Allahabad High Court Weekly Round-Up: August 21 to August 27, 2023

NOMINAL INDEX Sunita Sharma and Another vs. State of U.P. and 3 Others 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 271 Paltoo Ram Yadav vs. State Of U.P. And 6 Others 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 272 M. Devaraj vs. Rakesh Kumar Sharma And 5 Others 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 273 Vishwajeet vs. State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 274 Krishna Kumar vs. State Of U.P.Thru Prin. Secy.Home Deptt. Lko And Ors 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 275 Neha Singh vs. State Of U.P. And 2 Others 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 276 Praveen Kumar vs. State of U.P. And 2 Others 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 277 Govardhan vs. State of U.P. 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 278 Prabhat Bhatnagar vs. State of U.P. and Others 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 279 Mahant Dinesh Das Disciple vs. State Of U.P. And 5 Others 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 280 M/S B L Pahariya Medical Store v. State of U.P. and Another 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 281 Pawan Sut @ Ram Sukh Tiwari vs. The State Of U.P. 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 282 Jugal vs. State Of U.P. 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 283 M/s Hotel The Grand Tulsi and 15 Others v. State of U.P. And & others 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 284 Mahadev Enterprises Firm and 2 others vs. State of UP and 5 Others 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 285 M/S Manoj Steel Traders vs. State Of U.P. And 2 Others 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 286 Abu Talib Husain And Another vs. State of U.P. and Another 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 287 Bhanwar Singh @ Karamvir vs. State of U.P. 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 288 Kusum Devi And Another vs. State of U.P. and Another 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 289 Gurucharan Das vs. Tribhuvan Pal And 2 Others 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 290Ram Kumar v. State of U.P. and Another 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 291Pankaj Kumar Priyam vs. State Of U.P. And 2 Others 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 292 ORDERS/JUDGMENTS OF THE WEEK Allahabad High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Appointment Of State Law Officers Citing Parallel Proceedings Case Title: Sunita Sharma and Another vs. State of U.P. and 3 Others 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 271 [WPIL No. 1578/2023] Case Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 271 The Allahabad High Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) plea which challenged the appointment of the Advocates by the State Government as Additional Advocate General (AAG), Additional Government Advocate (AGA), Additional Chief Standing Counsel (Addl. CSC), Standing Counsels (SC), Brief Holders Civil and Brief Holder Criminal. The bench comprising Chief Justice Pritinker Diwaker and Justice Ashutosh Srivastava noted that an identical PIL was filed before a coordinate bench of the same court and is still pending. "In view of the fact that a coordinate Bench of this Court is already seized of the issues raised in this petition as noticed herein above, we are not inclined to entertain this writ PIL and the same is dismissed." UP Revenue Code 2006 | Final Order In First Appeal Can Be Challenged In Revision U/S 210: Allahabad High Court Case Title: Paltoo Ram Yadav vs. State Of U.P. And 6 Others [WRIT C No. 10192 of 2023] Case Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 272 The Allahabad High Court has held that remedy of revision under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 is available against the final order passed by the Commissioner in appeal under Section 207 of the Code, 2006. The bench comprising of Justice Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava held that the ‘proceeding decided’ in Section 210 (Power to call for the records) of the Code would include the final order passed by the Commissioner in appeal. No Right To Appeal Against Orders Passed At Preliminary Stage Unless It Has A Bearing On Party's Rights In Contest: Allahabad High Court Case Title: M. Devaraj vs. Rakesh Kumar Sharma And 5 Others [SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 600 of 2023] Case Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 273 The Allahabad High Court has held that merely calling for an explanation from an officer does not amount to any legal injury if neither stricture has been passed nor disparaging or harsh remarks have been made against him. The bench comprising Justices Saumitra Dayal Singh and Rajendra Kumar-IV held that sitting in intra-court appeal jurisdiction, it cannot set aside an interlocutory order merely because inconvenience may have arisen to the alleged erring officer. There must be injury caused to the officer because of the interlocutory order to warrant interference in appellate jurisdiction. Allahabad HC Grants Bail To 'Minor' Accused Of Posting FB Comments Against Goddess Durga, Was In Jail Since Sep 2022 Case Title: Vishwajeet vs. State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 274 [CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 14479 of 2022] Case Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 274 The Allahabad High Court granted bail to a minor who has been accused of posting comments against Goddess Durga on his Facebook Account. Perusing his High School Marks-sheet and Aadhar card showing his year of birth to be January 2006, the bench of Justice Subhash Vidyarthi directed to release him on...

Allahabad High Court Weekly Round-Up: August 21 to August 27, 2023

Sparsh Upadhyay

Tags