Allahabad High Court Monthly Digest: December 2022 [Citations 511 - 543]

NOMINAL INDEX Dr. Syed Fareed Haider Rizvi @ Dr. S.F.H. Rizvi v. C.B.I. Thru. S.P./A.C.B. Lko 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 511 Manjeet Yadav v. State Of U.P. Thru. C.B.I 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 512 Umesh Kumar Versus State Of U.P. 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 513 Rahul Agarwal v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief./Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home, Lko and connected matters 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 514 Ganesh v. State of UP 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 515 Vakeel Quraishi and 2 Ors.v. State of U.P. 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 516 Hari Singh v. Shyam Bihari And 20 Others 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 517 Dist. Bar Association Amethi, Thru. Its General Secretary v. State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko. And 6 Others 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 518 Pushpendra Chauhan vs. State of UP 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 519 Vijay Gupta v. State Of U.P. Thru.Addl.Chief Secy.Basic Education Lko. And ors along with connected matters 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 520 Dinesh Pratap Singh v. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Govt. Lko. 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 521 Anil vs. State of UP 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 522 X (victim) vs. State Of U.P. And 6 Others 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 523 Bal Kumar Patel Alias Raj Kumar v. State of U.P. and Another 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 524 Rajesh Kumar Sharma v. C.B.I. 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 525 Ansad Badruddin And Another v. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lucknow And 2 Others 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 526 Devendra Pandey and others vs. State Of U.P. Thru. C.B.I. along with connected matters 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 527 Md. Umar Gautam v. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lucknow 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 528 Ramesh Rai @ Matru Rai vs. State of U.P. 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 529 Amit Kumar Tiwari v. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 530 Prashant Chandra Versus Harish Gidwani Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Range 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 531 Satya Prakash Sharma v. State of U.P. 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 532 Badri Shrestha v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and another 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 533 Basoo Yadav vs. Union Of India And 4 Others 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 534 U.P. Expressways Industrial Development Authority versus M/s. Sahakar Global Ltd. 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 535 Kamla Singh vs. State Of U.P. And 3 Others 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 536 Sidhique Kappan vs. Directorate Of Enforcement Thru. Assistant Director Lucknow 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 537 Faisal Ashraf vs. State Of U.P. And 2 Others 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 538 XYZ vs. State of UP and 2 others 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 539 Saleem vs. State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 540 Vaibhav Pandey vs. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Urban along with connected matters 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 541 Krishna Kant vs. State of U.P 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 542 Gulam Rashul vs. State of U.P 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 543 ORDERS/JUDGMENTS [S. 19 PC Act] No Sanction Needed To Prosecute Public Servant If CBI Probed Case Upon Constitutional Court's Order: Allahabad HC Case title - Dr. Syed Fareed Haider Rizvi @ Dr. S.F.H. Rizvi v. C.B.I. Thru. S.P./A.C.B. Lko [APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8292 of 2018] Case Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 511 The Allahabad High Court has held that when a Constitutional Court entrusts an investigation in a case to CBI and the role of a public servant emerges as an accused for committing such an offence, no prior sanction under Section 19 PC Act would be required for prosecuting such a public servant. In other words, the bench of Justice Dinesh Kumar Singh has observed that if the CBI has probed a matter upon a direction of the High Court or Supreme Court, and has filed a charge sheet against a government/public servant, then there is no requirement to obtain sanction under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act from the competent authority for prosecuting such a government/public servant (serving or retired). 2013 DSP Jiya-Ul-Haq Murder Case: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail To Accused Who Spent 9 Years In Jail Case title - Manjeet Yadav v. State Of U.P. Thru. C.B.I [CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5796 of 2021] Case Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 512 The Allahabad High Court granted bail to one Manjeet Yadav, who is an accused in the 2013 Deputy Superintendent Of Police Zia-ul Haq Murder Case in view of his long incarceration of 9 years in jail. Essentially, Manjeet Yadav had moved to the High Court with the instant bail plea on the ground that he has been in jail for more than nine years from the date of his arrest, the prosecution has concluded the evidence of its witnesses and now, the defence witnesses are being examined. Revocation of GST Registration Can't Be Rejected Solely For Delay In Moving Revocation Application: Allahabad High Court Case Title: Umesh Kumar Versus State Of U.P. [Writ Tax No. - 648 of 2021] Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 513 The Allahabad High Court has held that the rejection of registration solely on the ground of delay in moving...

Allahabad High Court Monthly Digest: December 2022 [Citations 511 - 543]

Sparsh Upadhyay

Tags