All High Courts Weekly Round-Up [April 25 - May 1, 2022]

Allahabad High Court NOMINAL INDEX Umesh Yadav v. State of U.P. 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 203 U.P. Cooperative Federation Ltd v. The Employees State Insurance Corporation 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 204 Amit Kumar Jain v. State Of U.P. And 3 Others 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 205 Namaha v. State of U.P. and others 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 206 Amit Singh v. State Of U.P. And 3 Others 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 207 Sakshi Jaiswal v. State of U.P. and Another 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 208 Kiran Singh v. State Of U.P. And Anr 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 209 Bablu @ Vishnu Dhar Dubey v. State of U.P. and Another 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 210 Lavi Choudhari v. State Of U.P.And 2 Others 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 211M/S Rohit Surfactants Private Limited v. M/S Kanodia Salt Company Ltd.And Another 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 212 Chaman Mangla v. State of U.P. and Another 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 213 Chhotey Lal v. U.O.I. N.C.B. along with a connected matter 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 214 Ram Autar And Others v. State of U.P. 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 215 Saurabh Tiwari v. State Of U.P. And 2 Others 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 216 Rajkumar Yadav v. State Thru C.B.I./ACB Lucknow 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 217 Dr. J.S. Yadav v. Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 218 Jaya Prada Nahata v. Mohd. Azam Khan And 9 Others 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 219 Vipin Tiwari v. State of U.P. and Another and connected matters 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 220 Judgments/Orders of the Week Honesty, Fairness, Purity Of Mind Highest Order To Approach Court: Allahabad HC Imposes 1 Lakh Cost On Litigant Making False Assertion Of Compromise Case Title: Umesh Yadav v. State of U.P. Case citation: 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 203 The High Court observed that the Courts of law are meant for imparting justice between the parties and anyone who approaches the Court must come with clean hands and no material facts should be concealed. A Single-Judge Bench comprising Justice Sanjay Kumar Singh observed thus while dismissing an application filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure ("Cr.P.C.") for quashing the entire criminal proceedings under Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code ("I.P.C.") and Section 6 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Expansive Definition Of 'Manufacturing Process' To Include More Factories Under ESIC Act Shall Apply "Prospectively": Allahabad High Court Case Title- U.P. Cooperative Federation Ltd v. The Employees State Insurance Corporation Case Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 204 The High Court has held that the application of the term 'manufacturing process', which was added to the Employees State Insurance Act ('the Act') by virtue of the Employees State Insurance (Amendment Act), 1989 ('the Amendment Act'), would apply prospectively and would have no application prior to the said amendment coming into force. A Single-judge Bench of Justice Pankaj Bhatia, sitting at Lucknow, observed thus while allowing a writ petition that primarily challenged multiple orders of the Employees State Insurance Corporation that demanded payment from the petitioners towards the employer's contribution in respect of the employees working in the accounts section of the PCF Press run by the petitioner. Judicial Officer's Wife Lodges FIR Against Advocate Who Accused Officer Of Taking Bribe: Allahabad HC Directs SSP To Monitor Probe Case title - Amit Kumar Jain v. State Of U.P. And 3 Others [CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 3894 of 2022] Case citation: 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 205 The High Court ordered the Senior Superintendent of Police, Muzaffar Nagar to personally monitor the investigation in an FIR by the wife of a Judicial Officer against an advocate, who accused the Judicial Officer of taking a bribe to pass favorable orders. The bench of Justice Ashwani Kumar Mishra and Justice Rajnish Kumar however refused to transfer the case to any other investigating agency as the Court opined that the allegations were neither specific nor are substantiated and that, there is no reason to doubt the impartiality of the Investigating Officer in the matter. PIL Seeks Direction To CM Adityanath To Disclose Actual Name, Stop Using 'Yogi' As Title: Allahabad HC Dismisses It With ₹1 Lakh Cost Case title - Namaha v. State of U.P. and others Case Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 206 The High Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) plea filed seeking direction to Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath to disclose his full and actual name in the public domain, with Rs. 1 Lakh Cost. The PIL plea moved by one Namaha also sought a direction to CM Yogi Adityanath to take the oath of office and secrecy under his real name and to refrain from using the word 'Yogi' as a title in his official communication. Non-Reporting Of Seizure Forthwith To Magistrate U/S 102 (3) CrPC Doesn't Make Such Seizure By Police Illegal: Allahabad High Court Case title - Amit Singh v. State Of U.P. And 3 Others [CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11201 of 2021] Case...

All High Courts Weekly Round-Up [April 25 - May 1, 2022]

Shrutika Pandey

Tags