State Can Impose Stamp Duty On Insurance Policies Executed Within State, But Only Parliament Can Fix The Rate :Supreme Court

The Supreme Court on April 30 dismissed the appeals filed by the Life Insurance Corporation (LIC) against the demand of stamp duty of approximately Rs 1.19 crores raised by the State of Rajasthan. The Court upheld the legislative competence of the State to levy stamp duty on insurance policies executed within the State subject to the rates determined by the Central legislation.The Bench comprising Justices PS Narasimha and Aravind Kumar observed that the power and jurisdiction of the State to levy and collect duty on policies would be determined by taking into account the factum of where the insurance policies had been issued. Reversing the High Court's findings, the court observed that since the policies of insurance were issued in the State of Rajasthan, the State of Rajasthan would have the power and jurisdiction to levy and collect stamps.The Judgment authored by Justice PS Narasimha clarified that although the power to prescribe the rate of the stamp duty exclusively vests with the Parliament as per Entry 91 of List I, the state government is not deprived of levying and collecting the stamp duty under Entry 44 of List III.“We have undertaken a detailed analysis of the provisions of the Rajasthan Stamp Law (Adaptation) Act, 1952 and the Rajasthan Stamp Rules, 1955 that impose stamp duty on insurance policies issued by the appellant within the state. Section 3 of Indian Stamp Act, 1899 as adapted to the state of Rajasthan is the charging provision as per which the appellant must pay stamp duty to the state government on insurance policies executed within the state. The rate at which stamp duty is payable on policies of insurance under the 1952 Act has been adopted from Schedule I of the central Act, in accordance with Entry 91 of List I. The charging provision has thus been validly enacted by the state government under Entry 44 of List III. Therefore, the state government in the present case can impose stamp duty on the issuance of insurance policies within its territory and require the payment of such stamp duty by the appellant.”, the court said. The stamp duty amounting to Rs. 1.19 crores was demanded by the Rajasthan Government against the execution and issuance of the insurance policies by the Life Insurance Corporation (LIC) in the Rajasthan State under the Rajasthan Stamp Law (Adaptation) Act, 1952 (“Old Stamp Law”). The demand was made by Rajasthan in light of the legislative competence to impose and collect stamp duty on policies of insurance under Entry 44 of List III, as per the rate prescribed by the Parliament under Entry 91 of List I of the constitution. Protesting the demand for the stamp duty, the LIC contended that the State of Rajasthan has no legislative competence to levy and demand stamp duty on the execution and issuance of the insurance policies within the State because as per Entry 91 of List I only the Union Government has the power to levy and collect the stamp duty on the execution and issuance of the insurance policy.State Government Has Legislative Competence To Charge Stamp Duty Under Entry 44 of List III Subject To Rate Prescribed Under Entry 91 of List I The question that appeared before the court was whether the state government has the legislative competence to impose and collect stamp duty on policies of insurance as per Entry 91 of List I read with Entry 44 of List III(Concurrent List). Answering in affirmative, the court observed that the state government has the legislative competence to impose and collect stamp duty on policies of insurance as per Entry 91 of List I read with Entry 44 of List III. The court observed that Entry 91 of List I is not a charging provision but only authorizes the Parliament to prescribe the rate of the stamp duty to be levied by the State Government for the insurance policies issued within the state jurisdiction. “only the Parliament holds the exclusive power and the legislative competence under the Constitution (Entry 91 List I) to prescribe the rate of stamp duty on insurance policies.”, the court said. The court held that the State government can enact a law that imposes stamp duty on insurance policies by using the rate prescribed by the Parliament by sourcing legislative competence through Entry 44 of List III. Upon placing reliance on the Judgment of VVS Rama Sharma v. State of Uttar Pradesh, the court stated that the power to levy stamp duty under Entry 44 of List III is divided between the Union and State, therefore, the state can levy stamp duty on the insurance policies issued within its jurisdiction subject to the rate of stamp duty prescribed by the Union under Entry 91 of List I. “From the above precedents, it is clear that the state of Rajasthan has the power to impose and collect stamp duty on insurance policies under Entry 44 of List III, albeit such duty must be imposed as per the rate prescribed by a Parliamentary legislation under Entry 91 of List I.”, the court said. By Virtue Of Article 254 (2) of the...

State Can Impose Stamp Duty On Insurance Policies Executed Within State, But Only Parliament Can Fix The Rate :Supreme Court

Yash Mittal

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

State Can Impose Stamp Duty On Insurance Policies Executed Within State, But Only Parliament Can Fix The Rate :Supreme Court

Yash Mittal

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers