Supreme Court Weekly Round-Up

Section 364A IPC not unconstitutionalThe Supreme Court of India on Friday, dismissed an appeal by a death row convict, and held that Section 364A awarding death penalty as a possible punishment, for kidnapping any person threatening to cause death in order to compel Government or any other person, to pay ransom , is not unconstitutional. Three Judge bench of Justices T.S. Thakur, R.K. Agrawal and Adarsh Kumar Goel examined the background of the Section 364A and held that it was enacted for the safety and security of the citizens and the unity, sovereignty and integrity of the country. You may read the Live Law report and judgment here.No more jail for Ansal Brothers18 years after a massive fire at a theatre in New Delhi’s posh Green Park area snuffed out 59 lives, the Supreme Court on Wednesday let off cinema owners Sushil Ansal and his brother Gopal Ansal merely asking them to pay a fine of Rs 30 crore each to the government within three months. Read Judgment and Live Law report on it here.Police custody even after charge sheet filedIn another judgment, the top court also held this week that, Police can seek Custody of Accused who are arrested even after filing of Charge Sheet. The court was considering a case related to killing of nine persons and injuries to large number of villagers of Village Netai of District Paschim Medinipore in West Bengal. You may read the Live Law report on it here.Kerala specific Palm oil import ban validThe Apex Court has upheld a 2007 Central Government notification prohibiting the import of palm oil through all the ports of Kerala. The Supreme Court bench comprising of Justices A.K. Sikri and Rohinton Fali Nariman held that there is a sufficient public good sought to be achieved by laying down the exception banning the imports of crude palm oil through ports in Kerala. Read the judgment and Live Law report hereCourts can cause no prejudice to anyone A Supreme Court Bench [Chitra vs. State of Kerala & Ors] comprising Justice Vikramajit Sen and Justice Shiva Kirti Singh, while ordering refund of license fee due to non-utilization of license for full term, in the event of unforeseeable circumstances, observed that no person can be prejudiced because of an act of a Court.Bombay HC stay order on FSSAI advisory upheldThe Food safety regulator FSSAI plea against Bombay High Court order staying its 2013 advisory requiring manufacturers to take approvals for the products already in the market, was not entertained by Supreme Court .Dismissing the plea, Supreme Court bench of Justices J S Khehar and C Nagappan said “No ground for interference is made out, in exercise of our jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. The special leave petitions are accordingly dismissed,”.Courts bound to respond to societies’ collective cryThe Apex Court reminded the courts that while imposing sentence, a Court has a duty to respond to the collective cry of the society. The Apex Court said that the agony of the victim or the survivors of the victim cannot be brushed aside.Contempt notice to Delhi Police commissionerContempt of court notice was issued to the Commissioner of Delhi Police.A Bench of Justices J Chelameswar and A M Sapre was shocked and disappointed by the ‘lecture’ given in the report filed by a senior official of Delhi Police’s south district on the manner in which the police functioned although it had failed to execute the arrest warrant issued by the Apex Court.Suspend license for traffic rule violationsIn a major step towards curbing road accidents, a Supreme Court appointed committee on Wednesday asked all the states to suspend license of traffic rule violators, even for over speeding and red light jumping, for a minimum of three months.States misusing public moneyA social justice bench of the Supreme Court comprising Justice M.B. Lokur and Justice U.U. Lalit rapped the States for failing to make use of a staggering Rs 27,000 crore collected in the form of cess for the welfare of the construction workers. This money, the Court reportedly noted, is spent on administration and advertisement and hardly anything reaches the poor.PIL transferred to Punjab and Haryana HCThe Supreme Court , transferred a Public Interest Litigation filed by Dalit Victims of Mirchpur Village, to Punjab and Haryana High Court, to look into their rehabilitation. The Social Justice Bench comprising Justices MB Lokur and U U Lalit, however clarified that the HC would deal only with rehabilitation.Kerala Bar case hearing in SCThe Supreme Court on Thursday picked holes in the new liquor policy of Kerala, which plans to gradually moving towards prohibition, to confine liquor licenses only to 26 five star hotels in the state and asking the three and four star bar owners to open wine and beer parlours.Search Engines violating court order ?The Supreme Court of India has asked search engines like Google India, Yahoo India and Microsoft Corporation (I) Pvt Ltd to respond to the allegations that...

Supreme Court Weekly Round-Up

Ashok KM

Tags