Top Stories

SC Slams Kerala Govt For Delay In Re-Appointing Senkumar As ĐGP: Imposes 25k Cost For Seeking Modification Of Order

LiveLaw News Network
5 May 2017 5:46 AM GMT
SC Slams Kerala Govt For Delay In Re-Appointing Senkumar As ĐGP: Imposes 25k Cost For Seeking Modification Of Order
Your free access to Live Law has expired
To read the article, get a premium account.
    Your Subscription Supports Independent Journalism
Subscription starts from
(For 6 Months)
Premium account gives you:
  • Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.
  • Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.
Already a subscriber?

Pulling up Kerala government for the delay in re-appointing T P Senkumar as DGP despite its order on April 24, the Supreme Court today refused to admit a plea filed by the state for a modification/clarification and imposed a cost of Rs 25,000.

"We can impose cost even if you are withdrawing the petition", a bench headed by Justice Madan B Lokur told senior lawyer Sidharth Luthra who appeared for the state and opposed imposition of the cost when the state was withdrawing the plea.

Meanwhile the bench issued notice to the state on a contempt petition filed by Senkumar against Kerala Chief Secretary Nalini Netto for delaying his reinstatement as the State Police Chief as ordered by the Supreme Court.

At the outset, Senior lawyer Dushyant Dave who appeared for Senkumar accused the state of making a mockery of the apex court order.

When state government submitted "the time taken was because the file was under process", Dave shot back "when he was to be removed it did not even take 24 hours. Even so many days after the apex court order they say the file is in process. This is nothing but gross contempt".

It was on 24th April the division bench of Justices Madan B Lokur and Deepak Gupta directed the state government to reinstate Dr. Senkumar as Kerala DGP.

The Contempt Petition filed through Advocate Haris Beeran states that the Petitioner wrote a communication dated 25.4.2017 to the Chief Secretary  Nalini Netto to expeditiously carry out the directions of the Apex Court and to issue appropriate instructions regarding the same.

“The intention of the Respondent Contemnor, who is the authority to issue orders of reinstatement, seems to delay the implementation wilfully so that the Petitioner will not get the fruits of the decree which he has got. The Contemnor is also conscious of the fact that once this Hon’ble Court closes for summer recess on 9th may 2017, it reopens only on 3rd July, 2017 which will make the Petitioner remediless and thus frustrate the judgment of this Hon’ble Court”,states the Petition.

Dr. Senkumar has also requested the top court to consider extending the tenure of the Petitioner as State Police Chief for the period which was illegally taken off from him. He was appointed as the State Police Chief on 22.5.2015 for a period of 2 years and he was removed, illegally, as found by the Court on 1.6.2016.

SC had concluded that Senkumar’s removal took place in a most arbitrary manner without following the established process of law Senior advocate Dushyant Dave, who appeared for the ousted DGP  had argued that his removal from the post by Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan can only be related to his independent and thorough investigation into the political violence in the state in which several CPI(M) leaders had come under the probe and had nothing to do with his handling of Jisha murder case or Puttingal fire tragedy as alleged by the state government.

Next Story