Round Ups
![Courts This Week- A Weekly Round Of Important Legal Developments In The Country [Episode-23]](https://www.livelaw.in/h-upload/videothumb/yt_UwJUsu-18PM.jpg "Courts This Week- A Weekly Round Of Important Legal Developments In The Country [Episode-23]")
High Courts Weekly Roundup
Week Commencing July 13, 2020 To July 19, 2020 Allahabad High Court 1) Mumbai Man Accused Of Threatening To 'Blow Up' UP CM Yogi Adityanath Moves Allahabad HC For Regular Bail [Kamran Ameen Khan v. State of UP] The single bench of Justice Alok Mathur asked the Additional Advocate General to seek instructions from the State on the bail application of a Mumbai resident who...
![Courts This Week- A Weekly Round Of Important Legal Developments In The Country [Episode-22]](https://www.livelaw.in/h-upload/videothumb/yt_v0L6BhsTJGs.jpg "Courts This Week- A Weekly Round Of Important Legal Developments In The Country [Episode-22]")
High Courts Weekly Roundup
Week Commencing From July 6, 2020 To July 12, 2020 Allahabad High Court 1) UP Police Continues To Register FIR Under 'Unconstitutional' Section 66A IT Act ; Allahabad HC Refuses To Quash It [Rohit Singhal v. State Of UP & Ors.] Despite striking off of Section 66A of the Information Technology Act by the Supreme Court in the case of Shreya Singhal v. Union of India, a...
High Courts Weekly Roundup
Week Commencing From June 30, 2020 To July 5, 2020 Allahabad High Court 1) 'Even If Will Not Enforceable For Being Void, It Is Not Non-Est & Is Admissible Under Evidence Act S. 32(5) To Decide Pedigree': Allahabad HC [Bhrigurasan & Ors. v. DDC & Ors.] Expounding the difference between the concepts of 'void' and 'non-est', the bench of Justice Salil Kumar Rai held, "Even...
![Courts This Week- A Weekly Round Of Important Legal Developments In The Country [Episode-21]](https://www.livelaw.in/h-upload/videothumb/yt_a6_TAdRV1vE.jpg "Courts This Week- A Weekly Round Of Important Legal Developments In The Country [Episode-21]")
Supreme Court Monthly Digest: April 2020
1. [TADA] Confession Of Co-accused Inadmissible Against Another Accused If They Were Tried Separately: SC While interpreting the scope of Section 15 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987, a Supreme Court bench comprising Justice S. Abdul Nazeer and Justice Deepak Gupta held that if for any reason, a joint trial is not held, the confession of a co-accused...
![Courts This Week- A Weekly Round Of Important Legal Developments In The Country [Episode-20]](https://www.livelaw.in/h-upload/videothumb/yt_JOmkt1y7uP0.jpg "Courts This Week- A Weekly Round Of Important Legal Developments In The Country [Episode-20]")