Supreme Court quashes 214 coal blocks allocation since 1993, levies penalty of Rs. 295/- per metric ton of coal extracted

A Supreme Court Bench comprising of Chief Justice R.M. Lodha, Justice Madan B. Lokur and Justice Kurian Joseph today quashed the allocation of 214 out of 218 coal blocks which were allotted to companies since 1993. It was claimed that around Rs. 2 lakh crores were invested in the same.The Court stated, "Our judgment highlighted the illegality and arbitrariness in the allotment of coal blocks and these "consequence proceedings" are intended to correct the wrong done by the Union of India; these proceedings look to the future in that by highlighting the wrong, it is expected that the Government will not deal with the natural resources that belong to the country as if they belong to a few individuals who can fritter them away at their sweet will; these proceedings may also compensate the exchequer for the loss caused to it, in the manner suggested by the learned Attorney General Learned Attorney General identified 46 coal blocks that could be "saved" from the guillotine, since all of them have commenced production or are on the verge of commencing production. As these allocations are also illegal and arbitrary they are also liable to be cancelled."However, the allotment of three coal blocks was not disturbed and they are Moher and Moher Amroli Extension allocated to Sasan Power Ltd. (UMPP) and Tasra (allotted to Steel Authority of India Ltd. (SAIL), a Central Government public sector undertaking not having any joint venture).A judgment was delivered in these cases on 25th August, 2014 and it was held that the allotment of coal blocks made by the Screening Committee of the Government of India, as also the allotments made through the Government dispensation route are arbitrary and illegal. Since the conclusion arrived at would have potentially had far-reaching consequences, on which submissions were not made when the case was heard, the question of what should be the consequences of the declaration was left open for hearing. Read the Live Law story here.For the purposes of these "consequence proceedings", the Union of India filed an affidavit dated 8th September, 2014. It is stated in the affidavit that coal is actually being mined from 40 coal blocks listed in Annexure I to the affidavit. This list includes two coal blocks allotted to an Ultra Mega Power Projects (Sasan Power Ltd. [UMPP] allotted the coal blocks Moher and Moher Amroli Extension). Coal blocks allotted to UMPPs have not been disturbed in the judgment.It was stated that 6 more coal blocks were ready for extraction of coal in 2014-2015. Therefore, the affidavit stated that 40 coal blocks are already producing coal and 6 coal blocks are in a position to produce coal virtually with immediate effect. The question was whether the allotment of these coal blocks should be cancelled or not.It was submitted that Coal India Limited (CIL) a public sector undertaking can take over and continue the extraction of coal from these 44 coal blocks without adversely affecting the rights of those employed therein. However, it was submitted that CIL would require some time to take over the coal blocks and manage its affairs for continuing the mining process. Effectively therefore, it was submitted that even if the allotment of these 44 coal blocks is cancelled, the Central Government can ensure that coal production will not stop.Mr. K.K. Venugopal, Senior Advocate, appearing on behalf of the Coal Producers Association submitted that cancellation of all the coal blocks would have very serious and far reaching consequences. He had submitted that it would greatly impact the economy of the country and would set back the process of extraction and effective utilization of coal by about 7 to 8 years. He also submitted that if the coal blocks are not cancelled, the allottees could continue their contribution towards corporate social responsibility and socio-economic development of the country and that the additional levy of Rs. 295/- per metric ton of coal extracted (described as a penalty) is unjustified.Mr. Harish Salve, Senior Advocate, appearing for the Sponge Iron Manufacturers Association generally supported the submissions made by Mr. Venugopal.Rejecting such contentions, the Bench stated, "The judgment did not deal with any individual case. It dealt only with the process of allotment of coal blocks and found it to be illegal and arbitrary. The process of allotment cannot be reopened collaterally through the appointment of a committee. This would virtually amount to nullifying the judgment. The process is a continuous thread that runs through all the allotments. Since it was fatally flawed, the beneficiaries of the flawed process must suffer the consequences thereof and the appointment of a committee would really amount to permitting a body to examine the correctness of the judgment. This is clearly impermissible."As far the 6 coal blocks were concerned, the Court said that the allocatees have not yet commenced production. They do not stand on a different or better...

Supreme Court quashes 214 coal blocks allocation since 1993, levies penalty of Rs. 295/- per metric ton of coal extracted

Apoorva Mandhani

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Apoorva Mandhani

Supreme Court quashes 214 coal blocks allocation since 1993, levies penalty of Rs. 295/- per metric ton of coal extracted

Apoorva Mandhani

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Apoorva Mandhani

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers