Murder Accused To Plant Saplings As Condition For Bail Case Title: Kalla @ Vidyaram Vs. State of M.P.Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 66The Madhya Pradesh High Court, Gwalior Bench recently directed a Bail Applicant to plant five saplings of any 'fruit bearing tree' or 'Neem/Pipal tree', as one of the conditions for granting him bail.Justice Anand Pathak however made it clear that the bail plea was allowed based on the merits of the case and not in exchange for any social service. "Bail is granted once the case is made out for bail and thereafter, direction for plantation of saplings is given and it is not the case where a person intends to serve social cause can be given...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Weekly Roundup: March 7 To March 13, 2022

Shrutika Pandey

Tags