When Two Clauses Of A Deed Are Repugnant, Earlier Clause Will Prevail Over Later Clause : Supreme Court

Recently, the Supreme Court observed that if there is a repugnancy between the earlier and later clauses of a deed, whereby a later clause destroys altogether the obligation created by the earlier clause, then the later clause is to be rejected as repugnant to the earlier clause and the earlier clause prevails. Setting-aside the findings of the High Court and Trial Court, the Bench of...

Supreme Court Refuses To Transfer Margadarsi Chit Fund's Appeals From Andhra Pradesh HC To Telangana HC

The Supreme Court on Friday (February 2) refused to transfer the criminal appeal pending against Margadarsi Chit Fund Private Limited (MCFPL) before the Andhra Pradesh High Court to the Telangana High Court. At the outset, when the matter was called on for hearing, the Bench of Justices Abhay S Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan asked the petitioner's counsel “why do you want to transfer the case arising...

Maharashtra Rent Control Act | Tenant Can't Be Mechanically Evicted Based On Municipality's Demolition Order; Immediacy Must Be Examined : Supreme Court

In a case under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 (“Act”), the Supreme Court observed that the eviction of a tenant cannot be ordered merely based on a demolition notice issued by the Municipal body. The Court has to examine the "immediate urgency" of the need for demolition.The Court made this observation in the context of Section 16(1)(k) of the Act which says "that the premises...

Supreme Court Asks 6 Maharashtra Police Officers To Pay Rs 6 Lakhs Cost To Tenants Who Were Illegally Evicted

The Supreme Court, in a recent judgment, imposed a cost amounting to Rs. 6 lakhs on six police personnel of the Maharashtra Police for conspiring and illegally detaining tenants, coercing them to sign documents against their will, and demolishing the premises in question without any order from a competent court.The tenants claimed that they were forcefully evicted from the rented premises by...

High Court Under S. 482 CrPC Should Not Decide Whether Debt In Cheque Dishonour Case Is Time-Barred: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court recently reiterated that in proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (NI Act), the question of whether the underlying debt is time-barred is based on the evidence. Thus, the High Court should not decide the same in a petition under Section 482 (quashing of FIR) of the CrPC.“Undoubtedly, the question regarding the time-barred nature of an...

Medical Admissions | Supreme Court Approves Centre's Scheme Allowing Resignation From NEET Seats On Joining INIs This Year

Penalties as high as Rs.50 lacs for resigning from medical seats can have the effect of driving away good candidates, the court remarked.

Magistrates Should Summon Accused Only After Recording Satisfaction About Sufficient Grounds To Proceed : Supreme Court

Recently, the Supreme Court observed that a Magistrate, while issuing the summoning order, shall not act in a casual manner; rather they should be satisfied that there exists a sufficient ground for proceedings against the accused. The recording of the satisfaction of the Magistrate while issuing the summons should not be in a cryptic manner but only when a prima facie case is made out from...

Supreme Court Issues Guidelines For Effective Functioning Of Environmental Authorities, Says Regular Auditing Necessary

How effectively environmental bodies are functioning has a direct bearing on protection and restoration of ecological balance, the court said.

Supreme Court Criticises HC For Not Deciding Bail Application On Merits & Disposing It Asking Accused To Approach Trial Court

In a bail application, where the Bombay High Court permitted the accused to file the same before the Trial Court instead of deciding it on merits, the Supreme Court observed that this approach amounts to non-exercise of jurisdiction. The Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act was invoked against the petitioner/ accused in the present case. He sought for bail on merits. Additionally,...

When Party Violates Status Quo Order, Contempt Proceedings Must Be Initiated Than Merely Vacating Interim Order : Supreme Court

The Supreme Court recently, in a case where the status quo order qua possession of the suit premises was wilfully violated, held that the same amounts to civil contempt. Thus, instead of vacating the stay of execution proceedings, the Court held that contempt proceedings should have been initiated. A Bench of Justices Aniruddha Bose and Sanjay Kumar passed the judgment....

Supreme Court Stays Allahabad HC Order Mandating Court Approval For Setting Up Educational Tribunals in UP

The Supreme Court on Tuesday stayed an Allahabad High Court order stipulating that the Uttar Pradesh Educational Service Tribunals should be established only after the permission of the High Court.“We find that the direction issued by the High Court, in effect requiring the State to establish Tribunal after taking leave of the Court, could not have been passed. In our view, the High Court...

Medical Negligence | Supreme Court Directs Doctor To Pay Rs 2.5 Lakh To Patient Who Lost Vision Of One Eye

The Supreme Court on Monday (January 29) granted relief to the 84-year-old man by directing the Doctor to award him compensation amounting to Rs. 2 Lacs in a medical negligence case. The complainant patient has lodged a consumer complaint against the Doctor after he lost vision in his left eye due to the medical negligence committed by the Doctor in a surgical procedure. The patient has...