Punjab & Haryana High Court Monthly Digest: May 2022 [Citations 90-124]

Nominal Index Vipul v. State of Punjab2022 LiveLaw (PH) 90 Kulwinder Singh v. State of Punjab 2022 LiveLaw (PH) 91 Tata AIG General Insurance Company Limited Vs. Surjeet Kaur and others, with connected matters 2022 LiveLaw (PH) 92 M/s Experion Developers Private Limited vs. State of Haryana and others 2022 LiveLaw (PH) 93 Lovedeep Singh v. Gurpreet Kaur [CRR(F)-314-2022] 2022 LiveLaw (PH) 94 Amir Kapoor Versus Nisha & another 2022 LiveLaw (PH) 95 Simranjit Kaur @ Simarn Kaur Versus Bhinder Pal Singh 2022 LiveLaw (PH) 96 Sunita Devi Versus Amrit Lal 2022 LiveLaw (PH) 97 Resuna & Anr. v. State of Haryana and others 2022 LiveLaw (PH) 98 Jatinder Singh v. Union of India and others [Civil Writ Petition No.35638 of 2019] 2022 LiveLaw (PH) 99 Sunita and Another v. State of Haryana and Others 2022 LiveLaw (PH) 100 Manpreet Singh vs State of Punjab and others 2022 LiveLaw (PH) 101 Ajay Vs. State of Haryana 2022 LiveLaw (PH) 102 Manish Singh @ Golu v. State of UT Chandigarh 2022 LiveLaw (PH) 103 Raj Bala v. State of Haryana and Others 2022 LiveLaw (PH) 104 Mamta Versus State of Haryana, and connected matter 2022 LiveLaw (PH) 105Rani versus Additional District Magistrate And Anr 2022 LiveLaw (PH) 106 Harbans Kaur v. Joginder Pal [FAO-M-272 of 2017] 2022 LiveLaw (PH) 107 Gurpreet Singh Versus State of Punjab 2022 LiveLaw (PH) 108 Seema Rani Versus Anurag Verma and others 2022 LiveLaw (PH) 109 Surjit Singh Dhaliwal Versus State of Punjab and another 2022 LiveLaw (PH) 110 Paro and others v. Mahindo 2022 LiveLaw (PH) 111 Simarjit Kaur @ Simerjeet Kaur @ Simarjeet Kaur versus Maninder Kaur 2022 LiveLaw (PH) 112 Rakesh Khanna @ Babbu v. Gulzari Lal and Others 2022 LiveLaw (PH) 113 Ankush Rawat v. Guru Nanak Education Trust and Another 2022 LiveLaw (PH) 114Novex Communications Private Limited v. Union of India and another 2022 LiveLaw (PH) 115 Amit v. State of Haryana and Others 2022 LiveLaw (PH) 116 Mahavir Singh v. Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited and others 2022 LiveLaw (PH) 117Vasu Syal v. State of Punjab 2022 LiveLaw (PH) 118 Parveen Mehta Versus Vishal Joshi 2022 LiveLaw (PH) 119 Rinku Singh Versus Union of India 2022 LiveLaw (PH) 120 Munshi Ram versus Vidya Devi and Another 2022 LiveLaw (PH) 121 Sharma Constructions Joint Venture Versus Punjab Agro Industries Corporation Ltd. and another 2022 LiveLaw (PH) 122 Gurmahabir Singh v. State of Punjab 2022 LiveLaw (PH) 123 Paramjeet @ Kala and Other v. State of Haryana 2022 LiveLaw (PH) 124 Judgments/ Orders of the Week Mere Involvement In Other Cases Can't Be Sole Basis To Confine Accused In Perpetuity, Case To Be Considered On Its Own Merits: Punjab & Haryana HC Case Title: Vipul v. State of Punjab Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (PH) 90 Punjab and Haryana High Court while dealing with a petition for seeking concession of regular bail in FIR registered under provisions of IPC and the Arms Act, held that taking into consideration, the role of the petitioner, the alleged recovery and the stage of investigation along with the period of actual custodial detention already undergone, it is appropriate to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The bench comprising Justice Vinod S. Bhardwaj held that the mere involvement of the petitioner in other cases cannot be the sole basis to keep him confined in perpetuity. Even though the antecedents of an accused may be one amongst the relevant considerations while adjudicating a petition on merits for grant of bail, however, a mere involvement of the petitioner in other cases cannot be the sole basis to keep him confined in perpetuity. POCSO Act | Chargesheet Filed Without FSL Report Not Incomplete, No Ground For Default Bail U/S 167(2) CrPC: Punjab & Haryana High Court Case Title: Kulwinder Singh v. State of Punjab Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (PH) 91 The Punjab and Haryana High Court, while dealing with a case registered under provisions of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO), held that, for an offense of sexual assault, final report would be complete on statement of the prosecutrix and FSL report can be used only to corroborate their version. The bench comprising Justice Suvir Sehgal held that based on the challan filed by the Investigating Agency, the Court can take cognizance of the offense. Liability Of Insurer Invited Due To "Involvement" Of Vehicle In Accident, Not Negligence Of Driver Per Se: Punjab & Haryana High Court Case Title: Tata AIG General Insurance Company Limited Vs. Surjeet Kaur and others, with connected matters Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (PH) 92 The Punjab and Haryana High Court recently while dealing with a matter related to compensation in a motor accident act claim observed that negligence of the driver is not, per se, the reason...

Punjab & Haryana High Court Monthly Digest: May 2022 [Citations 90-124]

Drishti Yadav

Tags