Madras High Court Monthly Digest - August 2023

Citations: 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 211 To 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 248 NOMINAL INDEX Pascal Sasil R v. State of Tamil Nadu, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 211 M Mohammed Abbas v State, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 212 Erode Mavatta Valamana Thodakka Versus .The Managing Director / Additional Registrar Erode District Central Cooperative Bank, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 213 Aashik Ali v State, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 214 Murugan v State of Tamil Nadu and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 215 P Gnana Pragasam v Pradeep Yadav IAS and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 216 Habeeb Mohamed v. The Home Secretary and Others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 217 Thangamani v The Collector, Erode District, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 218 Muthupalanichamy and another v Gnana Pragasam and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 219 P Elangovan and others v R Prema Latha and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 220 Senthilkumar D v Government of Tamil Nadu and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 221 Matrimony.Com Ltd v Alphabet Inc and others (and connected cases), 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 222 K Indulekha v. The Chairman, TNPSC and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 223 A Anand v. The Superintendent of Police and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 224 Arunkanth v Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 225 A Lakshminarayanan v The Assistant General Manager, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 226 Jothi v The State and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 227 Manoj Immanuel v Union of India and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 228 Lois Sophia @ Layis Shobia v. Inspector of Police and Others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 229 Dr. Gurubaran and others v. Union of India and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 230 Kajendran v Superintendent of Police and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 231 P Vigneshwaran @ Viduthalai Sigappi v State, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 232 Abdul Rahman v The Passport Officer, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 233 Er.A.Kanagasabapathy vs. Government of Tamil Nadu and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 234 B. Saravanan vs. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Tirunelveli Region, Tirunelveli and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 235 Ramki vs. State [Crl.A.No.72 of 2022], 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 236 Gnanasekaran Thiyagaraj v State, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 237 S Jarin Singh v Union Of India, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 238 Athipathi v. The Principal Secretary and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 239 The President v The District Collector, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 240 Vellingiri Hill Tribal Protection Society v Union of India and Others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 241 PhonePe Private Limited v Digipe Fintech Private Limited, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 242 ML Ravi v Chairman and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 243 O Paneerselvam v All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 244 Prasanna Chakravarthy v State, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 245 V Perumal v Tamil Nadu State Level Scrutiny Committee and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 246 H Raja v State, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 247 N Mahendran v The Director of Public Health and Preventive Medicine and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 248 REPORTS Lawyers Can Take Action Against Litigant Harassing Them Over Queries Raised By Court: Madras High Court Case Title: Pascal Sasil R v. State of Tamil Nadu Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 211 The Madras High Court on Monday said that if a litigant harasses a lawyer over certain queries raised by the court, the lawyer can initiate action against such party. The division bench of Chief Justice SV Gangapurwala and Justice PD Audikesavalu made the remark while hearing a public interest litigation filed by a final year law student seeking to establish government run old age homes in every district of Tamil Nadu in accordance with Section 19(1) of The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act 2007. When the case was taken up on Monday, the counsel for the petitioner submitted a memo to the bench informing the court that after the previous hearing, the petitioner had been harassing him. The lawyer sought to withdraw from the case. The court, while allowing the counsel to withdraw from the case, said: "The petitioner is also present here and seeks time to engage another lawyer. While we grant him time, this Court feels it necessary to reiterate that any queries posed by us are for the benefit of the litigants and queries do not indicate our order. Also, any advocate, who is harassed by a litigant following the court’s queries, or even otherwise, is entitled to take appropriate action against the litigant". Madras High Court Grants Bail To Lawyer Arrested Under UAPA By NIA For Alleged Links With PFI Case Title: M Mohammed Abbas v State Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 212 The Madras High Court has granted bail to Mohammad Abbas, a Madurai based lawyer who was arrested by the National Investigation Agency under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act for his alleged links with the banned Popular Front of India (PFI) organization. ...

Madras High Court Monthly Digest - August 2023

Upasana Sajeev

Tags