SC Upholds Classification of Pre- and Post-Nov 2002 Bank Retirees For Dearness Relief, Says Adopting Flat Rate Would Be Hazardous [Read Judgment]

The Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld the distinction between pre-November 2002 bank retirees and post-November 2002 retirees in payment of dearness relief as it said both the categories of retirees stand on different footing and the parameters which govern the computation of dearness relief are also on a different level, while also noting that any stepping up of benefit for a section of employees is bound to inflate the figure of Rs.1288 crores per annum which was set apart for the benefit of the employees vide a 2005 bipartite settlement.A bench of Justice Adarsh Kumar Goel and Justice Uday Umesh Lalit said so while deciding the appeal filed by the United Bank of India and others against the Calcutta High Court judgment of September, 2016, whereby it was held that there was no justification for making a distinction between pre- and post-2002 retirees and the appellant (bank) must pay dearness relief to all pensioners at the same rate.The apex court was in agreement with the decision of the Madras High Court in case titled AB Kasturirangan v. Canara Bank etc., which had been confirmed by the apex court by the time the instant appeal was filed, as it said, “In our considered view, the assessment made by the Division Bench of the Madras High Court was absolutely correct. The settlement has to be taken as a package deal and it would be impossible to hold certain parts good and acceptable while finding other parts to be bad. Moreover, the recitals D, E and F in the Bipartite settlement dated 02.06.2005…show that a package deal was entered into and Rs.1288 crores per annum towards all the benefits was set apart for the benefit of the employees. Any stepping up of benefit for a section of employees is bound to inflate the figure of Rs.1288 crores per annum though that by itself is not a ground that weighs with us. In our view both the categories of retirees, namely, pre November 2002 and post November, 2002 stand on different footing, the parameters which govern the computation of dearness relief are also on a different level”.“…this is not a matter where a section of employees merely on account of date of retirement are being differentiated. If we adopt a flat rate of 0.24% as is being prayed for, the class of retirees who retired before 01.11.2002 will stand conferred better rate than those employees who retired after 01.11.2002. Nor can we apply a flat rate of 0.18% for them. Each class is governed by distinct and different parameters. These are all matters of policy making. The conferral of advantages of benefits on two different classes of retirees has a completely distinct formula and rates and it would not be possible to have a synthesis on any count or to put both the sets of retirees on any common parameters. Both classes are distinct and do not form a homogenous group. It would be extremely difficult and hazardous to adopt a flat rate as is sought to be projected,” the apex court held.It is to be noted that a Memorandum of Settlement dated October 29, 1993 was entered into between the managements of 58 banks as represented by the Indian Banks’ Association on one hand and their workmen as represented by the All India Bank Employees’ Association on the other. This memorandum recited that the parties had agreed to introduce pension scheme in banks for the workmen/employees in lieu of employers’ contribution to the provident fund and that the pension scheme so agreed was to be broadly on Central Government/Reserve Bank of India pattern.Paragraph 6 of the memorandum dealt with Dearness Allowance relief to the pensioners and it stipulated that, “Dearness relief to pensioners will be granted at such rates as may be determined from time to time in line with the Dearness Allowance formula in operation in Reserve Bank of India”.On June 2, 2005, a bipartite settlement was arrived at between the managements of 50 banks, represented by the Indian Banks’ Association on one hand and their workmen, represented by the All India Bank Employees’ Association, National Federation of Bank Employees, Bank Employees’ Federation of India, Indian National Bank Employees’ Federation and National Association of Bank Workers on the other hand.In case of employees who had retired during the period 01.04.1998 to 31.10.2002, dearness relief at the rate of 0.24% was awardable upto Rs.3550 of basic pension per month and thereafter the percentage for amounts in excess of Rs.3550 was successively at reduced rates. On the other hand, in case of employees who retired during the period 01.11.2002 to 30.04.2005, the percentage of 0.18% was without any such tapering formula.The idea of tapering formula under the bipartite settlement dated 27.04.2010 was retained with respect to pre-November 2002 retirees, while the dearness relief to post-November 2002 retirees was to be at the flat rate of 0.18%. Around this time, the Reserve Bank of India, which initially was not giving full compensation against price rise on dearness relief to employees...

SC Upholds Classification of Pre- and Post-Nov 2002 Bank Retirees For Dearness Relief, Says Adopting Flat Rate Would Be Hazardous [Read Judgment]

akanksha jain

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

akanksha jain

SC Upholds Classification of Pre- and Post-Nov 2002 Bank Retirees For Dearness Relief, Says Adopting Flat Rate Would Be Hazardous [Read Judgment]

akanksha jain

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

akanksha jain

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers