News Updates

Stay on Maratha reservation continues as Supreme Court declines to interfere with Bombay HC stay-order

Gaurav Pathak
19 Dec 2014 4:52 AM GMT
Stay on Maratha reservation continues as Supreme Court declines to interfere with Bombay HC stay-order
Your free access to Live Law has expired
To read the article, get a premium account.
    Your Subscription Supports Independent Journalism
Subscription starts from
(For 6 Months)
Premium account gives you:
  • Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.
  • Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.
Already a subscriber?

“It is just an interim order, let the Bombay High Court decide it,” said the Bench headed by Chief Justice of India HL Dattu on Thursday while hearing the appeals filed by many parties in relation to the Bombay High Court order regarding 16 per cent reservation to Marathas in jobs and educational institutions by the Maharashtra government. The Bombay High Court had stayed the implementation of Maratha reservation.

Many parties, including the State of Maharashtra approached Supreme Court against the stay order given by the High Court, but the Apex Court refused to interfere with the High Court order. It also said, “However, we request the High Court to dispose of the writ petition as expeditiously as possible.”

However, the Apex Court was informed that the High Court judge who is hearing the matter has given his final views on the matter at the interim stage itself. Thereafter, the Bench consisting of CJI Dattu and Justice A.K. Sikri said that the same judge would now no longer hear the petition and the same would be transferred to some other judge.

It is not the first time that the Bombay High Court has adjudicated on reservations. Earlier, the High Court had stayed five percent reservations for Muslims in government service but had allowed quotas for them in educational institutions.The High Court had said that according to the Supreme Court headings, reservation could not surpass 50 percent.

The state government had contended in the High Court that the two groups were socially, instructively and economically backward, saying that its choice was focused around the report of a board headed by previous Minister Narayan Rane, set up to investigate the issue.

Next Story