Supreme Court Issues Directions To Trial Courts On Cataloguing Witnesses & Evidence In Criminal Case Judgments

The Supreme Court on Monday (December 15) issued directions to all the trial courts aiming to institutionalize a standardized format for cataloguing witnesses, documentary evidence, and material objects. “we are of the considered view that a more structured and uniform practice must be adopted to enhance the legibility of criminal judgments. Accordingly, to ensure a systematic presentation of evidence that enables efficient appreciation of the record, we issue the following directions to all trial Courts across the country. These directions aim to institutionalize a standardized format for cataloguing witnesses, documentary evidence, and material objects. This will serve to facilitate better comprehension and immediate reference for all stakeholders, including the Appellate Courts. Hence, we are passing the following directions, which shall be adhered to by all trial Courts across the country.”, the bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta, said while acquitting a man accused for sexually assaulting a 4 year old girl under the POCSO Act, holding that the prosecution failed to establish a credible case due to serious lapses in the cataloguing, custody, and handling of evidence.The following directions were issued:Preparation of Tabulated Charts in all the judgments: All trial Courts dealing with criminal matters shall, at the conclusion of the judgment, incorporate tabulated charts summarizing: - a. Witnesses examined, b. Documents exhibited, and c. Material objects (muddamal) produced and exhibited. These charts shall form an appendix or concluding segment of the judgment and shall be prepared in a clear, structured and easily comprehensible format. Standardized Chart of Witnesses Each criminal judgment shall contain a witness chart with at least the following columns: a. Serial Number b. Name of the Witness c. Brief Description/Role of the Witness, such as: Informant, Eye-witness, Medical Jurist/Doctor, Investigating Officer (I.O.), Panch Witness, etc. The description should be succinct but sufficient to indicate the evidentiary character of the witness. This structured presentation will allow quick reference to the nature of testimony, assist in locating the witness in the record, and minimize ambiguity. PW No.Name Of WitnessDescription1Mr.XEye-witness2Mr. YWitness of last seen circumstance 3Ms. ZMedical Jurist 4Mr. AInvestigating Officer5Mr. BComplainant/First InformantStandardized Chart of Exhibited Documents A separate chart shall be prepared for all documents exhibited during trial. This chart shall include: a. Exhibit Number; b. Description of document; c. The Witness who proved or attested the document. Illustratively, the description may include: FIR, complaint, panchnamas, medical certificates, FSL reports, seizure memos, site plans, dying declarations, etc. The requirement of specifying the witness who proved the document ensures traceability of proof and assist the Court in appreciating compliance with the Indian Evidence Act, 1872/Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023.Specimen Chart for Exhibited DocumentsExhibit No.Description of the Exhibit Proved by/Attested by1Inquest Panchnama/MemoPW-12Recovery Panchnama/MemoPW-23Arrest MemoPW-34Post-mortem Report PW-45FSL ReportPW-5Standardized Chart of Material Objects/Muddamals Whenever material objects are produced and marked as exhibits, the trial Court shall prepare a third chart with: a. Material Object (M.O.) Number; b. Description of the Object; c. Witness who proved the Object's Relevance (e.g., weapon, clothing, tool, article seized under panchnama, etc.)Specimen Chart for Material Objects/MuddamalsMaterial Object No.Description of the ExhibitProved by/Attested by1Weapon of OffencePW-12Clothing of accused/victimPW-23Mobile Phone/Electronic Object PW-34VehiclePW-45Purse/earrings/identity cardPW-5Special Provisions for Cases Involving Voluminous Evidence In complex cases, such as conspiracies, economic offences or trials involving voluminous oral or documentary evidence, the list of witnesses and exhibits may be substantially long. Where the number of witnesses or documents is unusually large, the trial Court may prepare charts only for the material, relevant, and relied-upon witnesses and documents, clearly indicating that the chart is confined to such items. This ensures that the charts remain functional reference tools rather than unwieldy compilations. While these directions are primarily intended to streamline criminal trials, we leave it open to the High Courts to consider, wherever appropriate, the adoption of similar tabulated formats in civil matters as well, particularly in cases involving voluminous documentary or oral evidence, so as to promote clarity, uniformity, and ease of reference.Application to Defence Witnesses and Evidence The aforesaid directions shall apply, mutatis mutandis, to all witnesses examined and all evidence adduced by the defence. Adoption of...

Supreme Court Issues Directions To Trial Courts On Cataloguing Witnesses & Evidence In Criminal Case Judgments

Yash Mittal

The Court issued the directions to have a standard and uniform tabular chart in judgments.

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Yash Mittal

Supreme Court Issues Directions To Trial Courts On Cataloguing Witnesses & Evidence In Criminal Case Judgments

Yash Mittal

The Court issued the directions to have a standard and uniform tabular chart in judgments.

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Yash Mittal

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers