Tax Cases Weekly Round-Up: 12 November To 18 November, 2023

Mariya Paliwala

19 Nov 2023 8:30 AM GMT

  • Tax Cases Weekly Round-Up: 12 November To 18 November, 2023

    Supreme Court UP VAT Act | Assessee Entitled To Claim Full Input Tax Credit On Exempted Goods Produced As By-Products Or Waste Products During Manufacturing Of Taxable Goods: Supreme Court Case details: M/S Modi Naturals Ltd v The Commissioner of Commercial Tax UP Case No.: 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 976 The Supreme Court while relying on Explanation (iii) to Section 13 of...

    Supreme Court

    UP VAT Act | Assessee Entitled To Claim Full Input Tax Credit On Exempted Goods Produced As By-Products Or Waste Products During Manufacturing Of Taxable Goods: Supreme Court

    Case details: M/S Modi Naturals Ltd v The Commissioner of Commercial Tax UP

    Case No.: 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 976

    The Supreme Court while relying on Explanation (iii) to Section 13 of Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2008 (“UP VAT Act”), has held that if during the manufacture of any taxable good any tax exempted goods are produced as by-product/waste product, then it shall be deemed that the goods purchased from within the State for such manufacturing have been used in manufacture of taxable goods alone. Thus, the Assessee would be entitled to claim full benefit of Input Tax Credit (“ITC”) in respect of taxable goods purchased from within the State.

    UP VAT Act | Definition Of “Goods” Under Sec. 2(m) And Sec. 13(1)(f) Includes Taxable As Well As Exempted Goods: Supreme Court

    Case details: M/S Modi Naturals Ltd v The Commissioner of Commercial Tax Up

    The Supreme Court has held that the definition of “Goods” under Section 2(m) of Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2008 (“UP VAT Act”) includes both taxable as well as exempted goods. Similarly, the word “goods” under Section 13(1)(f) of the UP VAT Act cannot be said to be qualified by the word “taxable”.

    Delhi High Court

    Concealment Of Income Above Rs.50 Lakhs, Extended Period Of Limitation Would Apply: Delhi High Court

    Case Title: Ganesh Dass Khanna Versus ITO

    The Delhi High Court has held that an extended period of 10 years would apply in serious tax evasion cases where there was evidence of concealment of income above Rs. 50 lakhs.

    Wrongful Application Of Foreign Contribution By Trust Not In Accordance With Trust’s Objective: Delhi High Court Upholds Reassessment

    Case Title: Enviornics Trust Versus The Dept. Commissioner Of Income Tax

    The Delhi High Court has upheld the reassessment proceedings against a trust for wrongful application of foreign contribution, which was against the objective of the trust.

    TRU Can’t Issue Clarification Regarding Classification Of Polypropylene Woven And Non-Woven Bags Under Customs Tariff Act, 1975: Delhi High Court

    Case Title: Association Of Technical Textiles Manufacturers And Processors & Anr. Versus UOI

    The Delhi High Court has held that the Tax Research Unit (TRU) cannot issue clarification regarding the classification of polypropylene woven and non-woven bags under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.

    Delhi Gymkhana Club Exigible To Tax Under Delhi Tax On Luxuries Act, 1996: Delhi High Court

    Case Title: Delhi Gymkhana Club Versus Commissioner (Luxury Tax), New Delhi & Ors.

    The Delhi High Court has held that Delhi Gymkhana Club is exigible to tax under the Delhi Tax on Luxuries Act, 1996.

    AO Lacked Tangible Material To Form A Belief That Income, Chargeable To Tax Had Escaped Assessment: Delhi High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice

    Case Title: Saraswati Petrochem Pvt. Ltd. Versus Income Tax Officer

    The Delhi High Court has held that AO did not have the tangible material on record that could have persuaded him to form the belief that income, otherwise chargeable to tax, had escaped assessment.

    Bombay High Court

    Amount Received In Satisfaction Of The Inheritance Rights Is Not A Taxable Income: Bombay High Court

    Case Title: Ramona Pinto v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Income Tax Appeal No. 2610 of 2018

    The High Court of Bombay has held that an An amount received in satisfaction of the inheritance rights is not a taxable income.

    Firm Liable To Pay Tax On Distribution Of Capital Assets On Dissolution And Not Partner: Bombay High Court

    Case Title: Ramona Pinto Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

    The Bombay High Court has held that, as per Section 45(4) of the Income Tax Act, assuming that there was a distribution of capital assets upon dissolution of the firm, it is the firm and not the partner who has to pay the tax.

    Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Proceedings Against Non-Existent Entity Despite Active PAN

    Case Title: Diversey India Hygiene Private Limited Versus ACIT

    The Bombay High Court has quashed the reassessment proceedings against non-existent entities despite an active PAN.

    Bombay High Court Quashes Income Tax Assessments Against Agriculturist And Rickshaw Driver For Improper Sanction

    Case Title: Chandar Mahadev Naik Versus Income Tax Officer

    The Bombay High Court has quashed the income tax assessments for the assessment year 2016-2017 against agriculturists and rickshaw drivers for improper sanction.

    Bombay High Court Direct JAO To Provide Specific Information Relied Upon To Issue The Section 148A(b) Notice

    Case Title: Ganesh Ramesh Chavan Versus Income Tax Officer

    The Bombay High Court has directed the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) to provide specific information relied upon to issue the notice under Section 148A(B) of the Income Tax Act.

    Amount Of Arbitration Award Received By Retiring Partner For Relinquishing Claim In The Firm Is Not Taxable: Bombay High Court

    Case Title: Ramona Pinto v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

    The High Court of Bombay has held that an amount of arbitration award received by a retiring partner for relinquishing its claim in the firm is not a taxable income.

    Madras High Court

    Income Tax Adjudication Proceedings And Criminal Prosecution Are Independent To Each Other: Madras High Court

    Case Title: R.Revathy Versus ACIT

    Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 349

    The Madras High Court has held that income tax adjudication proceedings and criminal prosecution are independent of each other; the pendency of one does not affect the other.

    GST Council Can Recommend Rate But Can’t Determine Classification: Madras High Court Allows Parle Agro’s Petition Challenging Classification Of Flavoured Milk

    Case Title: M/s.Parle Agro Pvt. Ltd. Versus Union of India

    Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 352

    The Madras High Court has allowed Parle Agro’s petition challenging the classification of flavoured milk.

    Madras High Court Directs Dept. To Investigate Misuse Of Login ID By Unknown Person Facilitating Tax Evasion

    Case Title: M/s.Shewil Trading Company Versus The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes

    Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 353

    The Madras High Court has directed the state tax officer to investigate the misuse of login IDs by unknown persons facilitating tax evasion.

    Filing Of Form-67 After Filing ITR But Before Issuance Of Intimation, Amounts To Due Compliance: Madras High Court Allows Foreign Tax Credit Claim

    Case Title: Duraiswamy Kumaraswamy Versus PCIT

    The Madras High Court has allowed the Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) claim on the grounds that filing Form-67 after filing the Income Tax Return (ITR) but before the issuance of an intimation amounts to due compliance.

    Rajasthan High Court

    Rajasthan High Court Stays Cess Demand Against Hotelier, Who Is A Subsequent Purchaser

    Case Title: Khum Singh Balla Versus State Of Rajasthan

    The Rajasthan High Court has stayed the cess demand against the hotelier, who was the subsequent purchaser.

    Allahabad High Court

    Allahabad High Court Grants Interim Relief To Anand And Anand, Stays Show Cause Notice Demanding Refund Of Rs.138 Crores

    The Allahabad High Court has granted interim relief to Anand and Anand Law Firm by staying the proceedings initiated under the Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017.

    Authenticity Of Transaction Cannot Be Disputed If E-Way Bill Not Cancelled Within Time: Allahabad HC

    Case Title: M/S Sun Flag Iron And Steel Company Limited v. State Of U.P. And 3 Others

    The Allahabad High Court held that once e-way bill has been generated by the assessee and the same has not been cancelled within the time prescribed in the Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, movement of goods and genuineness of a transaction cannot be disputed by the Department.

    Telangana High Court

    Telangana High Court; GST Exemption Doesn't Cover Affiliation Fee And Inspection Fee Paid By Colleges To University

    Case Title: Care College of Nursing and others. Versus Kaloji Narayana Rao University of Health Sciences, Rep by its Registrar, and others.

    The Telangana High Court has held that GST exemption as granted under Notification No.12 of 2017 of the GST Act, 2017 to the institutions providing education services does not cover Affiliation fee and Inspection fee paid by the College to the University.

    ITAT

    ITAT Deletes Income Tax Addition Of Rs.2.30 Crores As AO Failed To Mention Investment Outside The Books Of Accounts

    Case Title: ITO Versus Direct Trading Co. P. Ld.

    The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted the income tax addition of Rs. 2.30 crores as the Assessing Officer (AO) did not mention any investment outside the books of accounts.

    Unsold Flats Which Are In Stock In Trade Should Be Assessed As "Business Income": ITAT

    Case Title: M/s. Coronate Constructions Versus PCIT

    The Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has observed that unsold flats that are in stock in trade should be assessed under the heading "business income".

    ITAT Dirests ALP Computation Towards Guarantee Commission @ 0.3523% In Case Of Macrotech Developers

    Case Title: Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax Versus M/s Macrotech Developers Limited

    The Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has directed the ALP Computation Towards Guarantee Commission at a rate of 0.3523% in the case of Macrotech Developers.

    Rates On Which Power Is Available Through Indian Energy Exchange Can’t Be Applied As It Is Not Rates To Consumers But Rates To DISCOM: ITAT Deletes TP Adjustment

    Case Title: M/s. Tata Steel Ltd. Versus DCIT

    The Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted the Transfer Pricing (TP) Adjustment as rates on which power is available through the Indian Energy Exchange cannot be applied because these are not the rates to the consumers but rates to the DISCOMs.

    Case Title: M/s. Tata AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Service Tax-VI, Mumbai

    The Mumbai Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that without an opening assessment of the provision of service extended by the service provider, CENVAT credits cannot be denied to the recipient who had paid the required service tax through the service receiver in order to avail the input services.

    Sun Pharmaceuticals Danazol Eligible For Excise Duty Exemption: CESTAT

    Case Title: M/s. Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise

    The Chennai Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that the product ‘Danazol’ of Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd. is eligible for excise duty exemption.

    Case Title: C.S.T.-Service Tax - Ahmedabad Versus Ramky Infrastructure Ltd.

    The Ahmedabad Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that no service tax is payable on the service of laying a pipeline for the Gujarat Water Supply and Sewerage Board (GWSSB).


    Next Story