31 July 2018 12:26 PM GMT
With India home to largest number of malnourished children, the Supreme Court on Tuesday issued notice to the Centre, States and Union Territories on a PIL seeking revision of budget for midday meals and enhancement in its calorific content, a court-supervised quality assurance system and an audit of all schemes and facilities implementing child nutrition and education programmes, by...
With India home to largest number of malnourished children, the Supreme Court on Tuesday issued notice to the Centre, States and Union Territories on a PIL seeking revision of budget for midday meals and enhancement in its calorific content, a court-supervised quality assurance system and an audit of all schemes and facilities implementing child nutrition and education programmes, by a court-appointed third party commission, besides other reliefs to remove various inadequacies plaguing the mid-day meal scheme across country.
A bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra issued the notice on the PIL filed by ES Ramamurthy, a former engineer, who has been working closely with the underprivileged children in the field of education.
The petitioner has moved the apex court through advocate Satya Mitra.
In his PIL drawn by advocate Olivia Bang, the petitioner has sought various reliefs for enhancing the scope and funding of the Mid-Day Meal Scheme (MDMS).
“The need for such intervention arises from the glaring inadequacies and violations of the existing MDMS parameters across the country, as well as a pressing need to revise the said parameters to account for required funding, mechanism to impose liability on the State and, upgrading the nutritional need limits in accordance with research-approved standards,” he said.
The petitioner said the MDMS suffers from inadequacy, mismanagement and lag vis-à-vis budgetary allocations; grossly inadequate calorific content of meals (in practice as well as in the legally mandated stipulation); infrastructural shortfalls such as absence of kitchen sheds, dining halls etc.; jurisdictional overlap among ministries as the Central and State-level leading to no accountability or effective redressal mechanism; poorly calculated cooking-cost and miscommunication as to Centre-state cost sharing; lack of scientific methods in setting nutritional standards etc.
The petitioner filed the PIL following a personal experience in April 2016 when he visited a drought-affected rural district of Bangalore.
From his experience, he shared, “…although it was a holiday for students, 45 out of a total strength of 77, were present that day only for the sake of the meal. Most of these children admitted to were not getting any breakfast at home, and none of them felt that the food they got at home was any better than their Mid-day meal at school. The children also eagerly anticipated days when any surplus food would be distributed later. This clearly reveals the abject need for proper meals.”
Revision of calorific content
The PIL prays for revision of calorific content of mid-day meals.
“In most rural areas, children help out with household chores and livelihood work (such as work in the fields) - both these activities, coupled with usual levels of activity of the children results in moderate to vigorous levels of physical activity. In this scenario, the calorie limit of the meals must be contextualized to account for the actual levels of energy typically expended by children,” it said.
According to research published by the Indian Council for Medical Research (ICMR), boys in the age group 6/14 need 1,510–2,880 Kcals per day which rises to 1,760– 3,010 Kcals under a vigorous activity regime, while girls need 1,400–2,260 Kcals in the normal course, increasing to 1,610–2,570 Kcals when vigorously active.
“Since each school will have a different mix of age groups for boys and girls, who in turn could be moderately or vigorously active physically, a median daily need of 2,300 Kcals and 2,000 Kcals can be presumed for a boy and a girl. With a typical mix of an equal number of boys and girls, the daily need for purposes of planning a meal in the school would work out to 2,150 Kcals. Against this, the MDMS provides 600 Kcals–averaged between 450 and 750 Kcals, respectively. This indicates that there is a gap varying from 460 to 1,100 Kcals depending on the age of the child. It is thus apparent that the calorie limit set for the MDMS lacks any scientific or empirical basis and, must be revised to ensure it is actually, not merely ostensibly, effective in tackling the problem of malnutrition,” said the PIL.
The PIL makes following prayers:
Read the Petition Here