Top
News Updates

Nirbhaya Case: Convict Mukesh Moves Delhi HC Seeking Stay On Death Warrant Until The Mercy Plea Is Decided

Karan Tripathi
14 Jan 2020 4:48 PM GMT
Nirbhaya Case: Convict Mukesh Moves Delhi HC Seeking Stay On Death Warrant Until The Mercy Plea Is Decided
x
Your free access to Live Law has expired
To read the article, get a premium account.
    Your Subscription Supports Independent Journalism
Subscription starts from
599+GST
(For 6 Months)
Premium account gives you:
  • Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.
  • Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.
Already a subscriber?

One of the four convicts of Nirbhaya rape case, Mukesh, has moved the Delhi High Court challenging the death order issued by the Sessions Judge Satish Arora on December 7.

As per the death warrant, the four convicts are scheduled to be hanged on January 22, 7 am.

Filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, the petition challenges the issuance of death warrant on the ground that the convicts are still left with the remedy of seeking mercy from the President of India.

It states that as per the law laid down by the apex court in Shatrughan Chauhan v. Union of India, the death row convicts must be given a notice of minimum 14 days after their mercy plea is rejected by the President.

Therefore, the petition seeks directions to be issued to Union Government, Delhi Government, Inspector General of Prisons, and Jail Superintendent (Tihar), ensure that at least fourteen days notice is given to the Petitioner and his family about the scheduled date of execution if the Petitioner's mercy petition is rejected by the Hon'ble President of India.

He also submitted that through this petition he is not questioning the final verdict of the Hon'ble Supreme Court or the fitness of the imposition of the death penalty, or any action / inaction by the Hon'ble President of India.

Further, it is argued that as per the Supreme Court's judgment in Shabnam v. Union of India, seeking mercy from the President is the constitutional right of a death row convict.

It is also highlighted that secret executions that took place prior to the Supreme Court's guidelines in Shatrughan Chauhan, namely in the cases of Ajmal Kasab (21st November 2012) and Afzal Guru (9th February 2013) is no longer possible in view of the jurisprudence and guidelines laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Shatrughan Chauhan.

He, therefore, claims that his right to seek mercy will be rendered infructuous if the order issuing the death warrant is not stayed.

Today, the Supreme Court has rejected the curative petitions filed by two of the convicts, Mukesh and Vinay

Next Story
Share it