Madras High Court Monthly Digest - September 2022 [Citations 376 to 418]

Citations: 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 376 To 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 418 NOMINAL INDEX V Kannan v State, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 376 Woodlands Theatres v. State of Tamil Nadu, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 377 Dr. P R Subaschandran v. State and others, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 378 E Palaniswamy v. O Paneerselvam, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 379 K. Samad & Anr. versus Reliance Capital Limited, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 380 S. Annapoorni v. K Vijay, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 381 The Assistant Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Versus M/s.Ganges International Private Limited, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 382 M/s. Sunwin Papers versus M/s. Sivadarshini Papers Pvt. Ltd., 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 383 India Yamaha Motor Private Limited Versus The Assistant Commissioner, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 384 M/s.EIH Associated Hotels Ltd. Versus The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 385 B Shanmugam and others v. Karthik Dasari, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 386 Dr. A Packia Raj and others v. State and others, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 387 Kamalanathan and others v. State and others, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 388 Gokul Ajith and others v. The State, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 389 Kanthan v State and others, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 390 K.J.Suriyanarayanan v. State and another, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 391 Jegan @ Ellamaran and others v. State and another, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 392 M Satheesh v. Secretary, Revenue Department and others, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 393 Melmaruvathur Adhiparasakthi Institute of Medical Sciences v. Union of India and others, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 394 Anandam Gundluru v. Inspector of Police, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 395 Minor V Amrutha v. Council for Architecture and another, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 396 S.Ravi Selvan v. Central Board of Indirect Taxes & customs and others, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 397 Andal Dorairaj & Ors. versus M/s. Rithwik Infor Park Pvt. Ltd. & Ors., 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 398 TCI Freight Versus The Assistant Commissioner, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 399 Kasthuribha and Indira Nagar Residents Welfare Forum v. Secretary, PWD, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 400 Nordex India Private Limited Versus Commissioner of Customs, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 401 Deepan v State, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 402 B Ramkumar Adityan v District Collector, Thoothukudi, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 403 Registrar Judicial v. Shankar @ Savukku Sankar and others, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 404 Innovators Facade Systems Ltd. versus Larsen & Toubro Limited, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 405 Sasikala v. The Revenue Divisional Officer and others, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 406 Nethrodaya v. The State of Tamil Nadu and others, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 407 M/s.D.K.Enterprises Versus The Assistant /Deputy Commissioner (ST), 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 408 R Muthukumaran v. State of Tamil Nadu and others, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 409 Sowdha Mani v. State, 2022 Livelaw (Mad) 410 M.Mallika Mahal Versus The Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 411 Manokaran v. State, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 412 Dr. R Radhakrishnan v. The Assistant Commissioner of Police and another, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 413 V Anusha v. B Krishnan, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 414 Gotla Alex Binoy v. IOP Chennai, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 415 Richa Sharma v. Ganesh Kasinathan, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 416 SJ Sheik Abul Asim v The Registrar cum Chairman and others, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 417 Mohammed Siddiq v. Rasheeda Begum and another, 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 418 REPORTS 1. "It Has Become A Fashion To Make Such Comments": Madras HC Grants Conditional Bail To Stunt Master Kanal Kannan Case Title: V Kannan v State Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 376 The Madras High Court on Thursday granted conditional bail to Hindu Munnani office bearer and stunt master Kanal Kannan for his remarks seeking to demolish the statur of Periyar outside Srirangam temple. The court while granting bail, however, criticised the recent trend of making such remarks. The court stated that it had become a fashion to make such comments. Justice GK Ilanthiraiyan granted him bail on condition that he shall file an affidavit before the Egmore Court guaranteeing that he will not make any such statements in the future. He has also been directed to appear before the police two times for a period of four weeks. 2. TN Govt Prescribed "Very Low" Parking Fees In Cinema Theaters: High Court Quashes GO Case Title: Woodlands Theatres v. State of Tamil Nadu Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Mad) 377 The Madras High Court recently found that the charges fixed by Tamil Nadu government for parking in cinema theaters is "very low" and directed the State to re-fix the same, keeping in view the fees levied by Municipal Corporations and Railway authorities. Rule 91(B) of Tamil Nadu Cinemas Regulation Rules 1957 empower the State to fix parking charges for the vehicles parked in the cinema theatres in the state. The petitioner theatre had challenged the fee fixation claiming that parking rates for all other places except cinema...

Madras High Court Monthly Digest - September 2022 [Citations 376 to 418]

Upasana Sajeev

Tags