Allahabad High Court Weekly Round-Up : May 26 - June 1, 2025

NOMINAL INDEX Meenu Rajvanshi v. Brijesh 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 191 Azhar Ali v. State Of U.P. And 2 Others 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 192 Rajendra Prasad Tripathi vs. Hindustan Aeronautics Limited Through Chairman 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 193 In re Ashok Pandey 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 194 Lavkush Tiwari And 1486 Others v. The State Of U.P. And 2 Others 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 195 Tinku Bhargav @ Yatendra vs. State of U.P 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 196 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 197 Antram Goyal v. Power Grid Neemrana Bareilly Transmission Limited And Others 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 198 Waqf Madarsa Qasimul Uloom v. State Of U.P. And 2 Others 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 199 Rahul Gandhi vs. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Distt. Lko. and Another 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 200 Raman Sahni vs. State Of U.P. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 201 Zaitek Polyblends Pvt. Ltd. v. Sri Durga Bansal Fertilizer Ltd. 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 202 Krishna Kumar Gupta v. Priti Gupta 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 203 M/S Metro Amusement Pvt. Ltd. Abu Plaza, Abulane v. Union Of India And Another 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 204 ORDERS/JUDGMENTS OF THE WEEK Spouse Can't Amend Pleadings To Seek Restitution Of Conjugal Rights After 10 Years Into Divorce Case, Dilatory Tactics: Allahabad High Court Case Title: Meenu Rajvanshi v. Brijesh [FIRST APPEAL No. - 49 of 2025] Case citation : 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 191 The Allahabad High Court has held that an amendment application in divorce proceedings cannot be allowed after a delay of 10 years when the party was aware of the facts at the time of institution of suit. It held that such amendment application is only to prolong litigation and cannot be entertained at the stage of final hearing. Jamia Urdu "Distributing Degrees" Without Proper Classes: Allahabad High Court Denies Relief Of Appointment To Such Degree Holders Case Title: Azhar Ali v. State Of U.P. And 2 Others Case citation : 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 192 Stating that the minority educational institution Jamia Urdu, Aligarh is "distributing degrees" without proper classes, the Allahabad High Court denied to such degree holders any right to appointment as Assistant Teacher (Urdu Language) in Primary Schools run by Uttar Pradesh Basic Education Board. Petitioners (in connected cases) pleaded that they had all obtained degrees in Adib-E-Kamil from Jamia Urdu, Aligarh and were eligible to be appointed as Assistant Teacher (Urdu Language) in Primary Schools run by U.P. Basic Education Board. All petitioners appeared in U.P. Teachers Eligibility Test - 2013 and cleared the same. When Two Procedures Exist Under Standing Orders, Management May Select Either Unless Mala Fide Proven: Allahabad HC Case title - Rajendra Prasad Tripathi vs. Hindustan Aeronautics Limited Through Chairman Case citation : 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 193 A single judge bench of justice Brijraj Singh dismissed a writ petition, holding that Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) properly followed their Standing Orders by striking off the employee's name following his unauthorised absence. The court found that the employee was given adequate opportunity through show cause notices, and that the petition suffered from inexcusable delay. Allahabad HC Rejects Advocate's Plea To Recall Order Sentencing Him To 6 Months In Jail For Calling Judges 'Goondas' Case title – In re Ashok Pandey Case citation : 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 194 The Allahabad High Court on Monday refused to recall its April order sentencing Lucknow-based Advocate Ashok Pandey to six months' simple imprisonment for using abusive language against HC judges and calling them 'goondas' in open court in 2021. Pandey was found guilty of committing criminal contempt of court by a bench of Justice Vivek Chaudhary and Justice Brij Raj Singh, as it concluded that Pandey's conduct showed that he treats the judicial process with “utter disdain” and continued to undermine the dignity and integrity of the institution with impunity. Village Policemen Not Equal To Home Guards: Allahabad High Court Refuse To Interfere With Their Remuneration Case Title: Lavkush Tiwari And 1486 Others v. The State Of U.P. And 2 Others [WRIT - A No. - 18956 of 2022] Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 195 The Allahabad High Court has held that Village Policemen are not equal to Policemen working in regular establishment and Home Guards and are thus not entitled to basic pay disbursed to policemen working in regular police force. It held that the duties of the Village Policemen, who were first appointed during British Raj era, have now become rudimentary and have been taken over by technological advancements. Allahabad High Court Grants Bail To BJP Leader Accused Of Beheading Friend In Agra Case title - Tinku Bhargav @ Yatendra vs. State of U.P 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 196 Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 196 The Allahabad High Court on Monday granted bail to...

Allahabad High Court Weekly Round-Up : May 26 - June 1, 2025

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

Tags